this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2024
80 points (92.6% liked)

movies

1777 readers
393 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 53 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I wish they would say why they're "not thrilled". Barbie, as a franchise, has a history of animated movies long before the live-action was a thing. I'm more surprised its taken this long, and hasn't been a flood of "We're redoing Barbie and the Three Musketeers with slightly better animation!" while the iron was hot.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There has been, Netflix have done a handful of different Barbie series with multiple seasons over the last decade. Doesn't seem like the next one is substantially changing direction resultant from the film. Feels like the premise for this article was to just reaction-bait its stars.

[–] NakariLexfortaine@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

Ah, so that's where they went. Makes sense. Probably a better market than the old "Direct-to-Video" releases they did.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

They should just get with Larian and do a Barbie RPG instead

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 26 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Haven't there been like 200 Barbie movies already? What's the big deal?

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Yeah gosh I remember these movies being on all the time as a child because my sister loved them. I still find myself quoting "lefting, leftaroo" on a pretty regular basis.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it's like Avatar the Last Airbender, they don't want the movie being made without the original creators. The live action on Netflix did a great job with the mood of the locations and hiring the actors, everything else is pretty bad. They don't want to see all their work bastardized. I get it.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

they don't want the movie being made without the original creators.

So... Mattel?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Did you see the movie? It wasn't really showing Mattel in the best light. I was surprised they let it go through.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Regardless, it's their IP, they can do what they want with it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Avatar the Last Airbender was owned by Nickelodeon at the time of the movie, what's your point? The creators of the movie Barbie rebranded it to what made tons of money.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 5 points 3 months ago

What's your point? Mattel owns Barbie, they get to decide what to do with it or not. Greta Gerwig and Margo Robbie do not own Barbie, they have no say in what happens with it.

[–] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 months ago

@MargotRobbie@lemmy.world thoughts?

[–] korthrun@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Well of course not, they want as many of the sequel dollars as they can possibly get. What, they're to share the hype with filthy animators?!