this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
85 points (95.7% liked)

Asklemmy

43681 readers
2328 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't think I'm here to complain about rizz or skibidi toilet etc. Thats all fine by me.

The term I dislike strongly is 'eeeh' before you make a statement disagreeing with someone. (This is over text only). Now maybe I've been pavloved bc it's always used by someone disagreeing. But I'm happy with people disagreeing with me normally its just the 'eeeh' or 'erm' that annoys me.

So what's a random term that annoys you?

PS. Saying "eeeh actually 'eeh' is a perfectly fine term" would be a ridiculously easy joke and I will judge you for making it. And I know atleast one person will. Especially bow that I've said all this.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FriendBesto@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"It is what it is."

It is lazy, circular, a cop out and means next to nothing. Vague enough to pass as a wise quip, to some. It is not.

Also not so much a saying per sé, but people who use quotes of famous people at the bottom or ends of emails. As if that implies a personality. If you are going to use something you think sounds smart, at least try to come up with that something yourself.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

Enshittification. Everyone just learned a new word and has to use it at least once in every comment section to feel smart.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

But yet it explains so much about the modern world. All this time we’ve been abused and mistreated, had our data collected and income extracted in so many scammy ways ….. and now we have a word that fits it so perfectly

[–] Belly_Beanis@hexbear.net 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Okay but if we use "Late stage capitalism and the quest for profit above all else is causing the quality of goods and commodities to drop while their value stays the same or goes up," it's going to result in 20 minutes trying to explain things correctly followed by 20 hours of anti-communist arguments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's the enshittification of internet discussion

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 13 hours ago

Literally could care less.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

'Should of" instead of "should've"

[–] LowtierComputer@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Oh God that's got to be the worst one.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Not specifically a word, but i hate when people mix english with their native language

Its especially worse when they use words that are nearly identical

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] miracleorange@beehaw.org 5 points 10 hours ago

Kiddos, especially when used by people in professions that work with kids. Right up there with people who unironically say pupper or doggo. Just say kids.

[–] akkajdh999@programming.dev 2 points 9 hours ago
[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

The exception that proves the rule.

People use it in a way where counterexample proofs that the rule exist when it's supposed to mean that the rule also handles exceptional cases.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago

The replacement of the term “conspiracy theory” with just “conspiracy”.

That’s two different things. If we equate the two semantically we can’t discuss them.

[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 9 points 15 hours ago (4 children)
[–] gerryflap@feddit.nl 1 points 7 hours ago

Oh yeah absolutely. I'm a programmer and I see so many companies and recruiters etc use Cyber instead of Cybersecurity. It drives me absolutely mad, but these type of people drive me mad anyways. It's probably the same crowd who ruined AI by overhyping it into its grave, the same crowd who were hyped by web 3.0 and the whole Blockchain craze, and probably all those other dumb crazes before it.

Still, this cyber thing seems to permeate everything, and I've heard people using the term who I otherwise respect. For me it's a quick way to instantly become very sceptical of whatever follows the term

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I thought you'd never ask!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dirtbiker509@lemm.ee 10 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Please do the needful.

This one really grinds my gears! I think it's because the person can't even be bothered to describe what they want you to do, just go fix it and don't bother me with any details.

[–] Brahvim@lemmy.kde.social 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Indian here. Redditors say that Indians say this a lot. I'd like to tell you that while Indians do use this sentence, it's almost always placed only after a long, somewhat-gone-off-tangent-in-some-places conversation that explained everything well.

Maaaaaaybe it was to convince you without describing tasks, but... mostly, it's not so.

Also, I don't remember hearing it IRL at all. Just felt like I have heard it at least twice in my 18 years of humaning around.

[–] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 8 hours ago

But why use such an awkward construction? Why not "please handle this" or "please take care of this"? Or even "please take the necessary steps to address this"? "Please do the needful" is saying Please [VERB] the [ADJECTIVE]. But the correct construction is to verb a noun. So you need a noun (e.g., "this") to act on.

And additionally, "needful" is an adjective, and rarely ever used anyway. For example, you could probably describe a homeless person as "needful", but it sounds awkward, and most people would say "needy" or "in need."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Pronouncing realtor like "real-uhh-torrrrr"

[–] MonkeMischief 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I cringe so hard at the twitterist carebear-hugbox way of smugly claiming the intellectual high ground and shaming somebody:

"Be better." or "Do better."

The sentiment isn't terrible, but it's prevalent use is obviously just dripping with arrogance and thrown out in the most petty ways. Ugh!

[–] Hugh_Jeggs@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

They're the same types that appear in comment threads with contradictory arguments to literally fucking anything -

"We should save the whales"

"Yes but my cousin got splashed by a whale on a boat trip as a toddler and now has a terrible phobia that makes her wheeze whenever she sees one. Do you want that, is that what you want?"

"We should plan walkable cities"

"OH MY GOD SHES IN A WHEELCHAIR TOO DO YOU ONLY EVER THINK ABOUT YOURSELF YOU ABLEIST"

😂

My theory is that they're just unbelievably bo-o-o-o-oring, humourless people with nothing to add to a conversation but a desperate need for attention

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

"It is what it is"

I get the sentiment behind it, it's just usually so defeatist/dismissive of a situation to me.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

That’s now how people in my subculture use it.

They use it to mean “it’s too late to avoid this problem; let’s talk about things we can change at this point”.

Example:

“If you hadn’t stopped at that rest area the killer never would have slashed our tires”

“Well if you hadn’t jumped for those cheap tires maybe he wouldn’t have been able to slash them with a butter knife”

“And if you’d paid for the triple A we’d have a ride by now”

“Look, it is what it is. Let’s just figure out a way to get back to town without having to follow the road”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

"Oftentimes"

Its always interchangeable with Often. Just use Often.

[–] vext01@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"I could care less" to mean "I could NOT care less"

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 3 points 7 hours ago

Same with "Do you mind doing x?" "Yeah sure"; so you mind doing it? I get what they mean with the response, but it annoys me every time haha

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] keepcarrot@hexbear.net 5 points 16 hours ago

"Completely different" when the two things are actually very similar

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›