this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
202 points (100.0% liked)

News

22838 readers
3782 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A US Army analyst has pleaded guilty to charges of conspiring to sell military secrets to China, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has said.

Sgt Korbein Schultz was arrested in March after an investigation by the FBI and US Army counterintelligence alleged that he was paid $42,000 (£33,000) in exchange for dozens of sensitive security records.

The criminal conspiracy began in June 2022 and continued up until his arrest, officials said.

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 73 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

$42,000.

I hope the secrets were like "how to properly clean the latrine" for that cheap of a price.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 36 points 4 weeks ago

“Oh, it’s gonna be clean when I’m done with it”

The purported Hong Kong resident asked Sgt Schultz to collect sensitive data related to missile defence and mobile artillery systems, according to court records.

Sgt Schultz also collected data on US fighter aircraft, military tactics, and the US military's defence strategy for Taiwan, based on what it learned from Russia's war in Ukraine.

Jesus 😳

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

I don't know if this is the situation, but I'm guessing it's something related- If you owe $42,000 to your bookies, that might be worth selling a few secrets.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 73 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Sgt Schultz also collected data on US fighter aircraft, military tactics, and the US military's defence strategy for Taiwan, based on what it learned from Russia's war in Ukraine.

42 grand to sell out your country and fellow soldiers like that?!?! Fuck. Me. I am utterly shocked at how cheap that is.

[–] KingGordon@lemmy.world 25 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

42 to give up your life, universe, and everything.

So long, and thanks for nothing!

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 weeks ago

Hey, Americans would do it for less. The smug feeling of proving themselves right on a War Thunder forum is compensation enough for some.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 30 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Whenever I read something like this, I think about that and wonder why there is still no meaningful prosecution whatsoever.

[–] breakingcups@lemmy.world 22 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

When you're the president, they let you do it. Grab em right by the intel.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yes, that is apparently pretty much what the supreme court says. But unfortunately at least Thomas and Alito are obviously corrupt as well.

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 12 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

What the hell are these pieces of shit thinking?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They're thinking "My employer doesn't pay me enough for me to live comfortably, gotta do something about it..."

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

~~If they were struggling financially they wouldn’t have been granted a clearance in the first place.~~

After being promised more money from his handler, he said in another message: "I hope so! I need to get my other BMW back!".

…maybe they skimped on the background check?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You can get your background check and get in financial trouble after the fact and you can also get the job and realize that you're underpaid for your level of responsibility... But it might have been greed plain and simple.

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Definitely - especially since they’re given clearances while they’re still practically kids and have no substantial financial history.

Basically, if you can get approved for a credit card with a $100 limit, you can get approved for a security clearance.

[–] Warl0k3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

In theory sure. In practice, damn near anyone can get a clearance if their CO leans on the evaluating body a little. It's ridiculous some of people we happily hand serious, hardcore state secrets to

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember people on Reddit talking about how these young enlisted guys would see their military paychecks and just buy shit right and left not realizing that they can't actually afford it. So all these sergeants would have brand new expensive cars parked at their barracks (or however that works).

[–] ccunning@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Hopefully by the time they reach Sergeant they have more sense than that.

There definitely is truth to stereotype of privates buying Hellcats at the low low rate of 24.99% APY though…

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I was going to make a joke about a relatively young, new member of the military blowing their signing bonus as a downpayment on a car they can't really afford, but uh... ate the onion.

There's a reason many military bases have a ton of car dealerships in close proximity.

[–] yeather@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 weeks ago

They’re thinking it’s an easy payday for information that is probably going to be declassified anyways

[–] Trigger2_2000@sh.itjust.works 8 points 4 weeks ago

A real American hero - just like Trump. /s