this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
200 points (92.7% liked)

Science Memes

11440 readers
1166 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 100 points 2 months ago (3 children)

As Wiktionary puts it:

The word data is more often used as an uncountable noun with a singular verb than as a plural noun with singular datum.

It's like "hair". You can hold a single 'hair', you can also hold three hairs. But if you're looking at an entire mane, you ain't counting, so it's referred to as "hair" again.

[–] AccountMaker@slrpnk.net 17 points 2 months ago

Yeah, but for example, IEEE conference paper templates explicitly state "The word 'data' is plural, not singilar". So if you use it with a singular verb you will receive this post in an email and you can only say thank you and change it.

[–] averyminya@beehaw.org 8 points 2 months ago

The piece of data and the data overall suggest that...

Over categorization is a lie that only causes more problems. Stop the forcing of categorizing things. Just let things exist.

[–] tulliandar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And the word “data” is only one word, so “data is plural”

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm whooshed, but you understand the concept of uncountable nouns, right?

[–] tulliandar@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The noun I’m referring to is the word “data” not the data themselves. “Data data” is 2 words, “data” is one word. The word (singular) “data” is plural

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In Latin, sure. But the word "datum" isn't a part of English, so we have instead the uncountable noun "data" which is derived from the Latin.

[–] EffortlessEffluvium@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Datum is indeed a word in English. Singular point of information.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok... Data are a character on Star Trek.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't that be a correct thing to say if Data uses singular they/them pronouns?

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Three whole hours and the descriptivists haven't come by to tell us there are no rules to language. This might be a record.

[–] my_hat_stinks@programming.dev 12 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There definitely are rules to language, which are determined by how the language is actually used. The issue with prescriptivists is that they invent their own rules which often go against how the language is used, i.e. the rules are nonsense.

Take the "less vs fewer" argument. Everyone happily uses 'less' in pretty much the same way for nearly a millennium, then some prescriptivist asswipe comes along and says they don't like it so now there's a rule. Prescriptivists spend the next couple of centuries yelling about their new rule and creaming themselves over how they're now 'better' at the language than other people while everyone else just doesn't give a fuck and continue to speak normally.

In the end language is just a tool to communicate ideas. If you clearly understood someone but whine because they ignored your made up rules you're the asshole.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

i'd say the bigger issue with prescriptivists is that they don't think the rules of language are allowed to change, nor are you allowed to violate the rules.

Everyone must speak exactly the same language, dialects are verboten and so is change.

[–] Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk 1 points 2 months ago

I thought it would be fewer

[–] LynneOfFlowers@midwest.social 13 points 2 months ago

I guess I tend to use data as a mass noun when referring to computer data ("there's a lot of data on that drive") and as a regular noun when referring to data in the scientific sense ("these data show xyz")

[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'm kinda getting the urge to lick between this guy's front teeth just to see what it feels/tastes like.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 17 points 2 months ago

I'm getting the urge to run screaming and call the authorities.

[–] m4xie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Ew so disgusting. Why would you even suggest something like that???

[–] Zoomboingding@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

This is just an datum point

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

Data is as data does.

[–] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Anyone asked data how they identify themselves?

[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 1 points 2 months ago

I have switched to just saying dataset