this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
17 points (94.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26778 readers
1389 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Are song titles alone (not when used with other things) subject to trademark?

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stinerman@midwest.social 9 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

No. A trademark is to tell a customer that a certain good was made by a certain person or company. This is prevent confusion over which company makes a thing. It's why you can't create an operating system kernel and call it Linux. You can create a clothing company and call it Linux though because no one would be confused that Linux clothing is in any way related to the computer operating system component.

Band names can and are trademarked. So you can't call your new band "The Beatles" or "Five Finger Death Punch". Titles are subject to copyright though, which is a separate thing altogether.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] BitSound@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Definitely not. There's a whole genre of music that's created for riding the coattails of popular songs. They wait for a song title by artists like Taylor Swift to be announced and then release their own songs with the same title. Sometimes they're actually good, like this dude:

https://genius.com/artists/Only-fire

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can have 40 songs all named the same. No legal recourse. IANAL, JAM.

(Just a musician).

[–] eth0slash0@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Speaking of song names, Anal Jam sounds like an extreme dark metal song.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Anal- I think you can call your song "Mr. Brightside" or "Paint it Black" if you really want. Idk why you would though..

[–] IronKrill@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't say I see many people using the "ANAL" acronym in lowercase... lol

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

It always used to be IANAL on reddit. Why did they drop the I?

[–] emax_gomax@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, you'd make your version basically impossible to search for unless it massively blows up

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

The general consensus of the internet seems to be no, although this surely varies to some degree based on the laws in whichever country you're in.

Before anyone tries the other avenue of attack, titles to things generally cannot be copyrighted, either. Content of a work can be, but the name of it cannot.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Not a lawyer, probably depends on context.