this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
464 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3242 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw a picture of a canceled check online. Was wondering if it was real.

Yup. From the California Secretary of State site.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 81 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is embarrassing. He should probably drop out of the race to get out of the spotlight.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He should probably choke on a hamberder.

[–] InternetUser2012 1 points 3 months ago

To be fair, I'm a little shocked he hasn't choked on Putins cock. That guy must be hung like a gerbil.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Don't give them ideas. The only silver lining to a possible second Trump term is his staggering incompetence. He drops out and they replace him with someone just as evil, but more capable.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

But would they find anyone else with such a cult following?

And how long would the chaos last as people tried to take Donald’s spot?

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 73 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Donald J Trump donating THOUSANDS to Democrats proves NOTHING! But Thomas Crooks giving $15 to Democrats PROVES he was ACTUALLY a Democrat!

[–] baru@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Wasn't that 15 dollar donation done by someone from a different state and the same name?

[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Nope, they confirmed it was him.

My take though is that it was ~4 years ago- he was 17. My politics between 17 and 20 did a 180 so I don't see it as any damning evidence of his political affiliation.

They looked at his search history and he also was looking up Biden and other politicians of different political affiliation- this is just conjecture but he may have chosen Trump merely because he was the easiest to get to. The kid was angry at the world and wanted to kill someone in power.

The only thing we know for sure, is that we don't know and can't know the whole truth. It died with him. That take generally too scary for most people to accept, so any explanation gives us comfort.

[–] Freefall@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Same name, same zip code, allegedly different person. I haven't seen any updates on the allegedly bit, but all signs point to that kid being anti-dem his whole life. (My assumption is a joke/insult donation in his name...source: I have done this to people and sent them the receipt.)

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 3 months ago

(My assumption is a joke/insult donation in his name…source: I have done this to people and sent them the receipt.)

My wife's pet theory is he lost a bet

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Same name, same street address, but the city listed on the donation was wrong. It was listed as Pittsburgh instead of New Bethel, PA. But the street address does not exist in Pittsburgh.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 51 points 3 months ago

It was just reported by Act Blue that they received 27 million dollars in the first 5 hours after the announcement.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 18 points 3 months ago (5 children)

That doesn’t say much. He was probably invited to a political fundraiser and he likes to flash his cash. I’ll bet he donated to plenty of republicans before 2016

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 49 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's sad though. He doesn't remember it because his mind is so far gone. I think the media needs to call for a few press conferences where they ask him pointed questions about it until he flubs a few words. Then they should ask him more questions about what he just said.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think he also has selective memory when it comes to whatever works in his favor at the moment.

[–] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Whatever cognitive impairment he has, his brain is not good. It'll be a miracle if he can form a sentence by the time of the debate with Kamala Harris. I expect the news media to scrutinize his every sentence, as we know they always do with older presidential candidates.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 9 points 3 months ago

I don’t really see the media going line by line pointing out how he’s lying 99% of the time. Or preventing those obvious lies from reaching the ears of the people.

If they did, his speeches would be as redacted as an Epstein document.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It’s not supposed to say much. It’s a jab at the asshole.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 10 points 3 months ago

Some people might consider a jab at the asshole a good time.

[–] kbin_space_program@kbin.run 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Recall that his family and the Clintons, before the 2016 run, used to be very close friends.

To the point that Bill Clinton and him have both admitted to having a several hours long phone call shortly prior to him running for the GOP primary, but they both "swear politics never came up".

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

He did it because he was being prosecuted and was hoping for political favors again.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What was he being prosecuted for?

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure I read Trump University. Can't remember where I read it. Or I would provide a link.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

That’s probably right. I recall it being around that period.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It can be used to influence dumbfuck undecideds.

[–] radivojevic@discuss.online 2 points 3 months ago

I’m not sure they would understand.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)

She should donate money in that amount to a woman's shelter and say she doesn't want it, and "this is now the only beneficial thing Trump has ever done for women."

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 43 points 3 months ago (2 children)

https://www.npr.org/2024/07/22/g-s1-12696/kamala-harris-donation-trump-election

But Harris did not keep the $6,000 from Trump. A spokesperson told the Sacramento Bee in 2020 that she donated the money to a "nonprofit that advocates for civil and human rights for Central Americans" in 2015, by which point she had been reelected and was launching her bid for the Senate.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Dang, she beat me to it

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Omg that’s why he hates her

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

It will be hilarious when Pedo Donnie loses to Kamala.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 3 months ago

Maybe this is an unpopular opinion, but while funny I don't think this is the smoking gun that some people seem to believe it is

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Little did he know she was coming to bite him. Now is she gonna beat him, we don't know yet.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Are all political contributions publicly searchable?

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, legally.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

For U.S. Federal campaigns, you can search the FEC database for individual contributions: https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/how-to-research-public-records/individual-contributions/

When searching, if you don't get any results, be mindful of time filters and also spellings.

For other types of contributions (PACs, etc): https://www.fec.gov/introduction-campaign-finance/how-to-research-public-records/

For State races, each state maintains their own. The one above was for California where Harris was running for state office.

Another good resource is https://www.opensecrets.org

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

"Even trump supported me back when he was sane." 😉