this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
150 points (98.1% liked)

Games

16751 readers
701 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 71 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI will enable big game teams to move much faster, and will also put an almost unimaginable collection of new capabilities in the hands of developers in smaller game teams."

Just because lots of people tell you "I can't imagine how this will be of any help at all" doesn't mean that this is a "collection of unimaginable new capabilities".

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Someone must have used "unimaginable" and "AI" in the same slide presenting to the CEO. Understandable misunderstanding.

[–] xep@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a distinct lack of specifics in the article, and I wonder if that's because Netflix know something the rest of the game industry doesn't and aren't letting on, or if they don't.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Unless you mean they know intimately how stupid their own executives are I doubt they have any knowledge in an industry that is essentially foreign to them considering they aren't even doing very well producing their own content in the industry they do know.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How exactly will this produce novel new ideas, AI is literally incapable of doing anything it hasn’t already been trained to do.

[–] lunar17@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

It won't, but it might produce mediocre drivel at low cost, which is more profitable than paying a team of creatives to make something actually good.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This "transformational technology," as he says, will "accelerate the velocity of development and unlock truly novel game experiences that will surprise, delight, and inspire players."

Oh look, buzzword salad. Apparently though, the Netflix execs bought it. Not that I thought that Neflix has any business trying to run a game studio in the first place. But, this sounds like the same sort of bullshit which has cause many companies to burn billions of dollars on "blockchain". I suspect this "AI driven" drivel is going to end up in the same landfill as ET and NFTs.

[–] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

accelerate the velocity of development

Honestly I believe them. Because velocity is a vector, development going directly backwards at an accelerating rate is in line with what they said.

Pretty sure we all can imagine it, some hype fueled bs slop gonna be on the screen

[–] RangerJosie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'mma cancel mine. Fuck the AI shit.

[–] sirboozebum@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sail the high seas.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It won't work but that isn't the point, the point is to dehumanize game development. Failure is just a chance to consolidate and to normalize treating game development as a low quality of life "low skilled" job.