this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
147 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13644 readers
773 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Communism is when gay soldiers

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Following this line of logic, the soviet union, the gayest army on earth, beat fascism in the 40's.

[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 24 points 1 month ago

They allowed women in combat roles in the 1940's, literally the most woke military on earth at the time.

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

Only when gay soviet soldiers yes

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 43 points 1 month ago (3 children)

On one hand, discrimination is bad. On the other hand, less people in the military is good.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Destroying the facade of rainbow imperialism would be a major victory for the left, and republicans are doing it for us

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

True, but I'd much rather rainbow imperialism die to progressive foreign powers, rather than regressive policies from within. Oh well.

[–] SuperZutsuki@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Very much a "let them fight" thing. If it radicalizes a few more queer folk against imperialism, all the better. vivian-shrug

[–] Lemister@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Yes it ruins assimilation into the normative and oh suddenly a lot of combat experience pissed off people are looking for an explanation.

[–] TraschcanOfIdeology@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If it stopped at the military and other tools of empire, yeah. But I feel it's going to happen everywhere.

[–] TheDrink@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Fuck the military but it's absolutely a bad sign because anything they do in the military reflects what they're going to do outside of it. Changes in the US Military almost always presage changes elsewhere in US society. It went that way with integration, gay and then trans acceptance - and now they're rolling the last one back.

[–] Cysioland@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes. It'll not cripple the military, it'll just make it less diverse and prevent queer chuds from accessing the same opportunities that cishetallo chuds have

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

It'll not cripple the military

sadness You're probably right, but I can hope. Maybe this combined with other recruitment negative policies will at least reduce their strength?

But recruitment is starting to climb back up, even though branches aren't meeting their quotas, so who knows.

[–] oscardejarjayes@hexbear.net 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, Trump's made it pretty clear he's not friendly to trans people, and we make an easy target.

[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 36 points 1 month ago

Keep going please. Destroy rainbow imperialism

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] HexReplyBot@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

I found a YouTube link in your comment. Here are links to the same video on alternative frontends that protect your privacy:

[–] rando895@lemmygrad.ml 26 points 1 month ago

"...reflects a Marxist agenda"

Keep it up folks, just making marxism look cooler

[–] RNAi@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

On one hand less well armed gay people is bad. On the other, abolishing the US Navy is good

[–] invo_rt@hexbear.net 12 points 1 month ago

the military already can't meet recruitment goals

[–] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

Eh, they've already been coming for other groups. Kinda bitter at all my fellow gay and trans friends that seemed a lot less progressive over the past year.