this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
120 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2665 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A general strike in Israel to protest the failure to return hostages held in Gaza led to closures and other disruptions around the country on Monday, but it was ignored in some areas, reflecting deep political divisions.

Israel’s largest trade union, the Histadrut, called for the general strike, the first since the start of the war. It aimed to shut down or disrupt major sectors of the economy, including banking, health care and the country’s main airport. But it ended early after a labor court ruled it must stop in mid-afternoon in response to a government petition calling the strike politically motivated.

Hundreds of thousands of Israelis poured into the streets Sunday in grief and anger after six hostages were found dead in Gaza. The families and much of the public blamed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, saying they could have been returned alive in a deal with Hamas to end the nearly 11-month-old war.

top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 43 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Israel is one of the major intelligence hub in the world. So how did the October 7 attack happen if that was true?

Netanyahu allowed it. Look at the Wikipedia page. He knew. He sacrificed his own people and allowed it to happen.

Egypt said it warned Israel days before the attack that "an explosion of the situation [was] coming, and very soon, and it would be big."[81] Israel denied receiving such a warning,[82] although Michael McCaul, Chairman of the US House Foreign Relations Committee, said that warnings were given three days before the attack.[83]

That's two countries saying Israel knew days before the attack.

According to The New York Times, Israeli officials had obtained detailed attack plans more than a year before the attack.

The New York Times, who spread propaganda for Israel, said Israel knew.

The Times reported, "Hamas followed the blueprint with shocking precision." According to The Times, the document was widely circulated among Israeli military and intelligence leadership, who largely dismissed the plan as beyond Hamas's capabilities, though it was unclear whether the political leadership was informed.

The Times is a British newspaper. They said the IDF knew and information stopped somewhere in the chain of command. That's two newspapers outside their country that knew the attack was going to happen.

According to a BBC investigation, surveillance reports suggested that Hamas was planning a significant operation against Israel, but senior IDF officers repeatedly ignored the warnings.[99]

BBC is one of biggest news sources in the world. That's three news sources outside Israel that knew more than one of top intelligence sources in the world. Mossad had spies in Hamas and some how thousands of fighters crossed the border.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

October 7th 2023, September 11th, 2001, and December 7th 1941 all supposedly had intelligence reports at least a couple of days prior from foreign sources. I am sensing possible geopolitical motivations here.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here's information from a an Israeli newspaper:

According to Haaretz, Israel's domestic intelligence agency, Shin Bet, and IDF military commanders discussed a possible threat to the Nova music festival near kibbutz Re'im just hours before the attack, but the festival's organizers were not warned.

Haaretz (Hebrew: הָאָרֶץ lit. 'The Land [of Israel]', originally Ḥadshot Haaretz – Hebrew: חַדְשׁוֹת הָאָרֶץ, IPA: [χadˈʃot haˈʔaʁets] lit. 'News of the Land [of Israel]') is an Israeli newspaper. It was founded in 1918, making it the longest running newspaper currently in print in Israel.

[–] killea@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Oh, I concur. Just alluding to historical situations wherein interested parties ignored or withheld information in accordance with a broader agenda.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I see. I thought you were implying international news sources were giving out misinformation for their own agenda. That's why I posted a national newspaper source.

Russia repeatedly ignored intelligence suggesting the Kursk obslast invasion. So there is an even more recent example than the October Hamas terror attacks

[–] mods_mum 9 points 2 months ago

Yup, you have to be childishly naive to believe the Israelis were surprised. It just perfectly played into their hand.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/30/world/middleeast/israel-hamas-attack-intelligence.html

[–] small44@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's just israelis cockiness, they didn't take the threat seriously rather than just allowing it to happen

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Either way they knew and Netanyahu's incompetence got his own people killed. He should not have a job.

The October 7 attack was horrible but it's pretty convenient for Netanyahu to be incompetent at that time. Polls showed most people were against the 2023 Israeli Judicial Reform. One of the most out spoken groups were the millennials and Gen-Zers, the ones most likely to attend the Nova Music Festival.

Attendees described the crowd as mostly consisting of Israelis of ages 20–40 from across the country.

Source: Wikipedia

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Bin Laden determined to attack United States."

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Considering al-Qaeda attacked the World Trade Center twice while bin Laden was general, that statement is correct.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Correct, and Bush ignored the warning.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting Hamas was in favour of the judicial reform?

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, Hamas views on it has nothing to do with what I said.

A war would keep Netanyahu in power longer. War has been used throughout history for people to grab more power and to keep power longer.

An attack at the Nova music festival would get rid of some Israeli civilian opposition to the 2023 Israeli Judicial Reform.

[–] nonailsleft@lemm.ee -4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Do you think he coördinated with either Hamas or the organizers to make sure festival would be hit?

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

I think he has enough undercover Mossad agents in Hamas to influence them which target to attack.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Either way they are lying about it

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

... Well. That was short lived.

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But it ended early after a labor court ruled it must stop in mid-afternoon in response to a government petition calling the strike politically motivated.

When Bibi says he wants it ended, it ends.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This is what their vaunted democracy looks like. The guy committing genocide demands and gets unquestioning silence, and a broken strike.

It's the envy of every last centrist.

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Is there such a thing as a non-politically motivated strike? Isn't that the whole point?

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 6 points 2 months ago

All strikes have to be done during this hours and only for this specific reasons. We don't want to upset anyone with the strikes.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is how to protest people... good for them!

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

They weren't protesting for the sake of the Pelestinians, and they never have so far as I know... So I remain unimpressed.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Do you think Bibi knows the quote "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable"?

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 months ago

There's never a shortage of people willing to risk death and dismemberment to hold on to power.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

This isn't a danger for him. His people support him from what I've seen. They complain about policies that impact their own, but allow genocide to carry out without any notable opposition.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, except he knows the US has his back no matter what he does.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 months ago

His back or Israels? Because as an American, we have a long history of negotiating with presidents who aren't president quite yet.

That said, Netenyahu is not enough of a threat to American interests to justify a regime change peaceful or otherwise.

[–] anas@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Only democracy in the middle east, people aren’t allowed to protest.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Cant wait for the day Israel is treated like an international pariah.

[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

There are passports that has the line “This passport is valid for all countries except Israel”.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

I think they already are in places that don't have UN veto power?

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Since when did Bibi ever listen to the courts? Keep going.

[–] SattaRIP@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 months ago

Again, it's not a war, it's a genocide. And Hamas is just a dogwhistle for Palestinians at this point. Then again, the defense minister iirc said there's no way they can win this war. Why? Cause a full and complete genocide is completely impossible. There are going to be survivors even if they nuked the entire cursed--I mean holy land. The Palestinians have a wide diaspora as well.