this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
264 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54500 readers
695 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 89 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This ‘secrecy’ is not an oversight but a feature that’s codified in the agreement between rightsholders and Internet providers.

Well this setup seems perfectly secure and not at all susceptible to malicious actors.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 22 points 2 months ago

Secrecy and bypassing court orders? It seems like illegal censorship to me.

[–] kbal@fedia.io 63 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Disappointing, Germany. How can we trust you to find the best pirate sites when not even thepiratebay.org is on the list?

[–] suzune@ani.social 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They don't block torrents because they like to watch people connect to the nodes and then sue them.

It's always better to use onion routing.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 113 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Nah, stick to VPNs. Don't overload Tor with pirate media. Tor network isn't meant for large data transfers like that.

[–] Staubsaugernasenmann@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I2P could be a suitable alternative for this. Although it is rather slow it still works and you dont have to worry about beeing exposed

[–] endofline@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Pretty much like the original reason why napster has been created. It could resume downloads which in the times of early internet explorer wasn't that guaranteed

[–] wintermute@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The ones that monitor torrent to sue people are lawyer firms, not the government.

[–] Txmyx@feddit.org 2 points 2 months ago

The government is also not blocking any sites. Only like 5 ISPs are in the CUII. Many people are not even affected

[–] SoGrumpy@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 months ago

After a quick butchers at the list, I think they are going after streaming sites rather than torrent sites per se.

[–] average_joe@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 2 months ago

I think the list mostly contains german piracy websites like kino is german for cinema

[–] EddyBot@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 months ago

usage of public torrent tracker in germany is almost non-existent
the fear of getting sued by copyright laywers is pretty high

[–] average_joe@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

How do they even block it? Dns filter or they also block the hosting server?

[–] Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 2 months ago

its just missing dns entrys.

if you configure anything other than your providers default dns server you don't notice it.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Italy also has DNS filtering, but they recently added IP blocking for some sports streaming websites. This had terrible consequences

[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This had terrible consequences

Ha, they never learn. They also blocked most of Cloudflare in Austria a few years back.

Fun fact: It was the first IP block they tried. They haven't tried again since then.

https://blog.cloudflare.com/consequences-of-ip-blocking/

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

🤣 Boomers at PC = a mess

[–] junusdenised420@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Just dns blocks, s.to for example has a site dedicated to lising all domains of theirs and ways to change your dns server which isnt blocked afaik. serien.domains if you wanna check it out

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So these are blocked on a DNS Level? So just using a different DNS (like 9.9.9.9 or 1.1.1.1 or 8.8.8.8) will get around this „block“

[–] Tja@programming.dev 13 points 2 months ago

From the article

To address the alleged censorship part, the site also links to various options available to the public to circumvent the blocking efforts. This includes switching to third party DNS resolvers.

[–] c0smokram3r@midwest.social 7 points 2 months ago

👏👏👏

[–] GatoEscobar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 months ago

The webaite is well designed for a 17 year old, or at least for someone to at least attempt the cause.

https://cuiiliste.de/