this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
196 points (97.6% liked)

Psychology

214 readers
3 users here now

Come talk about psychology and related disciplines.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

~~Mark Zuckerberg~~ The Tobacco Industry says there’s ‘no causal connection’ between ~~social media~~ Smoking and teen ~~mental~~ respiratory health.

There...fixed it.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (2 children)

didn't tobacco companies once refute a causal connection between smoking and lung cancer?

what else is he going to say? that he knows he's profiting from pouring poisonous sludge into all our lives?

Worse. They had these big, decades-long gaslighting campaigns, selling cigarettes as "good for you" because they "calm" you down, make you look cool and lower your blood pressure, etc.

[–] trevor@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And, even though Big Tobacco was obviously lying, they sewed enough doubt to keep the topic as an issue of debate for decades after we knew it was dangerous.

Zuck is likely doing the same because it works.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Oil companies too. Honestly, the tobacco industries bullshit is pretty foundational to any communications studies.

It's something we should all keep in mind when whenever we are subject to corporate communications/public relations.

Mark Zuckerberg is the stereotypical CEO: lying, ignorant, and indifferent about the wellbeing of humans, as long as it generates profits.

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

I'm an adult and I feel it.

[–] MagnyusG@lemmy.world 69 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Even if he was right, his word can't be taken seriously because of his position. He's never going to admit his product is actually detrimental.

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 45 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Tobacco exec: it's not cancerous

Oil exec: lead additives are safe

Social media exec: no harm to your kids psychology

[–] nolannice@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sonic Team exec: we won't make you a furry

[–] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Shit, what did I miss?

[–] Rivalarrival 7 points 2 days ago

I've read dozens upon dozens of claims that social media was harmful, and always dismissed them as Karen nonsense, "think of the children" bullshit, or "kids these days" boomer ignorance.

Today, for the first time, I have started to believe there might actually be some truth to the idea.

[–] arockinyourshoe@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ditching facebook sure improved my mental health. wasting time is one thing, but wasting it on infuriating bullshit is just fucking stupid

[–] zephorah@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

FBM is the only reason it’s still alive.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

And events. I use it to follow a bunch of places that have musical events or drinking contests. But I don't have a single friend, and I only check it once a week or so to see what's coming up.

[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

Best joke of the day.

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah because it's more than a casual connection

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Causal, not casual. Same sentiment though, there is a proven link and of course he doesn't think that's a problem because he sells the problem.

[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago

I had to see the person correcting you to realise myself.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That got a laugh out of me so well done for that misstske, casual connection 😁!

[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

He is the right one who ought to tell us! /s

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He's right, there's no "casual" connection. In fact, it's a definite connection.

[–] tfw_no_toiletpaper@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago

Lol everyone knows there is, even the kids

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

"Wolf says there's 'no causal connection' between him being there and a declining sheep population."

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Emotionless Android in human skin cites results of programming sub-routine to conclude state of human mental wellbeing.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Torment Nexus creator claims the Torment Nexus is not dangerous

[–] AtomicHotSauce@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The collapse of society and its ensuing extermination of his kind is gonna be cool.

[–] Chefdano3@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

I would love to believe that, but instead I can't help but believe a collapse of society would just put these people in an even higher level of control. They have the most starting resources, so they'll have an advantage starting over, and with no rules or restrictions, it will be bad for everyone else.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the oil industry said to the world for decades that pollution wouldn't cause climate change. Yet here we are.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

True. There's a pretty direct connection.

[–] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That would be what causal means mate.