this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
980 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19107 readers
4970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 16 points 16 hours ago (7 children)

Everyone talking about billionaires and how they endorse, support, finance, fund, hold lotteries to influence an election and everyone still thinks they exist in a democracy.

It's an oligarchy or a plutocracy

Call it whatever you want ... but it certainly isn't a democracy

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 13 points 16 hours ago

File this under "why billionaires should not exist".

[–] GuyDudeman@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

I saw the first three words of this post and was like, "HOLY SHIT! FINALLY!!"

[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

Dude, same. I almost wanted to stop reading there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

Loving the 8k+ comments of people cancelling their subscription.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Putin overseeing:

Musk, Bezos, Zuckerberg, Trump, The entire GOP.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Bernie was never more right about the billionaires

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

Nooooooo but there's no record of him donating money to trump's campaign therefore he can't be said to be supporting truuuuuuuump Noooooooooo

[–] errer@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago

Coward is afraid of Trump exacting retribution if he wins. Fucking megacoward.

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Key pull quote from TFA:

Post chief executive Will Lewis, in an online explanation of the decision, wrote, “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election. Nor in any future presidential election.”

“We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates,” Lewis wrote.

“We recognize that this will be read in a range of ways, including as a tacit endorsement of one candidate, or as a condemnation of another, or as an abdication of responsibility,” he wrote. “That is inevitable. We don’t see it that way. We see it as consistent with the values The Post has always stood for and what we hope for in a leader: character and courage in service to the American ethic, veneration for the rule of law, and respect for human freedom in all its aspects.”

[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago

What a fuckin hypocrite. I hope he stubs his toe really really hard, then steps on a lego.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 4 points 16 hours ago

The Richest People on EARTH supporting Trump is PROOF that the Middle Class will be BETTER under Trump! Jeff Bezos and Elon Dipshit are KNOWN to Treat their Workers EXTREMELY WELL!

[–] CazzoneArrapante@lemm.ee 1 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

Seize his assets, and if he complains beat him up until he ends up in a wheelchair.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

If Idocracy is a documentary, what does that make Elysium? It seems like we are headed that way more and more.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

coward shit. candyass afraid of a pittance tax bump.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

It's not just about taxes. It's about maintaining his status as an oligarch.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›