this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
194 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I will never understand how we came to a point in history where people just bent over for a compulsively lying billionaire fascist to rape to death what was left of their democracy.

It never made a goddamned bit of sense for trump to get more than 10% of votes. And yet here we are. Even if he loses (which he somehow might fucking not) he won't let it go and will be filing pointless lawsuits and whipping morons into violent frenzies for months to come.

I feel certain that depression rates have risen due to Trump. For years in therapy I talked about him and it's literally only gotten much worse since then.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Now you know why Washington warned us about political parties. The OG was right about them:

" However [political parties] may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion. "- George Washington

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He damn sure was right. Every time I've ever suggested parties should go away, someone dismisses that with a comment like "people need a platform to rally around".

The only thing trump supporters all agree on is the racism and the only thing Harris voters are 100% aligned in is avoiding trump. So I don't think the idea ever was to give people something to "rally around".

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The only thing trump supporters all agree on is the racism

Hey now... they have the misogyny, xenophobia, homophobia, and transphobia too!

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What I find even more infuriating than whatever this stuff this former douche-in-chief is doing, is the compromised Supreme Court and Fifth Circuit justices doing very similar things when they are supposed to be impartial: making up their own legal fictions to suit the justices and their financiers' own needs and citing them later on. Those are courts of a dictatorship, not a free democracy.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

He had/has judiciary support but not military support. Otherwise we’d have seen those gallows used.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Have you ever noticed that conservatives only claim cheating when they lose? When they win, the election was fair and square.

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Oh, he claimed it was still stolen in 2016. He says that he won by so much more, but the Democrats stole enough votes to make it look close.

[–] CatZoomies@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Not “fair and square”. Rather that Conservatives purport they managed to win and persevere despite the Left’s “rigging” of the election. Allows them to perpetuate their lies even further and galvanise their deluded, brain-washed base.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

"Earlier this week, he claimed York County, Pennsylvania, had “received THOUSANDS of potentially FRAUDULENT Voter Registration Forms and Mail-In Ballot Applications from a third party group.” He has also pointed to Lancaster County, which he claimed had been “caught with 2600 Fake Ballots and Forms, all written by the same person. Really bad ‘stuff.’”

During a campaign event in Allentown on Tuesday, the former president said: “They’ve already started cheating in Lancaster. They’ve cheated. We caught ’em with 2,600 votes. No, we caught them cold. 2,600 votes. Think of this, think of this. And every vote was written by the same person.”"

When you do a voter registration drive, you are legally obligated to submit all registrations, valid or not. The only entity with the legal authority to reject registrations as valid is the State Secretary of State office.

This is because, back in the day, parties would do registration drives and just shit-can any registration for opposing parties.

Now, even if some dumbass fills out a registration for “Mickey Mouse” or “Superman”, it STILL has to be submitted to the Secretary of State for rejection.

That’s not “voter fraud”.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

heyIveSeenThisOne.gif

[–] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't see him bringing up the "dead vote" this time around. Maybe that's because the four or five from last election... went to him.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 1 month ago

I believe there has already been one instance in this election of a Trump vote from a dead voter.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

Wiki: reliable - The Associated Press is a news agency. There is consensus that the Associated Press is generally reliable. Syndicated reports from the Associated Press that are published in other sources are also considered generally reliable.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/trump-cheating-fraud-lies-52832138394282b8a3355b45c0b913a9
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support