this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
308 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2503 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago

Nothing to see here, just politics as usual, the liberals are just trying to scare everyone. /s

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 4 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I'm on Methalphdenadite, don't really know how to spell that...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 48 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of Americans have to pass a drug test to get a new job. Perhaps RFK would like if we applied this reasoning to Trump's whole cabinet?

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 38 points 9 hours ago

They’re skipping the FBI checks. Safe to say there will be no drug tests.

[–] AlecSadler@sh.itjust.works 32 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

As a minority with ADHD I guess I'm fucked.

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago

Summer Camp 2025 here we come! /s

[–] ambitious_bones@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

"[...]to learn to get reparented[...]"

What does that mean?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Today@lemmy.world 24 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

They pay your mortgage and buy your kids food while you're there?

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 9 hours ago

Trade offer: you take my Prozac, I go off the deep end and take some fucks with me.

[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Technically people do owe taxes on revenue from illegal activity. You certainly could put a tax on something that's illegal, I just don't think it would bring in much revenue I'd you're still prosecuting people for that same thing you are taxing.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They tried that and it was previously struck down.

[–] GetOffMyLan@programming.dev 2 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Don't you have to state how much money you made illegally on your taxes?

[–] wagesj45@fedia.io 1 points 4 hours ago

You're supposed to in the US, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Wow, I'm so glad this dipshit who's never had to work a day in his life could give this paternal wisdom to the plebs who might need this medication to retain employment and not die destitute in the streets.

Who knew they just needed to be sent to a farm upstate so they could run free forever and ever?

[–] Boxscape@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 9 hours ago

Isn't this the plot of A Scanner Darkly?

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Zen's fascists will control you

One hundred percent natural

You will jog for the master race

And always wear the happy face

Close your eyes, can't happen here

Big bro on white horse is near

The hippies won't come back, you say

Mellow out or you will pay

Mellow out or you will pay

[–] MrGG@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 hours ago

California Über Alles!

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

"You go to a concentration camp and you go to a concentration camp! Everyone goes to a concentration camp!"

Daytime television ratings 100

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Edit: Adding this to the top because people probably aren't reading; I said this was bad.

Honestly, from what I've read in the article, if this was said by a reasonable person I'd agree with it. Optional retreats provided for free (paid for by taxes obviously) where people can go and disconnect from a potentially harmful environment? That could actually do wonders for many people, especially if therepy and counciling are provided, and ways to create plans to get away from that environment are created.

Obviously RFK Jr. is not a reasonable man though. I don't think this will be the good possibility I'm thinking of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world -5 points 8 hours ago

I wonder if commenters here went beyond the headline, or bothered to read the quote in the comments.

The actual quote is not remotely as sinister. He said that he will start these community farms (which is not a labour camp for f sake) where addicts (which is not everyone who takes meds, it’s those who do but shouldn’t, of which there are thousands) can voluntarily choose to go, which is a far cry from “I’ll shove anybody who takes antidepressants into a labour camp” as the title suggests.

There are a lot of people who take meds from dealers instead of doctors, who may have started recreationally but are now addicted to them. This is what he is lumping together with other kinds of drug addicts. It’s not even that stupid, it has been shown in studies that addiction is more effectively addressed by giving the person meaningful things to do.

Now you can have your opinion on this idea and you can be skeptical of his implementation and you really should, the guy is a nut job who shouldn’t be allowed within ten kilometres from a government office - but sending regular joes to concentration camps because they take meds is not what he said.

This title is rage bait, don’t fall for it.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›