this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
27 points (65.2% liked)

News

23361 readers
3606 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The outlet, which describes itself as Pennsylvania’s only African American-owned and operated radio station, also said the White House’s decision to supply questions to Lawful-Sanders prolonged a historical practice of marginalizing and “de-legitimizing Black voices” in US media.

"Lawful-Sanders was one of two battleground state radio hosts who aired an interview with Biden on 4 July and described being given questions by the president’s staff ahead of the conversation."

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 73 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Not passing judgement on anyone's behavior, but isn't it typical to be given a list of approved questions when interviewing someone like the president?

[–] wolf_2202@sh.itjust.works 41 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes. I don’t personally understand what the story is here. I’ve never heard of any high-profile politician going into an scheduled interview without a team providing a list of approved questions.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The story is:

The presidents aides called a radio station before an interview with the president to give them a list of questions.

This is bad journalism.

Imagine if Trump gave CNN a list of questions they could ask him on air. Would you watch that interview? Take it seriously?

[–] wolf_2202@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

No, I wouldn’t watch that interview. I, and I’d wager everyone else using the fediverse, am highly skeptical of large media institutions specifically because they engage in questionable journalistic practices like this.

My point is: there is no scandal here. It seems to me that this story is getting signal boosted specifically to discredit the president. The realities of interviews like this are left out of these headlines and it’s very frustrating.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run -5 points 4 months ago

The story is a cover up

[–] dank 11 points 4 months ago

No. It's fairly common for interviewees to ask for a list of questions beforehand, but according to Boston University journalism professor Christopher Daly "it is not good professional practice to give questions in advance to sources such as public officials." And to let the interviewee actually write the questions for you is egregious journalism malpractice, thus the resignation.

[–] rigatti@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Not sure but that wouldn't surprise me.

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Regardless, the optics at the moment are harmful. I mostly appreciate the job Joe has done, but I'm starting to come around on a Kamala candidacy.

If he resigned from the Presidency now, for personal reasons, that would be nothing but respected by almost all Americans. Kamala would become President, and be running as the incumbent trying to continue his policies and direction into the next term.

She may not poll well at the moment, but that could be worked on.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

She may not poll well at the moment, but that could be worked on.

The election is in ~3 months (doesn't seem like it given our 3 year election cycles, but it is). I'm hesitant to add any more chaos to this already chaotic election.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

Better to add more "chaos" than to bet the future of the world on an already losing candidate who's only digging the hole deeper every time he reaffirms his commitment to not listen to the people he's supposed to represent.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah this doesn't add up. She's being forced out over something else. This is a cover.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Or she was offered something lucrative in return. Usually a cushy job making lots more money than before.

This is the method used on many senators in us Congress, its a form of legalized bribery.

Time will tell what really happened, because this is a non story for any other president.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 4 months ago

Other presidents haven’t performed as poorly as he did during a debate. While concerns over their age and mental acuity were already at play.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's not just radio interviews like this, it's late night talk shows too. Everyone knows the questions and answers before they go live.

This journalists problem is that she didn't have to actually USE the questions, she could have gone her own direction. It's also likely they're forcing her out for admitting they fed her the questions, making the Biden team look bad.

[–] dank 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it standard operating procedure or not? If it is, then why would it make the Biden team look bad for revealing that they followed the norms.

It's not unheard of for a politician to ask what will be covered in an interview. It's not good practice to provide questions ahead of time, and it's unheard of to let the interviewee script the questions themselves.

Most damning is the lack of confidence Biden's own staffers have in him to rig the interviews in which he is supposed to be demonstrating his mental agility and acuity.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Because the media is complicit and anything and everything the Biden administration does, whether good or bad, is still portrayed as bad. You just fell for their bullshit.