this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
546 points (98.1% liked)

Work Reform

9801 readers
942 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Paywall removed: https://archive.is/dHH7a

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 171 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I keep banging on about how hiring practices need to be reformed, and stopping this shit should be the first thing on the agenda

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 57 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is no agenda for the benefit of working people.

Corpos do this on purpose to tired out the wage slaves with bull shit.

Best we can do is to educate ourselves and avoid these idiotic games.

Middle levels and senior people can start doing this today.

Entry level, well young people act like this is the first time this has happened in history but I can tell you that entry level has been bloodbath since early 1990s.

But once you get some grip, start acting like you respect yourself

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If we elect the right people we can make it the agenda. That's a big ask yes, but it's also why they don't want us to vote.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If people keep voting two party regime or don't vote, the owners don't care.

Voting third party as protest vote is where it is at IMHO so maybe in 20 years there is a third option

Ain't American democracy grand?

[–] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (9 children)

2 party sucks. But they are not the same. One offers some hope of change. Look at the recents changes to air travels the FTC did. https://www.transportation.gov/briefing-room/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-rules-deliver-automatic-refunds-and

They are consumer protections.

Now imagine if we organized and voted in ppl like Bernie or AOC. We can achieve real change.

I'm sorry but voting 3rd party without the math making sense or ranked choice voting, is largely a waste of a vote

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 55 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Start by paying interviewees the wage of the job posted for their time interviewing and doing "tests"

These fuckers spend bajillions on HR software and HR execs, surely they can figure out how to hire quality candidates at a more efficient clip?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

HR is the reverse union... Yet NPCs will accept the parasite but screach at an idea of bargaining power 🤡

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 116 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

It may seem counterproductive for recruiters to advertise ghost jobs, theoretically wasting their own time as well as that of applicants—but there are incentives for doing so. About 38% say they post fake positions to maintain a presence on job boards when they aren’t hiring, 36% do so to assess the effectiveness of their job descriptions, 26% want to build a talent pool for the future, 26% hope gain insight into the job market and competitors, and 25% want to assess how difficult it would be to replace certain employees, according to the report. Escalera points out that a big reason for posting these jobs is recruiters wanting to improve their business’ image—nearly a quarter also say that fake jobs help their companies look as if they aren’t experiencing a hiring freeze, and one fifth say they post ghost jobs to improve the reputation of their company.

Way to validate our feelings about you, recruiters.

Edit: I'd like to see legislation that goes after "truth in advertising" in this area. This should be illegal. It wastes peoples' time.

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Thanks for excerpting the main points, appreciated.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Recruiters are the equivalent of used car salesperson.

[–] Heartwotalk@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 3 weeks ago

At least used car salespeople will actually sell you the car. Apparently recruiters will just lie about ever even having one.

[–] MonkeMischief 1 points 3 weeks ago

Lol when a used car salesman is fired for being too dishonest, he becomes a recruiter as a fallback.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Madrigal@lemmy.world 64 points 3 weeks ago

The HR profession’s reputation as pond scum remains intact.

[–] CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world 49 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Legal vs illegal when it comes to business is a forgone conclusion. Enforceable vs unenforceable should be the main focus. If you pass 100 laws and none of them are enforced on the entities that caused the legislation, you are only punching down.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Then the enforcement squad should be vigilantism towards the recruiters, no ?

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

The way we are going, that's how it will have to handled.

Bad faith actors will be punished by the mob because the state refuses to do its job.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

I have job hopped 3 times in the last 2 years, increasing my salary by over 25% each time. My secret? Recruiters. I don't know if I'm just in a high demand field, but I just keep my LinkedIn profile set to "looking for work" and every couple of weeks I'll get a new recruiter reaching out. I always respond and see what they're offering. Sure, 9/10 times it's not better, but at least I can use them to sharpen my resume/interviews skills. But then there's always that 1/10 where it's like "wait, you're offering HOW much?!"

I never plan on leaving, but damn, am I just supposed to ignore an offer with a huge pay increase?

The best time to look for a new job is when you already have one. If you have a job, set your profile to open and keep an ear to the ground. Let the recruiters work for you. You'll never know what will come your way.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 8 points 3 weeks ago

Similar for me, but just 2 times in 8 years. Including internal promotions at those jobs, I increased my salary by more than 3x.

It costs literally nothing to just be open for incoming contact requests.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 8 points 3 weeks ago

Linkedin is the only worthwhile social media. Just ignore the feed and just use it to connect with recruiters.

[–] NewWorldOverHere@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

At what point do they tell you what salary they’re offering?

Does your field require extensive tests/interview process prior to being hired?

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yea salary is usually discussed after the tests/interview. I do them anyways to keep my skills sharp.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago

that sounds soul crushing

[–] danielquinn@lemmy.ca 35 points 3 weeks ago

Fucking parasites.

[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 23 points 3 weeks ago

No wonder I've only had 4 interviews in 9 months. The job application process is fucking ridiculous right now.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

The one and only time I managed to get scheduled for an interview from an online job application, GMail filed the fucking email as spam! So of course I missed the interview... ☹️

Fuck online job applications!

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

There’s 2 companies that still have the same job posting I applied to 6 months ago up and none of my other ex coworkers heard anything from them either. I won’t apply to those companies again. Bu bye

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

When I was starting out I would copy job postings for the position I wanted and then post a fake version so I could see what sort of resumes I'd be competing against.

The take away from doing that: put effort into the design of your resume - make it a pdf and never send a word doc.

Oh, also applying for jobs is a pure numbers game. You should be applying to as many as you can and not spend too much time on any one application.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

People send fucking Word docs‽

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Some HR clowns specifically ask for them

[–] MonkeMischief 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Wait til you see "Copy paste your entire resume into this tiny plaintext input box." Lmao

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

and then upload it as a document separately anyways because fuck you, also write a cover letter because ditto

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Is this a joke? You say you were doing the same thing as the HR people, i.e. posting fake applications so why is this getting voted up?

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm just sharing relevant information. It's not just HR people posting fake jobs, it's also other job hunters checking out the competition.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good to know I can expect maybe 1/3 of applications to be legit

[–] kandoh@reddthat.com 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You should expect 95% of your applications to never even be looked at. It's a total numbers game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 12 points 3 weeks ago

This, this right here is Exhibits E through H as to why Labor Reform in America is overdue

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

That would explain my poor luck with getting interviews. So I choose to believe this.

"Am I unemployable for reasons I am incapable of comprehending?" "No. No, it's the recruiters who are wrong."

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So there’s employment in the afterlife?

[–] Nommer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago

Don't give them ideas. Death is the only escape from work we'll likely have.

[–] littlewonder@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yeah, the retirement age has been raised to dead + 25 years.

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 weeks ago

Only in hell.

load more comments
view more: next ›