this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
764 points (98.2% liked)

Risa

6915 readers
123 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A little short for a starship, isn't he?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 111 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sci-fi has issue with scale a lot of the time. Star Trek is no exception. Population numbers and scale of ships is often really bad.

[–] teft@startrek.website 72 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Look at Deep Space 9 and literally anytime a starship is near it. The scale goes way out of whack.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 year ago

In the DS9 title credits you can see engineers repairing the outside of one of the pylons on a spacewalk and the scale feels really wrong

[–] Stamets@startrek.website 37 points 1 year ago

Oh agreed but I think there's one major thing which is what really fucks up how your perceive it. There's nothing to compare it to.

When we see the ship it's typically just by itself flying through space where there's no comparison. Or it happens across a ship but same problem as the Enterprise so no reliable comparison. Orbiting a planet, surveying an asteroid, being yanked into a Pulsar, sitting in front of a Borg cube... All of these huge events have literally nothing reliable that humans are familiar with to compare it to. The closest you can say are the windows but the windows are such strange sizes for what we're used to that it doesn't help much.

Honestly the biggest 'events' that I can think of in Trek media that demonstrate the size of the ship are usually ones where the ship ends up on a planet. Generations crash land, Into Darkness crashland, Voyagers Blue Alert sequences, Discoverys crash land, etc. The only other one I can think of is from Picard Season 3. The Borg cube in Jupiters eye. That thing is fucking massive and the cube took up an enormous amount of space in it. That really shook the hell out of me in seeing how big that vessel was.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's hard for people living on a planet to comprehend how huge space is.

[–] Rivalarrival 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way down the road to the chemist's, but that's just peanuts to space.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

47 after inflation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stampela@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ever played Eve Online? The “Noob ship” you get free when yours goes boom is bigger than a fighter jet, the battleships (fairly big) are about 500 meters and the capital monstrosity stuff gets to a plainly overkill 17 kilometers. And in all of this? It’s hard to figure out the small ships actually need a crew and aren’t just the pilot inside

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

Have you seen container ships? They're perspective-bendingly massive. 400m is a quarter of a mile.

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (16 children)

That's like, half of a half mile.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] PlasmaDistortion@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Thanks because this image still didn’t help. Most people don’t see container ships very often.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yeah but youre also saying that the bridge of the enterprise was about the size of a container, which i am not sure is accurate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 45 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Going by the caption, it's the container ship they had a hard time visualizing. Seems weird because I've seen container ships IRL but never a starship.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 37 points 1 year ago

I used to work at a port and would see those ships out at sea. They look like they are just offshore.

Then you see the fishing boats go out and all but disappear against the massive backdrop. You realize they're many many miles out.

[–] Drunemeton@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

TV adds 20 pounds.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yeah I'm not seeing how there's several dozen people moving, working, and living in that.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A container ship's crew is 20-30 people, and that whole thing is mostly containers. I bet they'd fit.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago
[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] teft@startrek.website 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

They sleep in hallways....

[–] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] teft@startrek.website 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don’t know what the hell they’re doing with all that space

After watching discovery I assume it's all turbolift shafts.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iyaerP@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

AS much as I enjoy some aspects of Lower Decks, that was one of the most phenomenally stupid decisions that they could possibly have made.

The crew sizes for Federation starships are TINY compared to the actual size of the ships. SNW giving every crew member their own studio apartment is something that reflects the ludicrous amount of empty space that a Federation starship has availalbe to it.

If you ever look at the deck plans, there's just a crazy amount of space that's unused.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In Strange New Worlds everyone above Ensign apparently has their own studio apartment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Stamets@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You'd be stacking people on one another for sure. However the tight quarters then gives creedence to stuff like Cerritos and Voyager not having thick enough walls/doors to dampen sound. Then Enterprise-D is a whole different beast and it makes no sense for the opposite reason. It's too damn big with not enough crew. You'd have people working in their own section never meeting another soul during their whole day.

But that brings me to something else (because I have severely unmedicated ADHD and I apologize). Picard Season 3 got rapped for having the Titans bridge be really dark all the time. The lighting of the whole ship was way darker. Surprisingly I actually liked that. It felt like they were on a submarine or some small contained vessel, just then against the harshness of what was outside. That submarine quality really should be used in more shows. I know TOS had random people walking around the corridors (like the famous example of a dude who was turning an invisible valve on a wall) but I like those tight spaces.

Oh and to prove the ADHD? The Crossfield class is 900m long. Roughly. I mean she's 2/3rds nacelle but still.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Here's some more perspective. The aircraft carrier pictured apparently carries almost 2000 people.

[–] iyaerP@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

That's not even a big carrier either. American supercarriers between the flight crews, the ship crews, the marine contingent and everything else can fit up to SIX THOUSAND people.

There's no need for anyone on the Cerritos to sleep in the fucking hallways. That's like "we live on a literal submarine" level of privacy. It's beyond idiotic. The Cali class are MASSIVE. There's no need for anyone to be living in the hallways like that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Yep, the Enterprise has about the volume of an aircraft carrier, but only a fraction of the crew. By modern standards it is downright roomy.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Container ships are fucking massive. The Enterprise only held like 1000 people which is only a small portion of a basketball arena.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Honestly thought it was way bigger than this.

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Per kilogram-meter of cargo transported, container ships actually have some of the lowest emissions of any form of transportation!*

Other than electric vehicles that were charged by zero-emission sources of electricity

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember many years ago seeing a size comparison between an aircraft carrier and the TOS Enterprise. The aircraft carrier was bigger. I didn't even know how to process that because of how big the Enterprise seemed to me.

[–] Ryumast3r@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (4 children)

305m is 1000 feet. The USS ENTERPRISE was 342m or 1,123 feet.

A modern day FORD class carrier is 1092 ft or 333m.

For personnel comparison, ENTERPRISE held ~5000 people and a FORD class has between 4-5000 people.

The fact that NCC-1701 only had like 1000 people is...a big difference.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ParsnipWitch@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This made me realise you could probably fit an entire small town including all it's drama on a container ship.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] livedeified@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the Enterprise "D" (632.5m long) held 1000 people IIRC. crazy!

[–] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even crazier, the Galaxy-class has the capacity to evacuate an additional 10,000+ humanoids.

When you watch videos like this, you realize that 1,000 is not that much against the actual size of the ship. The entire crew can comfortably gather in the main shuttlebay at the same time.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lwx5uB0pyhQ

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AndyLikesCandy@reddthat.com 13 points 1 year ago

I know we only ever see a handful of rooms, that's fine, but with over 100 crew they always all have personal quarters that are probably the square footage of 3/4'ish containers.

150m in diameter is one way to think about it. But then it's also 8 containers long, or 25 containers circumference at the largest point down to no more than a few in circumference at the bridge.

You know, that seems tiny, it's like there's no volume left for the hardware that needs to be between every room and all over the hull

[–] Nurgle@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

More context, Empire State Building is 380m without the spire, 443m with spire and antenna.

load more comments
view more: next ›