this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
336 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2530 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Elon Musk is the most-followed user on X, and election misinformation he spreads on the platform oftentimes far-surpasses accurate information spread by government officials.

As Elon Musk continues to aggressively share conspiracy theories and misinformation about elections on X, election officials are fighting back.

But even as they are speaking out to try to counteract Musk, the owner of X since 2022, they’re being drowned out on a platform that seemingly favors falsities.

Corrections to Musk’s lies from election officials like Michigan County Clerk Barb Bynum, who regularly uses her 25,000-follower account to share accurate information about how elections work, have oftentimes received far less engagement on the platform.

“My microphone is significantly smaller than the owner of Twitter’s, but I still have to use my platform to correct mis- and disinformation, especially when it is about election administration and the integrity of our elections,” Bynum said in an interview with NBC News.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kamenlady@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He really got himself some MAGA caps in all colors, but red

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

He's a special snowflake

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

LIES.

call them what they are, ffs.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The media rarely can find it in them to use the l-word: lies. Just like they have a very hard time using the f-word: fascism.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Why is he not in jail for election interference? Oh wait, there's a billion reasons.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Turns out Elon Musk may be the most prolific liar of the century.

[–] CritFail@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

...So far, we still have the climate wars to come at some point in the next 75 years; plenty of lying opportunities for particularly motivated bastards there.

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does fact checking even work anymore? At this point it almost feels like a waste of time, and maybe even counterproductive.

Like, it doesn’t matter how hard I fact check things anymore. It doesn’t matter how many statistics I can pull out, or how simple and factual my response is.

People want to be wrong. Their mind is made up and their desire to have that opinion is unflinching. Fact checks might not even reach them in their corners of the internet. Telling someone who is choosing to be wrong that they are wrong will not do anything.

I honestly don’t know what to do instead, this seems like it is going to need something that is basically cult deprogramming.

[–] blattrules@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’d imagine it works for some people, just not the ones you’d want it to.

[–] bl_r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

Fact checking will only work on people who care about facts, and those people aren’t the problem. Though stopping doing it won’t exactly help the situation either

[–] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

I worry this fucking evil bastard is why the election could be lost.

[–] whome@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 weeks ago

Funny how he is always wearing those one color maga hats, as if he wants to show and hide his support at the same time

[–] dingdongmetacarples@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

NBC News out here pretending not to know how propaganda works

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't everyone on xitter now subjected to his bullshit whether they want to be or not? I don't go in the Nazi bar, so I don't know...