this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
377 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Texas’ top elections official informed the U.S. Department of Justice that federal election monitors are not permitted inside polling places or counting locations under Texas law. The Justice Department plans to send monitors to eight Texas counties to ensure compliance with federal voting rights laws. Despite the monitors’ presence outside polling places, Texas Democrats had previously requested their deployment to the state’s five most populous counties.

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] roy_mustang76@lemmy.dbzer0.com 148 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's a shame that Federal law supersedes state law, huh Texas?

[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 106 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

For decades, the Justice Department has dispersed election monitors across the country to observe procedures in polling sites and at places where ballots are counted. That was a power granted to the federal government under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which outlawed discriminatory voting practices and sought to equalize voting access. After the U.S. Supreme Court gutted parts of the law years ago, the agency now must get permission from state and local jurisdictions to be present or get a court order.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 124 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Lmao. Ted's going to lose so they are trying to steal it for him

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Clearly, but it's not really funny.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Federal law supercedes state law. While Texas can run the election, the feds have every right to have observers present at each and every count of the vote.

There is no wiggle room at all. They HAVE to be present. Fuck off, go cry in a corner, and if you get in the way, go to jail.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

How I wish this were true. The Supreme Court neutered parts of the voting rights act and now the feds must ask for permission from the state. No shit.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 44 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I have nothing useful to add here. I just wanted to say that Ted Cruz is a piece of shit.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Didn't be so hard on yourself, that was extremely useful.

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

Canada's top export. I mean for us, not for you guys. Fucking sucks for you guys.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably not unless the numbers swing wildly on Election Day, which is possible

But right now he has an over 3 point lead.

I just can’t imagine being someone that supports Ted Cruz, much less telling anyone about it.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

They flooded the zone with bullshit polls, so they look better. Especially GröpenFührer.

VOTE!

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 98 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, Christ. Here we go.

Just tell them their electoral votes aren't valid then. Shut this shit down now.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 89 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, I think UN monitors should be monitoring our elections at this point. The qons have no interest in actual democracy.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 73 points 2 weeks ago

How do you tell the world you are trying to steal an election. This is it.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 57 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Yo! France, we might need your help.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And the Canadians too. Wicked nice, have syrup, and are located in America's Hat.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Always preferred Canada over MAGA hats 👍

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

Federal Government:

Texas: “and I took that personally”

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, they are.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Lol that's not a battle Texas is going to win. Federal over state.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

They might as well say they are going to manipulate the count.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

So the federal institution just gets Texas employees to do it as members of the constituency.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I'm a Thirdie. This is Tin Pot El Presidente Dear Leader level of shit, not a first world nation.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

so when does abbutt come up for kickout?