this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
108 points (89.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
3075 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Troy Nehls, from Texas, calls Trump ‘the greatest president of my lifetime’ and says he will nominate him to replace Kevin McCarthy

A Texas Republican said he would nominate Donald Trump to be the next speaker of the US House of Representatives, after the party completed the unprecedented removal of one of its own, Kevin McCarthy.

Troy Nehls said: “This week, when the US House of Representatives reconvenes, my first order of business will be to nominate Donald J Trump for speaker of the US House of Representatives.

“President Trump, the greatest president of my lifetime, has a proven record of putting America first and will make the House great again.”

The speaker does not have to be a member of Congress, though no speaker has ever assumed the role without holding a seat.

all 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Just when I think things can't get any dumber, here comes a MAGAt to prove me wrong. I would say this is just a stupid stunt that won't get anywhere, but since we're clearly still on the dumbest possible timeline I'm scared he might actually win the position.

From a practical standpoint, if he were to become speaker, would that disqualify him from running for president? Or would it be one of those things where he could just resign if he won?

Here's hoping it's a moot point because he's behind bars soon.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just can't imagine him having a role like that where he's not always the centre of attention but has to listen to other people.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Which raises another interesting question, what happens if he turns down the position?

Edit: Thinking about this more, this entire thing is a really fascinating thought exercise even if him actually getting elected would be just the absolute dumbest possible outcome for many, many reasons, not the least of which would be his complete and total inability to actually do the job.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Frankly this is precisely why I’d like to see him nominated. It would put him under an enormous public spotlight.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

He’d just give a list of stand-ins and never do anything beyond gloat, bloviate, and egg on his white terrorists to put him back in the presidency.

He’s not capable of understanding how to officiate taking a shit on his own. How’s he gonna announce bills?

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bold of you to assume we'll live through it.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Just remember: when you think a MAGAt has hit rock bottom... they own lots of heavy mining equipment and don't give a fuck about the environment.

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The rules say a person under indictment can not hold the position. Now they could try to change the rules, but I don't think they could get enough votes to do it.

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's ok, none of the Republican congressmen know how to read, so silly things like "rules" won't get in their way.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

They didn't let the rules get in the way when they initiated the Biden impeachment.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

They'd need to pick a speaker before they can change the rules, right? I thought the speaker pro tempore can't hold votes on anything but a new speaker.

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You spelled knob wrong.

[–] thesprongler@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only way trump is the greatest president of your lifetime is if you're born in 2017 and die in 2020, presumably in a school shooting.

[–] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Slowly getting sick of that drama queen country.

[–] internet_peasant@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fallout that proceeded the presidential election in 2016. Will be regarded as one of the most significant turning points in American history and political culture. Combine a narcissistic sociopath (Trump) and a global communication platform (insert SV social media company/service). The result is a base of unremarkable individuals who lives revolve around them and their entitled "rights", and anyone that disagrees is automatically the enemy.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And the festering ball of white hot rage because America had the audacity to elect a Black man as President.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Quite a few of them admit it, even - claiming that Obama was "divisive" (lol, really?) and too "extreme" (rotflmao) and that they were forced to vote for donnie as a result, and that donnie being in office is the fault of Obama.

The subtext is really: "other Americans actually voted for a BLAH and we had him for eight years even, and now I'm going to do the worst thing I can think of at the voting booth".

[–] Hazewind@artemis.camp 5 points 1 year ago

I think the fallout of the Obama election would be that. Trump is just the latest evolution of the tea party that swept the midterms after.

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Like the game you play with your friends around fortune cookies, where you add "in bed" at the end, any metaphor about America needs to end in "with a gun".

Drama queen with a gun feels about right.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Someone should nominate Obama.

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

As much as I'd love that, I hope the Democrats just keep nominating "HAKEEEEEEM JEFFERIES!"

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Does he actually want another loss under his belt?

[–] elshanerino@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I've reached a point where I mentally substitute "Dumbass" for "Republican" in any sentence I read, and I'm delighted to report that my usage seems to improve clarity and readability.

give it a shot.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Obvious coordinated coup noises

[–] spiderkle@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let's say these old farts manage to somehow fuck things up even harder for the rest of us, what's their "optimal-outcome-scenario" played out to it's full conclusion? Are we talking "Handmaid's Tale" or "1984"?

[–] TechyDad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dictatorship run by MAGA Republicans. First by Trump, until he "graciously decides to give up the office." (Read: drops dead on the throne.)

No education is allowed unless the MAGAs approve of it. In addition, science is distrusted. Companies flee the country as all scientific progress not only grinds to a halt, but reverses.

Kids are essentially taught "white Christian men are better than anyone else." Using coded language at first until they get bolder. Slavery? That was just A job opportunity program for Black people.

Anyone who isn't deemed MAGA enough doesn't get to vote until they go to a re-education camp. There you'll learn that been LGBTQ is a mental illness, believing in any religion other than Christianity sends you to hell, and a woman that gets raped must have been dressed wrong.

Opposing parties would be allowed to exist at much reduced levels. They wouldn't have any political power, but would be handy scapegoats. Any opposition leader who gained too much of a following would get arrested on some obviously made up charge.

In short, it would be a Christian Theocracy mixed with Russian Authoritarianism.

[–] spiderkle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Very well put. The terrifying thing is, that all of those steps are already being put into effect.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

There is no fascist utopia. It's not a promise for a better world, but one of constant struggle.

From Orwell's 1940 review of Mein Kampf: https://bookmarks.reviews/george-orwells-1940-review-of-mein-kampf/

Suppose that Hitler’s programme could be put into effect. What he envisages, a hundred years hence, is a continuous state of 250 million Germans with plenty of ‘living room’ (i.e. stretching to Afghanistan or thereabouts), a horrible brainless empire in which, essentially, nothing ever happens except the training of young men for war and the endless breeding of fresh cannon-fodder . . . Also he has grasped the falsity of the hedonistic attitude to life. Nearly all western thought since the last war, certainly all ‘progressive’ thought, has assumed tacitly that human beings desire nothing beyond ease, security and avoidance of pain . . . Hitler, because in his own joyless mind he feels it with exceptional strength, knows that human beings don’t only want comfort, safety, short working-hours, hygiene, birth-control and, in general, common sense; they also, at least intermittently, want struggle and self-sacrifice, not to mention drums, flags and loyalty-parades. However they may be as economic theories, Fascism and Nazism are psychologically far sounder than any hedonistic conception of life.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A Texas Republican said he would nominate Donald Trump to be the next speaker of the US House of Representatives, after the party completed the unprecedented removal of one of its own, Kevin McCarthy.

Trump’s name has been floated before, including during the 15-vote marathon rightwingers put McCarthy through in January before allowing him to take up the gavel.

Trump is the clear frontrunner in the Republican presidential primary, notwithstanding 91 criminal charges (for election subversion, retention of classified information and hush-money payments) and civil threats including a New York fraud trial and a defamation trial in the same city arising from a rape allegation a judge said was “substantially true”.

In a book published on Tuesday, the author Michael Lewis reported that the disgraced cryptocurrency billionaire Sam Bankman-Fried considered offering Trump $5bn to step aside.

Jim Jordan of Ohio, a possible candidate for speaker, told Hannity: “He’d be great, but actually I want Donald Trump to be the next president of the United States.

David Frum, a former aide to George W Bush, pointed to House ethics rules, saying: “Why Trump won’t take the speaker job in one Google search.”


The original article contains 479 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Troy Nehls is a year older than me and I can confidently say, Trump isn't the greatest President of EITHER of our lifetimes.

He's not even the greatest REPUBLICAN President of our lifetimes.

[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

He's not even the greatest president of anyone's lifetime, including, theoretically, vampires, Highlanders and elves.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

he wasn't a good president at all that's really the truth of it