this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024
939 points (92.4% liked)

Progressive Politics

1107 readers
1367 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 59 points 4 months ago (4 children)

But a Republican tried to kill another Republican! And an old guy had a cold!

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 22 points 4 months ago

Yes it’s quite the collection of ultra-complex confusing and incomprehensible mysteries

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

It's more like a school shooter whom Republicans refuse to do anything about in regards to restricting access to arms nearly killed their presidential candidate.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkNightoftheSoul@mander.xyz 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

a bit on the nose isn't it?

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 88 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty much how easy and obvious the choice is

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What's it say about our country that we have so many that want to vote republican?

[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

That media has gone unchecked for many decades. They shouldn't be able to spew lies and ignore key facts to create a false narrative like republicans have been doing for 50+ years.

Shit should've been regulated long ago so as to not have the current situation we're in where a portion of the population has become brainwashed.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Also that public education is in the toilet. And has been for decades.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 14 points 4 months ago

nothing that isn't already well known

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (9 children)

Whats it say about our country that so-called-progressives won’t vote Democratic.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

Some people need help getting it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

boTh paRtIeS arE thE same!

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Hmmm, the nice old guy or the nasty old guy, so hard to choose! If only there were some difference between them to help me decide.

[–] InternetUser2012 9 points 4 months ago (5 children)

The orange one that's a racist rapist with 34 felonies states he's going to be a dictator

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aLiteral_potato@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

What if the yanks had more than 2 parties, maybe it would be great. Before anyone says anything, yes i know that other parties can exist but they dont do really anything.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago

What if the yanks had more than 2 parties

We're often lucky to have more than one party. States like Texas and Florida are so heavily gerrymandered that supermajorities for the prevailing party are practically assured. The Dems form a rump of opposition in these states, while Greens and Libertarians are barely an afterthought.

i know that other parties can exist but they dont do really anything.

Constituencies in Europe are significantly smaller and more regionally distinct. Hard to have a Scottish New Labor Party or a French Polynesia Party when our states are dominated by constituencies that moved in barely a generation ago. By all rights we should have a "Texas Party" and a "California Party". But its worth noting that the modern Texas GOP was built up practically brick-by-brick through George HW Bush and the Standard Oil company, originally based out in NY/NJ/CT. Dallas, Houston, and Austin are dominated by families of east coast Republicans who came spilling in during the 80s/90.

We should probably have a "Christian Democrats" party or a "Tea Party" properly, but the major religious and ideological leaders of the past were fully wedded to the existing post-WW2 partisan establishment. The closest we ever really had to a break-away party in the last half-century was the Jim Crow Segregationists under George Wallace. And that fell apart in the face of Nixon's Southern Strategy simply gobbling up all the Dixiecrats and turning them into modern day Republicans.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

What if the yanks had more than 2 parties, maybe it would be great. Before anyone says anything, yes i know that other parties can exist but they dont do really anything.

That's because the Electoral College says other parties, who will necessarily not get as many votes as the other two, will not get any electoral votes. Most states are winner-take-all. As far as Presidential elections go, that's why there's never a third party winner.

Locally, you're likely to find "Independent" candidates who run without financial support from one of the two flavors of political soda, and occasionally other political organizations as well. Locally (city government, school board, etc.) it's possible. But nationally no party has had the reach or interest from voters to overcome the hurdles to federal election. Many have tried.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Technically we do, but only the Republicans and Democrats are ever given attention in the media so they're the only two parties most people know about before seeing the other options on the ballot. Add to that you get guys like Vermin Supreme as alternative choices, which if you don't know anything about them makes them look even crazier than the two big douchebags you do know about.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Not to mention that third parties CAN’T win with our current system except in extremely unusual circumstances. In order for viable third parties here we have to implement a different voting system like ranked-choice voting. A couple states have done this along with non-partisan redistricting but it’s not enough.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EnderWiggin@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Kamala Harris is also now the only candidate who won't be fucking 80 while in office.

load more comments
view more: next ›