this post was submitted on 28 Aug 2024
188 points (98.5% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3781 readers
1525 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.

Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!

Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.

Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
Stamets@lemmy.world
FlyingSquid@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world
The_Picard_Maneuver@startrek.website
negativenull@lemmy.world
188
Nailed It! (dubvee.org)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by ptz@dubvee.org to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I may not know much about warp theory, but I do know the Nebula Class looks ridiculous.

Imagine the TNG opening but with the Nebula Class Enterprise D zooming across and also the theme is played on a tuba.

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I fucking love all the kitbash ships and shuffled part ships.

Especially the ugly kitbashes.

I always thought the nebula class was neat. The mission pod is cool. Being able to swap out for combat or sensors or whatever else you need by heading to a space dock, pressing a few buttons and waiting for the worker bees to swap them out in half an hour or less (or your dilithium back)

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I love the Nebula-class and I will stand with you against the slander in this comment section.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 6 points 2 months ago

Some people make it obvious they never built model ships (possibly in bottles) when they were young.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Kitbashing is a time honored tradition. I just assumed everyone who works at Utopia Planitia really loved model making as kids.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

True, true.

But the Nebula Class looks like either a Galaxy Class assembled while drunk or they never unpacked it from its shipping configuration:

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Flat-packed starships

A study model prototype of the USS Excelsior with four warp nacelles.

[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Did nobody else make ships in bottles when they were boys?

[–] Jimbo@yiffit.net 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I did sir

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I did. I really did.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I was never a boy.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I feel like Mariner would say something like, "No, why would I waste time doing that when I could just replicate one?"

[–] YaDownWitCPP@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

One or two. Had to stop when I became a girl though (for obvious reasons).

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

No, what were the reasons?

[–] Mwallerby@startrek.website 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And of course if they'd given it saucer separation that wouldn't look even more goofy, nope, not at all

[–] teft@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looks like ET.

[–] RunningInRVA@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

You look like ET

[–] Clepsydrae@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I opened the link on my phone and it scaled the images horizontally. Squart Class:

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 2 months ago

It looks like a real life version of a chibi version of the anime version of the enterprise D.

And I'm not sure how I feel that that's my first thought...

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's a few other derpy ships. This ship in Prodigy is apparently Centaur Class. What is being done to it is probably for the best.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I realize the AI upscaler used here had a very bad case of pareidolia, but I, too, always thought the Klingon battle cruisers looked like derpy smiley emojis wearing sombreros:

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

When I see Voyager all I can see is :D in the deflector dish. Looks more like :0 at this angle, though.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Janeway: “It’s right behind me, isn’t it?”

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I kind of.. want one.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wasn’t the inspiration for this also the Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye since they’re meant to be science craft with large sensor arrays?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_E-2_Hawkeye

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I have no idea, but that would definitely be plausible.

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I always thought so but can’t find where I may have read that from… maybe just an assumption I made because it looks like it and they are often used in science/sensor roles

[–] SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Found it. The AWACS.

https://memory-alpha.fandom.com/wiki/Nebula_class_model

The design upgrades for the Nebula-class were done by Mike Okuda and Rick Sternbach and the model was built by Greg Jein. In Drexler's blog, Okuda elaborated further: "As so often happens with this kind of project, we didn't give Greg enough time to accomplish this, so we decided to retain the original scale of the Galaxy-class ship saucer. I suggested the original 'AWACS' pod in response to a producer's observation that the ship might otherwise appear unbalanced. Unfortunately, the AWACS pod didn't look as elegant as we had hoped in "The Wounded".

[–] clearedtoland@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Pffft. Who needs an owners manual when you have red shirts to sacrifice while you learn?

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Red shirts are command by TNG era. It would be the gold shirts (engineering and ops) that would be sacrificed to the dark lord of starship construction.

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thinking about it, I feel like having the nacelles as close to the middle of the ship might actually make more sense. If they're creating a warp bubble around them, it would be centred on the nacelle, so having it centrally placed would balance the 'amount' of warp bubble around the entire ship

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 2 points 2 months ago

The old school justification for ship designs having the nacelles far from crew-occupied parts of the ship was that they were powerfully dangerous. That really isn't a thing any more, which has freed the model designers to make some creative new shapes, which is pretty cool. (I still love the iconic old designs though.)