this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2024
239 points (91.9% liked)

politics

19244 readers
2245 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 81 points 4 days ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kay_Granger

"On October 30, 2023, Granger confirmed that she would not run for re-election in 2024.[18] On March 22, 2024, she announced that she would be stepping down as chair of the House Appropriations Committee as soon as the Republican Steering Committee chose her replacement,[19] which took place on April 10.[20] Her last recorded vote was on July 24, 2024.[21] She participated in a ceremony celebrating her work on Appropriations in mid-November 2024.[22]"

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Yeah, this all seems relatively normal. Clickbait headline is definitely trying to imply that a serving Representative can just disappear into assisted living, where this woman systematically wrapped up her duties and stepped aside (if not down). Texas leaves election-year House vacancies to be filled by the election.

Why would the family not say where she is? Privacy. No one wants to advertise the medical status of family members.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 66 points 4 days ago (3 children)

The important part is that she's still officially a member of Congress. People voted for her to represent their interests. If she's no longer able to fulfill that duty she should have stepped down and let someone else do it. As it stands she and her staff are still collecting salaries paid by the American people. It's also if interest because of the general tend of geritocracy - our elected officials are really old, and it calls into question the decisions they're making and their ability to lead.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 34 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The fact that Kay Granger is unable to leave her nursing home to participate in the most important congressional vote of the year suggests she was already in visible decline when she ran for re-election in 2022. - State Republican Executive Committeeman Rolando Garcia

She is still a member of the Texas state legislature but is incapable of performing her duties. Instead of stepping down and being replaced, she stopped showing up for votes, stopped answering her phone messages, closed her offices, and checked into a memory care unit where she is unable, or unwilling, to speak to the press or apparently anyone else.

In what world is this "relatively normal"?

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

She is a member of the US House of Representatives, not Texas State Legislature.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I misread that. Thanks for pointing it out. That, if anything, makes it even worse.

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I wasn’t really a fan of term limits before but now I am because these people cannot be trusted to retire before their brains turn to mush.

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

I mean, she probably forgot. Hence being in the memory care unit.

[–] GlobalCompatriot@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She announced she was not seeking re election last year and her replacement has already been elected. She was basically a lame duck.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Lame duck representatives still have the power and duty to vote on legislation!

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Sure, but even if she had formally resigned, Texas would not have replaced her. TFA says her offices are abandoned, so likely no staff getting paid. She, herself may or may not be getting paid, but as near as I can tell, a congress person drawing 5 months of salary while being hospitalized out of DC is a pretty low level shitty-politician behavior. Besides, she'll be collecting probably 80% of that salary as pension, anyway.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 18 points 4 days ago

Seriously? She completely disappeared and stopped representing her constituents but is still being paid for that job. She didn’t wrap up her duties or step down, she just closed all the offices and left without a trace. To imply the title is clickbait is a straight-up lie, or maybe reading comprehension just isn’t your strong suit, but either way there is nothing “normal” about this aside from the fact that Republicans are just total dogshit people as a rule.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 10 points 4 days ago

Nah, she was a missing GOP congresswoman- you'll never believe where she has been found

read the articles? in this economy?

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It remains unclear why Granger’s relatives or staff declined to disclose her condition to the public.

Half of our reps are like this. I saw something or other where an American was interviewing people in the UK (I think, can't recall for certain) about our politics, and this older gentleman commented on how old our politicians are. If the guy with white hair thinks so, I feel pretty validated. Get these geriatric fucks out of here. They won't have to live with the consequences of their votes. Put in people with skin in the game.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 days ago

I just looked it up.: The median age of voting House lawmakers is 57.9 years, down from 58.9 in the 117th Congress (2021-22), 58.0 in the 116th (2019-20) and 58.4 in the 115th (2017-18). The new Senate’s median age, on the other hand, is 65.3 years, up from 64.8 in the 117th Congress, 63.6 in the 116th and 62.4 in the 115th.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

She's been subject to a massive corruption probe, so she might be pulling a Pinochet.

[–] Squorlple@lemmy.world 54 points 4 days ago (1 children)

When the government isn’t looking, let’s put all of the old fogies in charge into a home and tell them that they’re still in power.

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

She should run for Prez.

[–] coyootje@lemmy.world 21 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Man that title really read like an Onion article at first glance, crazy how that's a real news story.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

Not really. I'm thinking of Dianne Feinstein who literally ended up being escorted everywhere with a gaggle of staff to keep the press from asking her questions.

Boomers are the most selfish and entitled generation.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Better get used to it.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"I'm a Senator, call the Secret Service right now!"

"Sure you are, we'll call them right after your jello."

Amd those were the good days.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 9 points 4 days ago

This will become an urban legend and mutate with each retelling, at first becoming about there being dozens of serving congresspeople actually in care homes, then half of congress, and finally, Joe Biden having spent his lame-duck months this way.