this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
141 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3079 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am cautiously optimistic about this.

First, the reasons not to be:

  • The Kennedy name might conceivably attract some confused Democratic votes.
  • His spoiler candidacy will obviously be targeted at Biden supporters and intended to siphon them away.

But I'm still cautiously optimistic because:

  • We already have a well-known guy with the last name "Kennedy" in the Senate: This absolute tool, a Louisiana Republican and all-around douchebag that Democrats universally despise. So name recognition effects may be blunted a bit.
  • RFK's poll numbers in the Democratic primary as a hypothetical alternative to Biden have stayed consistently 45-50 points below Biden. Most Democrats aren't going to jump ship to a hopeless independent candidacy and cede the race to Trump.
  • RFK is immensely popular... with deranged wingnuts who still believe the COVID vaccines have microchips in them and are the sign of the Beast. These people weren't gonna vote Biden in the first place, and there might be enough of them in the Republican party for RFK's candidacy to be a Trump spoiler instead.

I'm going to be paying really close attention to see which side he siphons from more, but like I said... I'm cautiously optimistic RFK will have a more damaging effect on Trump than on Biden.

If Trump goes after him hard, I'll take that as confirmation that Trump is worried about that.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can we convince the Q people that he's the other dead Kennedy they are waiting for in disguise?

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's it! JFK is secretly immortal! He faked his own death and assumed the identity of his son! The real RFK is off investigating pizzeria basements to rescue children on behalf of his father!

Rejoice, Q! Your savior has actually already emerged! Vote RFK to support the true Trump, not the holographic impostor he's been replaced with, and the Great Awakening will arrive with the Storm and... fuck, I can't keep this up.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I got you.

The Great Awakening is upon us. The lizard-people will be exposed. All our enemies will be rounded up and sent to gitmo. All the people who laughed at you for believing "ridiculous" things will realize that you are super smart and apologize. We will be vindicated.

Oh, wait. Not rejoice Q. Rejoice Anons! RFK Jr is actually JFK, but better. He will become president and Trump will become God-Emperor of the world. Those Iraqi Dinars that you invested in will finally make you super rich! No more babies will ever be eaten by democrats and the cabal shall be no more.

Ok, I'm tapping out.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You did great. It almost made me throw up a little in my mouth, so... Job well done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Such an obvious spoiler. Who is going to vote for him?

[–] Neato@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Old, confused Democrats? He's not really leftist at all. Everything I've heard about him makes me feel like he's a Republican.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Single-issue anti-vaxxer voters might trust him more than they trust Trump. (and none of them were going to vote for Biden anyway, so probably at worst a wash for Biden)

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is my dad. He doesn't like trump but still suffers from all kinds of other anti-progrsssive brainwashing.

He thinks RFK is a brave outsider.

He also voted for Perot, so take that for what it's worth.

Well, the D's know the name of the game is beat Trump, that's how biden got nominated, nobody actually liked him. They'll vote for Biden no matter what just to make sure Trump doesn't win.

The target demographic for this guy are Trump independents, that is, the people that won him the election in the rust belt in 2016, people who lean Democrat but were sick of the politicians and their constant bullshitting. So it's likely RFK is a way to spoil Trump, not the D's.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Hopefully Republicants.

[–] DemBoSain@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

He has massive support among the wingnut right. The Ben Garrison/Kill Fauci/J6 is a Hoax crowd.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Morons.

"But aren't all the morons already voting for Trump?" I hear you say.

No. There are always more morons.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He will vote for himself, and his mother is still around and will probably vote for him.

So I am expecting him to get exactly 2 votes.

[–] JaymesRS@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

An unfortunately significant number of people.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Really? I have not seen any evidence of that.

[–] Zippy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it might be hard to predict exactly but I I am bit with you. Those right leaning independents that don't like Trump are quite unlikely to vote for him regardless. But that known name may put Biden as their second choice.

[–] chaogomu@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (8 children)

All of Kennedy's platform positions are firmly right-wing... and so is all of his support. He should have been part of the Republican debate, he'd have fit right in.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

The guy is crazy, but that doesn't seem to be a problem anymore.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Democrats who don't think Biden is far enough to the right. They'll still blame progressives if Biden loses to Trump, though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 30 points 1 year ago

It’s the only move he has, he’d never get the Dem nomination. Too many see right through his conspiracy nonsense.

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude is a stain on the Kennedy name. Dude thinks wifi gives cancer.

[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sadly still more coherent than Trump, who said that the noise from windmillls causes cancer.

https://apnews.com/article/25ff42c9747043b3b80e098a0f90b1d5

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Good luck. Get all the Roswell and COVID conspiracy theorists in a pile, and baby...you got A STEW GOIN

[–] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Good. The lunatic vote will split between him and Trump.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

At least he has given up the farce of pretending to be a Democrat

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For now at least, polls show about 25% of Democrats would vote for him over Biden vs 13% of Republicans. This is bad.

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-faces-disastrous-defeat-if-rfk-jr-runs-third-party-candidate-1828858

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's over a year from the election. Polls right now mean nothing.

[–] CapgrasDelusion@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's more the lopsidedness than the numbers themselves that concerns me. It would only take an extraordinarily small difference to hand the election to Trump with how close it was last time and is now. But I'll try to use the optimism from this thread to smother my cynicism for now.

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

41 percent of Democrats have an at least somewhat favorable view of Kennedy

Yeah, no. I'd guess that only a single-digit % of Democrats - mostly Extremely Online ones - have any idea who he is; this is a survey where they pressed for lukewarm responses from mostly-uninformed voters and then pretended that it actually reflected public opinion in a meaningful way.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

These debates are going to be wild. Trump and Kennedy just screaming gibberish at each other while Biden stands between them with the quietly desperate look of a pensioner trying to remember his PIN number at the supermarket checkout.

Fucking hell.

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Nah. Biden's still sharp. He's gonna turn to the cameras, give a sparkling smile, and say, "Get a load of these guys, right?"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

I doubt Kennedy (or Cornell West) will be included in any debates.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

We need to make this guy the poster child for ranked choice voting. With it he'd only be wasting donor money, not endangering our future as a spoiler candidate.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

He knows he has no chance of being the Democrat nominee. Not too shocking.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

his grift is going the LLC route

load more comments
view more: next ›