this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
365 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
4054 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

This should serve as a lesson to women everywhere that to conservatives, the definition of "trans" is flexible, and that someone is a "woman" only as far as it is politically useful to conservatives.

Look at the attack on the two Olympic athletes this summer. They were cisgender women, but they didn't meet western white beauty standards, and the right needed to find some "trans" athletes to attack, so they labeled cis women trans and demonized them. They still reference them in speeches.

Or these girls in this ad. Just some random cis girl athletes, but it was politically useful to label them trans, so they did.

As the culture war moves ever-more extreme, the definition of "trans" can always be expanded. Remember, 90% of cisgender women are crossdressers according to the traditional definition of the word. 90% of cisgender women regularly wear clothes that would literally have gotten them arrested in many parts of the US only half a century or so ago. It was literally illegal for women to wear pants in many areas. And as the push to confine women to ever-stricter gender roles marches on, any woman that doesn't meet this ever-narrowing standard of beauty can be labeled "trans" and have their rights stripped away.

Are you a woman athlete who looks a bit 'masculine' from years of participating in a contact sport like boxing? You're "trans" and deserve to have your civil rights taken away.

Are you a woman who works in a traditionally male career field? You're "trans" and deserve to have your rights taken away.

Do you wear anything other than dresses, skirts, and other traditionally female clothing? You're "trans" and deserve to have your rights taken away.

Do you want to have any independence at all, have your own bank account, and have any role in life other than daughter, wife, and mother? You're "trans" and deserve to have your rights taken away.

The attack on trans people is a perfect wedge for the right. There is no hard definition for the word "trans," and it can conveniently be defined ever-wider to confine women to ever-narrower ranges of acceptable behavior. When you hear hard right reactionaries talking about declaring being trans illegal or waxing about putting trans people in mental institutions, remember that it wasn't that long ago that cis women that showed any degree of independence were also institutionalized and lobotomized.

In the minds of many hard-right conservatives, 90% of women today are acting in ways that are fundamentally in contradiction to the role of their sex. In their eyes, most women are transgender. And while the narrow edge of the wedge is targeting people who actively seek out overt gender transition, that isn't the real end game.

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 34 points 4 hours ago

He will surely be held accountable for this.

[–] mlfh@lemmy.ml 61 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Those kids and their families should sue the fuck out of him.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

Sadly, these people expect to be sued.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 123 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

He put up an ad with these two girls' pictures and then claimed that they were transgender? What the fuck kind of thinking is that? Does he not care that his supporters would likely beat these girls to death?

[–] celeste@kbin.earth 9 points 2 hours ago

Based on the stuff that went on in the olympics, he'll claim russia told him they had xy chromosomes, so everyone has to argue like that's the absolute truth from then on.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 85 points 6 hours ago

Narrator: "He does not care."

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 46 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

He would cheer them on and say it was a blow against the "trans agenda" or something, i'm sure.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The trans agenda:

  • equity and equality
  • being treated like human beings, complete with dignity and respect
  • brunch
[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

There is no brunch under the heavy yoke of end stage hypercapitalism.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 17 minutes ago

We want ~~bread~~ brunch but also roses

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

"Heidi and I send our empty thoughts and useless prayers to the families of the senseless violence which I caused but will not accept responsibility for. I will continue to demonize the LGBTQ community because it scores me cheap political points with the bigoted party which I represent. I am utterly without a shred of dignity or honor but I'll still get votes because what are you gonna do, vote for a milquetoast centrist Democrat?

"Absolutely insincerely, Ted 'Don't you dare not refer to me by my preferred name' and Heidi 'My husband won't stop kissing Trump's ass since he called me ugly' Cruz."

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 57 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

As always, transphobia hurts everybody.

Everybody? Ted Cruz seems to be building a career out of it. Hatred can be a jetpack to the very top if you're shitty enough to embrace it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 6 hours ago
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago

Such a poor human being. And a leader?! Pathetic.

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Somewhere, there is a bridge in Texas that is unguarded.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The bridge is in Canada. He should go back there and guard it.

Apologies to my lovely Canadian friends. I would take a bullet for y'all, but I would burn down a lot of shit to get rid of Fled Cruz.

[–] Dvixen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

We don't want him. Surely there's an island in the middle of the ocean he can be sent.

[–] Baylahoo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 32 minutes ago

Hawaii is too good for him too. Maybe forget the island and just go with a raft.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -5 points 6 hours ago

The Advocate - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Advocate:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Wikipedia search about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.advocate.com/election/ted-cruz-unauthorized-minor-images
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support