this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
597 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

60474 readers
4156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 2 hours ago

So just out of abstract curiosity, where can one acquire these cards?

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

CEOs are all the rage these days, but hear me out here - shareholders?

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Blackcock and BJ Hornan!

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 43 points 10 hours ago

Thankfully no one cares when Forbes posts their hit list every year.

https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 138 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Here's an image of the playing cards, for anyone who just came to the comments.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 28 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Having the suit one corner and the rank in the other is going to make these a bastard to play games with. How would you hold them in your hand so's that you can see both?

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe the user was banned because of bad design?

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, at first I thought he was copying the format from Iraq but nope:

[–] Player2@lemm.ee 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If all the suits have their own color then it would be OK to play with I think. A little annoying at first but playable

[–] Andonyx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Balatro high contrast mode is a godsend.

[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 265 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Really highlights the fact that any free speech and naive western sense of freedom in these walled garden is just a button press away from being taken away and that there are no rules or standards. Whenever the owners or their friends feel even slightly displeased, annoyed or god forbid afraid the masks go off and the hammer falls.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 28 points 22 hours ago

They've been getting away with their class-war for so long any deviation from norms is alarming. Usually we just talk about black vs white, right vs left, etc.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 105 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Protocols not platforms are the future.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 117 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Sadly look at email. Technically you can host it yourself but if you're not one of the 15 or so big providers, good luck not being marked as spam before you even do anything.

The real problem is with the oligarchy controlling everything, service or protocol. This is why Threads was/is dangerous.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 10 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

And they’ve been systematically shutting down anonymous email services.

Load up Brave with a tor connection, and try to sign up for anonymous email. When they can’t track you reliably, even the “anonymous” services require a confirmation email or phone number.

[–] TotalCourage007@lemm.ee 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Man I don't want a future where we doxx ourselves to just be on a PC. Its insane that parents think real ID for gaming is a good idea. Linux might be the only way to escape any of this in the near future.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They pretend it’s to protect us from illegal activity, but it’s really to protect them from whistleblowers.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

That's not entirely true. The push for KYC came because spam started going crazy. You have no clue how bad spam is right now. And believe me, you don't know. Take the worst case scenario you can think of, and multiply that by 100, and that starts to describe the state of spam emails for the past decade.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

My spam email gets like 10 a day instead of 900+ a day, significant improvements.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is definitely a good point.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's literally the same point I was making, that your protocol can be blocked when they've decided they don't like it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Somewhat unfair judgement against emails IMO, especially cause it’s the “trust list” that’s in the control of a few, with no open manner to add more people to the trust list. The protocol isn’t at fault for failing to prevent problems; it’s the ability for corporations to gain significant market share without control, before they are then allowed to put barriers down to disallow or discourage interaction between those in and out, forcing those within to stay in, while those outside to give up on others in order to gain usability.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That was my point too, I guess I wasn't clear enough so thanks for elaborating. The protocol isn't at fault, but something being a protocol (and not just a proprietary service) isn't enough if the vast majority of the market share is being held by a few corporations.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] ToucheGoodSir@lemy.lol 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is a fair point. I've said it to numerous people talking about this subject: Americans are the most propaganda inundated people on the planet. There's some quote about about how in China people know to not believe in the gov propaganda and here it's just called the news lmao

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

I mean, North Korea exists. But yeah, Americans are extremely propagandized.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 22 hours ago

Except freedom of speech only applies to the government. You can't yell from your neighbor's front lawn either if they don't want you to.

That said, the fact police were sent is BS.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Metz@lemmy.world 109 points 1 day ago

No idea why nobody linked it yet, but you can buy them here: https://www.comradeworkwear.com/products/the-playing-cards

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago

The fucking banks refused to let him take payments.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 42 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think the cards are hilarious but they have something the other referenced sets (Iraqi, COVID) do not: silhouette targets on the back.

I am by no means defending their removal but cards but maybe don't give them a plausible excuse to remove them by implying that these cards are for shooting??

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

if they didn't want to feel threatened then they shouldn't run their businesses so provocatively.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Threats are speech that attracts repercussions.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 90 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Honestly? That very much feels like a "fuck around and find out" situation and a GREAT way to piss off rich people in the event someone else gets blue shelled.

Also: Free speech doesn't apply to social media. You can and will be banned for no reason other than someone with the power was bored.

[–] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Oh man blue shelled is perfect

Just highlights once more that we are ruled and suppressed by the rich.

[–] don@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, platforms (unless otherwise specified) are for-profit. Anything that would impede their profit stream is naturally going to be censored so that profit can continue uninterrupted.

Can’t have some idiot poor going around making richoids uncomfortable, they’d just pull their money, and that would mean less money going to the platforms.

Step 1: profit. Step 2: profit. All other steps: profit. EZPZ

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

This story goes way beyond that. The police have been harassing him as well.

It’s one thing to ban him from your own platform. It’s another to make sure no one else can choose to do business with him either.

[–] baggins@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So where can these be purchased rn? I got crypto

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The site comrade workwear opens with them on the front page, i was curious what type of workwear they had after this article.

I'm looking for a replacement for dickies and another one, their quality has been absolute ass lately. €100 work jeans that get holes in them in a matter of days, those are not work jeans anymore.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I've got some Ariat jeans that are tough.

[–] Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm looking for a replacement for dickies

Maybe check out Duluth Trading Company?

[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Aw heck, American website?

It won't allow me to open it, which has been happening more often with American sites lately.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Omgboom@lemmy.zip 21 points 1 day ago

Damn I would buy those too

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oof, the back of those cards is designed as a shooting target. So much for plausible deniability.

Probably technically falls under free speech regardless.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No different from the dozens of other targets made as targets with the face of political figures centered as the bullseye, imo. If one is fine, it's all fine.

[–] zapzap@lemmings.world 11 points 1 day ago (4 children)

And yet the card maker's website says "we do not condone violence".

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›