this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
766 points (97.2% liked)

politics

24875 readers
3238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Heresy_generator@kbin.social 151 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Nine theists decide whether or not theists should have special rights. Does that seem right to you?

[–] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 92 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I always thought it was pretty far out for a contemporary democracy to have lifelong appointments with the word "supreme" in the title.

In the rest of the world this usually indicates something well divorced from democracy.

[–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 43 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I’m a Christian that was raised on the ideology of the separation of Church and State and I’ve never understood why extremist Christian rhetoric determines so many of our laws. Almost the ENTIRE debate on abortion comes down to Christian ideologies - ideologies that we ourselves can’t fully agree on but insist on pushing onto others. My philosophy is the golden rule of doing unto others and all that. Condemnation is why we get a bad wrap and so many of us spit in Jesus’ face by constantly judging and condemning others for things we don’t agree with or even just don’t understand.

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

Similar background, but I was always strongly encouraged to read scripture myself. When I started pointing out how the scripture was pretty clearly in opposition to most popular Christian dogmas, it wasn't the dogmas that were seen as the problem, it was ME for pointing them out.

Scripture is pro-abortion, it does not condemn homosexuality in any way, it does not contain even the concept of hell, nor does it does not support the concept of heaven as an afterlife destination; but it does demand you always treat others with respect and dignity (even your mortal enemies!) and that you worry about your own failings rather than others. You are to live by example, not edict or meddling.

Modern "Christians" are not followers of Christ, but enemies. They spit on his teachings and the scriptures. They are an army of anti-christ cultists.

"And I will tell them bluntly: You were never one of mine. Get out of here, you criminal trash." - Matthew 7:23

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

That was growing up on Judaism. Those things weren't even a conversation.

[–] PilferJynx@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It feels like Christians are anti-christian, as if a hate demon infiltrated and corrupted thier own faith. Does all organized faith end up this way? Or has always been this way from a deceitful inception.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 17 points 2 years ago (10 children)

I like your honesty, but Christianity has a core problem in that its holy texts can be interpreted in a myriad of ways. There is no "plain reading," except when it suits someone's designs (and if it comes down to that, it's often to the detriment of individuals or society at large).

On top of that, the doctrine that "God's laws are above human laws" is what has given rise to special treatment of Christians; it's why pastors routinely are able to hide sexual abuse and then make a public show of contrition; it's why churches can be classified as 503c charities, yet are not compelled to follow the same strict transparency guidelines as secular 503c's.

The foundation of Christianity is too malleable and too easily weaponized by ambitious villains, and I wish more lovely people like you would stand up, say, "Enough!" and then do something about it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

You people are real fucking quiet in the face of Christian Nationalism. You either need better PR or silently can't wait for the "kingdom of God" to take over and wipe us atheists out finally.

[–] finkrat@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

We try but we're facing the same horde of angry assholes you are. And no help from the pulpit. We're a pretty small minority.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I apologize but I’m not sure I understand. If you mean “us people” as a whole, then I can’t deny that a lot of the anger is justified. The Christian banner has been used to say and do a lot of terrible shit by evil and misguided people. I may not agree with your stance, but I respect your free will and right to believe what you believe. You have as much a right to exist as anybody else does.

[–] GreenMario@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn it I wanna be mad. 😡

You're ok though.

[–] MTLion3@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

🤣 Thanks. You’re ok too. Everything is so fucked up now and so much of the shit we see and hear every day just stokes the fire. It’s easy to be mad at things we shouldn’t - I do it too. You have a good one, alright?

[–] oatscoop@midwest.social 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I love demanding action from random people for the words and actions of assholes because they belong to some incredibly diverse group that also contains shitheads. It's so much easier than having to recognize people as individuals with their own values and judge them accordingly.

I'm going to go accost some hippie Universal Unitarians and demand they answer for the Westboro Baptist church. Maybe do the same to some Muslims and Jews later.

[–] HopeOfTheGunblade@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Because they organized and acted on a long-term plan, supported by a political party that courted them for votes.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Those aren't even ordinary theists, as you would find them in most places. But extreme Christians (nutcases) that have run explicitly on a platform of giving Christianity and Christians special privileges.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Nope. At least 3 of the judges should be (open) atheists if Americans were to have proper representation.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As an atheist and a Jew I'm really tired of being doubly second-class in this country.

[–] charliespider@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I'm confused... if you converted to Judaism, would you be a Jewish Jew? Or Jew²? Or Power Jew? Just curious 🤔

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ethnic Jew, Spiritual Atheist

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Hell of a build!

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Jesus Christ, ~~Son of God~~ Power Jew

[–] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Soon they will try to outlaw atheism

[–] Jessvj93@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It already is in some places, as in if you are an atheist you cannot run for office.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Pretty soon it will be, oh sure you're allowed to stone someone to death as long as you're doing it in accordance with your sincerely held religious beliefs.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Thranduil@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I just want shakira law where the hips dont lie

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Look. I'd had a lovely supper, and all I said to my wife was, "That piece of halibut was good enough for Jehovah."

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Its my sincerely held religious beliefs that these people should have their face beat with a hammer.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

Sharia law.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 22 points 2 years ago

No taxation without (fair) representation.

Throw these turds in the bay.

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Freedom is a two-way street. Remember that one person's freedom ends where another begins, and vice versa. If that line is ever allowed to be crossed, freedom ceases to exist. Allowing discrimination (based on inherent human traits) crosses that line.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

There's no free speech quite like Christian free speech ⚔️

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Well, obviously xtians have had their special privileges eroded enough as is, it's long overdue that their unwarranted special privileges are enshrined.

load more comments
view more: next ›