this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2024
118 points (90.4% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3978 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 65 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Man born owning an emerald mine claims he supports meritocracy, will donate money to man born owning thousands of homes.

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 25 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Don't forget he lost money in a casino as the owner.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure he was cleaning money...

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

It's still nearly impossible to bankrupt a casino, even while laundering money. That's part of why it's such a great business for money laundering. It practically runs itself and will be reliable long-term.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 36 points 3 months ago

Did he back down from $45m/no? Sounded like be was still giving it yo a PAC to elect Trump. He was just complaining about "inaccurate" reporting of "donating to Trump" directly, because it gave him an excuse to shit on people.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 21 points 3 months ago

He can't possibly, but I like the energy.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like Elon is becoming the Kanye of tech. It’s a weirdly similar progression, in terms of the public face he presents.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

Nah. He's just bad at keeping his word.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 10 points 3 months ago

People like Trump are surprised that people like Trump don't have genuine loyalty to people like Trump...

[–] blahsay@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotta say I read the article and Musk never says anything like knowing Trump will lose to Harris.

Is this cause he wouldn't confirm the amount he's donating?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

No, because he's an idiot and says stuff before he realizes what he's doing, then tries to back out. Just like trying to buy Twitter and a dozen other stupid things, like challenging Zuckerberg to an MMA fight or whatever.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He didn't back out. He's just clarifying that he's donating to a PAC instead of to Trump himself which is illegal.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Throw a few "OP will surely deliver" memes in between the initial promise and this retraction and you'd have a /b/ thread.

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Srh@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago