this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
730 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18883 readers
3619 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Plum@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Schadenfreude isn't my typical genre, but I could watch a debate a week til the election.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofTophopper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hold onto your butts. Already seeing tons of comments about it's Kamala who is refusing debates. Man, the spin is so crazy

[–] solidgrue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

We should find a way to harness all that spin to generate electricity. We'd solve ~~global warming~~ climate change in 5 years

[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

But he just said he won, why would he back out from such an easy victory? 🫠😂

[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

If he debates again he’ll get destroyed but if he doesn’t he looks weak. His debates have zero impact on his base.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago

Get fucked, Donald.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

At least he's smart enough not to get his ass handed to him twice until election day.

[–] XOXOX@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

He's not smart, his ego just can't handle everyone, everywhere seeing what a loser he is.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If Harris pulls away in the polls, he'll come crawling back.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I say this is the best outcome. Keep the absolute disaster of a debate the biggest thing people think about when they compare the two candidates for as long as possible.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

What about a vice-presidential debate—is that still in the works?

[–] troed@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's fine. We're tired of all the winning anyway.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

She hurt his feelings that fucking bad yo.

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Lol. What a chicken shit.

[–] Asidonhopo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Still the Vance-Walz debate Oct 1 for some potential change for either candidacy. Voters think they know both VP picks but we won't really know who we're dealing with til they go head to head.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

🐣🐥🐤🐔🍗

CNBC - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNBC:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/09/12/trump-rejects-second-harris-debate.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›