this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
301 points (98.7% liked)

News

22890 readers
3745 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 105 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No booze or cigarettes, but guns are totally cool.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Tobacco use isn't in the Constitution. Any state can have a drinking age of 18, perfectly legal. They just get their federal highway funds yanked.

So it's tough to tell someone, "Yeah, it's a right for other adults, just not you."

If I had my druthers, I'd raise the national age to 21 when brains are a good bit more developed.

[–] cybervseas@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago (74 children)

2A even has the term "well regulated" in it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They only care about the second half.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

unless black people are owning guns then they'll be all for gun control.. like when the black panthers armed themselves.

[–] BombOmOm@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

unless black people are owning guns then they’ll be all for gun control

Red states tend to have some of the most free firearms laws in the country. And many of those states, particularly in the south, have large black populations. In fact, many of them have explicitly killed policies that were used to discriminate based on race, namely may-issue permitting laws.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

SCOTUS pretty much shit canned the first half on the 2A a long time ago. Can’t remember the case, but they basically said a “well regulated militia” could be anyone.

ETA: as someone else pointed out, the case was DC v Heller.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Heller, 2008.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (72 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 44 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think sometimes about if cars were a thing when the bill of rights was written, they might've had an amendment like "travel, being important to a free state, the right to drive an automobile shall not be infringed "

And then we'd have all sorts of problems where like six year olds would be driving , blind people would be driving, you wouldn't have any safety standards or environmental standards, etc etc etc. And people would be jerking themselves raw about how it's great , that freedom is great, they love when their car explodes.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

And then we'd have all sorts of problems where like six year olds would be driving , blind people would be driving, you wouldn't have any safety standards or environmental standards, etc etc etc. And people would be jerking themselves raw about how it's great , that freedom is great, they love when their car explodes.

I have no agenda here. I just thought your comment was comical and then I saw all of these:

6 year olds… 😬

Blind… 😬

Safety standards… 😬

Car explodes… 😬

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemm.ee 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

18 for everything. "various levels of adulthood" need to go away. Either you're an adult or not.

Don't like it? Prove you actually believe what you say you do and work to raise the draft age to 21.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

18 is to young to be considered an adult. I think 21 is more fitting but we don't mentally mature until late 20s.

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/publications/the-teen-brain-7-things-to-know

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

At the same time we're capable of adult level actions earlier than 18. We regularly have children, kill people, drive, have jobs, have bank accounts, make life altering decisions about sports and school credits... etc.

The argument for lowering the age of majority is far stronger than the argument for raising it.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It is a complicated subject. Medical decisions and voting is something that should be a lower age. However, there is a massive list that should not be pushed on younger people.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

My point is adulthood comes for us whether the government wants it to or not. The list of things we do as teenagers that are adulting is far larger than the list of things we are mandated to wait for.

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 months ago

I understand that my point is the government should protect that class of people instead of exploiting. I think we both agree it is not good either way. It's just another way we are failing younger people.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 24 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Well tbh if we send them to war to die why are we limiting their constitutional rights?

If 21 is the new age of adulthood, then society should start acting like it instead of doing this selective circle jerk. Otherwise, such regulations have no legal leg to stand on.

[–] SirDerpy@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree with you. But, that's not how things work.

We've neglected public education and mental health for roughly forty years. The establishment wants a complete monopoly on violence. And, laws are only enforced when convenient for the ruling class. The state has caused an issue - stupid unstable people with guns - and will now use it as an excuse to further monopolize use of violence as a means.

[–] sunzu@kbin.run 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

that's not how things work.

I am not following this tbh

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

This is good. Now do the same with alcohol. You can be forced to die in a war at 18 but can't drink and enjoy the full rights of an adult citizen.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, pretty sure we've got an amendment for that so that'll take a bit more effort.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I immediately thought the same thing, but unfortunately there’s no constitutionally guaranteed right to alcohol.

Yet.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AncientFutureNow@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

But what about StATeS RiGhTs???!!

[–] gascown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Only Americans can be so retarded to find something like unconstitutional. What a dumb country.

[–] 5redie8@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, guess I should've chosen to be born somewhere else. Rookie mistake

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Meanwhile, the gun rights group Minnesota Gun Owners Caucus, which was among the organizations that challenged the law, cheered the decision.

“This is a resounding victory for 18-20-year-old adults who wish to exercise their constitutional right to bear arms,” Bryan Strawser, the group’s chairman, said in a statement.


Second Amendment

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›