this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
51 points (98.1% liked)

Data is Beautiful

2366 readers
1 users here now

Be respectful

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The values would be more relevant with the percentage of total medals won over the total metals available as the number of disciplines and medals changes with the Olympic Games considered.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hm, that's a good point, but has it changed that much since then? I have the impression that, apart from the host country's choice event, it's been fairly stable for 4-5 editions at least.

[–] leftascenter@jlai.lu 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Stats cover since 1895. So yes, it changed from 43 to 300+.

See bottom table here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olympic_sports?wprov=sfla1

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago
[–] morphballganon@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Did East Germany ever host?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

I think it was on NBC just yesterday that they had a graphic addressing the same phenomenon but just tracking more recent games and the hosts’ performance in the preceding games, I think the previous 4 Olympic Games for each host.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh Canada. You're too good to the rest of the world, and we should all be better towards you.

[–] blargerer@kbin.melroy.org 7 points 11 months ago

Look at the winter games and the home advantage in Vancouver might be the highest on the whole thing.