this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
-40 points (22.2% liked)

politics

19107 readers
2718 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Harris initially said that “not a thing comes to mind” that she would have done anything differently than Biden. But then she went on to elaborate.

“Listen, I plan on having a Republican in my Cabinet,” Harris elaborated. “You ask me what’s the difference between Joe Biden and me, well that will be one of the differences.”

Then, she appeared to take a jab at Biden, adding, “I don’t feel burdened by letting pride get in the way of a good idea.”

I'd heard the "not a thing" but this is the first I'm hearing she's committing to a Republican in her Cabinent...

That's just fucking insane

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are only two cabinet-level positions that don't require Senate approval. One is already occupied by Tim Walz and the other is WH Chief of Staff, which I very much doubt would be the position Harris has in mind.

If no Democrat uses the filibuster to block this, the filibuster has no purpose but to block progressive legislation.

[–] Walteracc@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 month ago

filibuster has no purpose but to block progressive legislation.

First time?

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It'll be Cheney or Kinzinger.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Jesus, I wish it was obvious if you meant Dick or Liz...

But Hillary and Biden have drug the Dem party so far right both Cheney's have endorsed Harris, and I really wouldn't be surprised

[–] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

She said it at least a few weeks ago. I think it made headlines for like half a day and then Trump said some absolutely crazy shit again so everyone collectively forgot what Harris was doing.

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

As memory serves, she had been asked in an interview if she would, and she gave a somewhat vaguely-worded answer, that she wouldn't rule it out.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

Of course she is, their entire goal since Bill Clinton has to become the dominant party for conservatives.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Prediction: she’s going to make a new cabinet-level office for combating misaligned AIs, and put Arnold Schwarzenegger in charge.

[–] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

I'd be all for a "Department of Science and Technology" which would be about safeguarding citizen's rights in the digital era, ensuring ethical tech practices, helps businesses and the government stay up to date with NIST standards, and making a national transistor backup in case we have a solar wind/flair hit us like the 1800s one that set electrical grids on fire.

It was one of the few things from Andrew Yang's "run" for the Democratic Nomination that I was interested in and wondering if someone would pick up on it. (Now I know he's a fucking centrist nobody)

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 5 points 1 month ago

We're literally watching the Democrat party continue to push right.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, bad answer, but this close to the election she can't say anything too decisive for fear of alienating undecideds.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

A lot of people planning not to vote aren't doing it because the Dem party isn't to the right enough, it's that they're too far to the right in the first place.

If that wasn't true, Republicans would bolster a 3rd party just to the right of the Dems to syphon off votes instead of a "far left" party. Or they'd at least move back to the center to fight for those mythic middle ground "undecideds".

Instead they've never stopped sprinting right and gained votes overall because they're embracing their actual extremists.

Meanwhile Dems can't get a candidate that wants M4A or one that's against Trump's border wall.

Crossing those lines costs the Dem.party votes. More than we're gaining.

It might not be so bad, depending on the actual choice (and that assumes that this actually happens rather than being walked back).

But for example I imagine a lot of Dems would be okay with Liz Cheney being a cabinet member.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Unless you're a centrist or a republican. Or Netanyahu.

And more similar to Obama...

Republican Ray LaHood served as secretary of transportation from 2009 to 2013 under President Barack Obama.

In fact, it was Biden who once considered going even further (though obviously this did not happen in the end), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/02/opinion/joe-biden-2020-republicans.html

If he had went thru with that, this year's election would be ... interesting.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

New Republic - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New Republic:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://newrepublic.com/post/186923/kamala-harris-biggest-difference-biden
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

What is everyone having for breakfast today? I'm thinking about having a toasted bagel wth peanut butter.

[–] echo@lemmings.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Troll-bait headline means we don't need to read the article to know that it's a bunch of bullshit.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago

asked what her biggest difference with President Joe Biden is—and she gave a surprising answer: She plans to appoint a Republican to her Cabinet.

You need to read the article to stay informed. The only bullshit here is Kamala.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

During Kamala Harris’s Tuesday appearance on The View, the vice president was asked what her biggest difference with President Joe Biden is—and she gave a surprising answer: She plans to appoint a Republican to her Cabinet.

Harris initially said that “not a thing comes to mind” that she would have done anything differently than Biden. But then she went on to elaborate.

“Listen, I plan on having a Republican in my Cabinet,” Harris elaborated. “You ask me what’s the difference between Joe Biden and me, well that will be one of the differences.”