this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
88 points (96.8% liked)

askchapo

22818 readers
244 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Or, more likely, a bit of both?

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 82 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

A copycat will definitely happen eventually. How many happen after that depends on what goes down.

The primary thing stopping this from happening is the feeling that people will get caught doing it. If some people start getting away with it, a lot of people start thinking they can too.

If two get away with it, it's going to become open season.

[–] Sulvor@hexbear.net 41 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Assian_Candor@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If there's no weapon and no relationship they can't do shit. The cameras definitely tip things in their favor but as long as someone covers their face and has no visible tattoos they are helpless.

[–] ClimateChangeAnxiety@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah trying to convict on just the video would be impossible. That could be literally any white man. There were several hundred white guys in NYC wearing that outfit that day.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 77 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Some of them are just rubbernecking, but it's an opportunity to get people thinking about social murder and the appropriate response

[–] BashfulBob@hexbear.net 88 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The number of "UHC killed my loved ones with their greed" stories spilling out into social media right now is an unequivocally good thing.

Can't say whether it will juice further action, but it's the precursor for radicalization.

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 44 points 2 weeks ago

Yep, gotta make sure the Capitalists can't take the reins on this one

They're trying really hard, but right now, the ball is loose on the court

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

oh god I cant wait for the libs to run "social murder" into nothingness like "karen" or "incel"

[–] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 54 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

i think private health sector CEOs are particularly hated. i doubt the reaction would have been as strong if it were Ford CEO or something.

[–] NewDark@hexbear.net 29 points 2 weeks ago

There's a few other industries you'd get a similar response, like a defense contractor or something, but in general you're right.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 53 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

it's a beautiful flash in the pan of consciousness that will fade, much like burning down the police station. Nothing will come of it, Americans are not organized and will kick and scream against any type of communist formation or party structure so it goes nowhere

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m not sure of that, there’s real talk in even .world of legitimate organizing, like a general strike. Most are afraid of everyone not being able to come together, but it’s been mentioned, which is promising imo.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmao general strikes out of nowhere is radlib wishcasting 101 and gets mentions a million times and has never occurred in history

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sure, but for an instance that blocks Hexbear and has a lot of users with .ml hate, it’s nice seeing them thinking about that. I’m hoping those radlibs change instances so they can see Hexbear.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yeah a few will be radicalized, and that is good, but if the extent of their radicalization is cheering at propaganda of the deed when it occurs it doesn't mean much

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Do you have posts you can share about this?

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

I can’t find the post it was in, but I found this one with a quick look.

I know this isn’t real solidarity and could surely be radlib roleplay, but the fact that some of them are having these feelings gives me hope (especially since I’ve been there).

I’ll keep looking.

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

I found the post I was talking about - it’s from an asklemmy post on .world asking about the ethics of the shooters actions:

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Americans went ACAB for half a year and now even police reform isnt on the minds of most of them.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 5 points 2 weeks ago

the culture war and media beat Americans into submission to the point that only like 20% were supporting the protests by the end, whereas 70% supported burning down the precinct. Democrats and corporations got their grubby hands on it and started coopting everything, and the rightwing media went into overdrive with racist propaganda and pro-cop nonsense.

Americans are fickle and stupid and easily swayed. I take little hope in this flash in the pan because they've never shown any serious longevity or adherence to an actual coordinated project, they just wash around in the tide.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 41 points 2 weeks ago

A bit of both - the fact that it became a pop culture moment is, itself, a good sign.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The fact that it's become and bandwagon thing is a good sign by itself. I've stopped caring about whether this was a hit job or not, because the shooter isn't the story anymore, everyone's reaction is the bigger story now

[–] mudpuppy@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i think calling it a hit job was straight propaganda, it doesn't look anything like one and it's good for the media's narrative

[–] ellen_musk_0x@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

But as OP pointed out, the story is now the public reaction to the assassination.

And I can't stress this enough. In previous times, the media would not have been covering the public reaction. It's actually remarkable they're giving it the attention it deserves.

**This is due to the near unanimity of it;

That we are in an era where nearly all Americans do not trust institutions (haven't been here since Watergate);

And that the establishment (media, corporations, the political class) were caught off guard by the public's reaction.**

The right doesn't analyze any of this fully. They just realize the reality of public opinion is easy to game in order to seize power. And were ahead of everyone in realizing we're already here.

The liberals weren't aware things are where they are, and seek to understand it better, but only with the goal of fixing the unfixable. Maintaining capitalism.

The left i think expected things to get here but maybe didn't realize things already were here. And now are left scrambling to organize, unprepared to take advantage of public sentiment in order to move forward with any type of equitable future.

It's not a good place to be. It could be good in the long run, but it might be worse considering where the chess pieces are.

[–] ksynwa@lemmygrad.ml 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's good that at least people even in a housebroken nation like US acknowledge how blatantly evil the health insurance industry is. The facebook post by the company mourning his death got tens of thousands of 😂 emoji reactions.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A majority still didn't agree

[–] Sulvor@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My friend, even Ben Shapiro’s viewers are telling him he’s taking the wrong stance by condemning this.

I’d say if you polled Americans under 40 you’d get majority support.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

there's definitely an age gap and i think it mirrors the generational cohort social divides.

also: i was referring to the comment about americans realizing that the health care industry was evil.

I’d say if you polled Americans under 40 you’d get majority support.

which makes them millennials and are a majority which also likes tiktok and abhors genocides; but live in a hegemony that bans tiktok; escalates beyond the gazan genocide; and voted in a presidency that will reverse civil liberty gains that they once enjoyed.

i don't think that majority support is enough anymore.

[–] MF_COOM@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago
[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 9 points 2 weeks ago

liberalism but with a hoodie

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It means it is being defanged and integrated into imperial propaganda - eventually an act of killing a murderer that caused the death of thousands - will aid to uphold the system that produces and elevates those murderers.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

Trotsky actually had a good quote about this phenomena.

A strike, even of modest size, has social consequences: strengthening of the workers’ self-confidence, growth of the trade union, and not infrequently even an improvement in productive technology. The murder of a factory owner produces effects of a police nature only, or a change of proprietors devoid of any social significance. Whether a terrorist attempt, even a ‘successful’ one throws the ruling class into confusion depends on the concrete political circumstances. In any case the confusion can only be shortlived; the capitalist state does not base itself on government ministers and cannot be eliminated with them. The classes it serves will always find new people; the mechanism remains intact and continues to function.

But the disarray introduced into the ranks of the working masses themselves by a terrorist attempt is much deeper. If it is enough to arm oneself with a pistol in order to achieve one’s goal, why the efforts of the class struggle? If a thimbleful of gunpowder and a little chunk of lead is enough to shoot the enemy through the neck, what need is there for a class organisation? If it makes sense to terrify highly placed personages with the roar of explosions, where is the need for the party? Why meetings, mass agitation and elections if one can so easily take aim at the ministerial bench from the gallery of parliament?

In our eyes, individual terror is inadmissible precisely because it belittles the role of the masses in their own consciousness, reconciles them to their powerlessness, and turns their eyes and hopes towards a great avenger and liberator who some day will come and accomplish his mission. The anarchist prophets of the ‘propaganda of the deed’ can argue all they want about the elevating and stimulating influence of terrorist acts on the masses. Theoretical considerations and political experience prove otherwise. The more ‘effective’ the terrorist acts, the greater their impact, the more they reduce the interest of the masses in self-organisation and self-education. But the smoke from the confusion clears away, the panic disappears, the successor of the murdered minister makes his appearance, life again settles into the old rut, the wheel of capitalist exploitation turns as before; only the police repression grows more savage and brazen. And as a result, in place of the kindled hopes and artificially aroused excitement comes disillusionment and apathy.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/trotsky/1911/11/tia09.htm