this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2024
1 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13964 readers
713 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's the NYT - https://archive.ph/48YXJ

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sappho@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ugh, this gets right to a massive pet peeve of mine regarding mainstream climate change coverage. This relentless fucking fixation on having hope, the absolute strident necessity that we all feel the "correct way" about what approaches us. It's toxic positivity. It's emotional policing.

All of these people are terrified of death and they have no idea what hope even is! Yelling at some teenager grieving the destruction of the biosphere, "Be more optimistic! Look at the cool tech!" - it's not just ineffective, it's the literal opposite of helpful.

Hope isn't optimism! Hope isn't believing that we will win. Hope is when you've gone fully into despair and then find yourself, somehow, still alive there. This facade of positivity they call hope will break at the first sign of stress; that's why they push it so hard, insisting we all perform optimism as well, propping up their fragile feelings for them. I just want to shout it in their faces: You can't have hope without death! You can't have peace without grieving! Fuck you, start weeping!

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks, Obama!

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

Focusing on disaster hasn't changed the planet's trajectory. Will a more upbeat approach show the way forward?

this is the most idealist baby-brained shit ever written. change the mode of production? no, you just didn't center your chakras while creating your vision board