this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
317 points (93.2% liked)

2meirl4meirl

1113 readers
122 users here now

Memes that are too meirl for /c/meirl.

Rules:

  1. Respect the community. If you're not into self-deprecating/dark/suicidal humor then this place isn't for you. Kindly just block and move on. This is just how some of us cope.

  2. Respect one another.

  3. All titles must begin with 2meirl4meirl. This is for multiple reasons. One is just so you can be lazy with titles but another is so people who aren't into this kind of humor can avoid it.

  4. Otherwise just the general no bigotry, no dickishness, no spam, no malice, etc stuff.

Sidebar will be updated when I feel like and considering I'm Sadboi extraordinaire we'll see when that will be.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

So 50 is, superwhore?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 66 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Id imagine there's a few zeros dragging the average down.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Well there are also a few who are way above the average dragging it back up again. We need to see a distribution curve

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

This is still a bit misleading visually, because the population numbers for the bars are totalled, not distributed among the partner counts within each category. Eg. each partner count within the 2-10 partner bar has an average of ~5% of the population, which is less than the 0-partner bar, but they add up to ~45%, more than the 1-partner bar.

[–] Webster@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Red line appears to be total by specific percentage (maybe smoothed?)

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh yeah, true! Although that reveals that we're missing fine-grained data above 0 and 1, so even with smoothing it's not very detailed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

For every person who fucked 30 people, you need 6 people who never had sex to bring the average back to 5. I find 5 to be impossibly low, even as someone who's number is 5.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I’m a picky slut and only have had seven sexual partners. One of them had over 50, though.

So there’s at least 55 people with no partners we’re making up for

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I had 30 that I can actually remember when I count them out. And can only remember the names of 15 of them. So am I down right slut or is this not correct. Maybe it counting woman. Most women I met or been with numbers was in the low tens or single digit numbers. It's always men who I heard have huge numbers.

Then again some may lie. Once met a 22 year old who claimed he slept with 300 women. I didn't by that shit at all. At 22 I been with only 4. I didn't really start getting laid a lot until I discovered online dating. The amount of hookups through that app is off the charts.

[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Men and women have hooked up with the same number of men and women. Just how the math works out. 1 dude sleeps with 5 different women, means 5 women all added 1 to their number.

[–] alnitak@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Except that people can be gay.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Guess I'm a whore too, if that is true. I in the mid tens with sex partners. I thought I was on the low end. Is this a legit statistic?

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago

40 to 60 sex partners is way above average by every statistic I've ever seen

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shame shame shame! Shame you couldn't bang more.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Been a wonderful committed relationship for over 11 years going on 12. I call her my wife and I am happy. I am her first and so glad she forgives me for all the banging I did before I met her.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Mormons be skewing the data!

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago

Wait, they're shaking the data tables now, too?

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm in my slut era!

I say to myself

Sitting in my apartment alone

For the billionth day in a row

[–] Birch@sh.itjust.works 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, at least you seem to be immortal

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Feels like it, I'd love to kill myself

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 32 points 2 weeks ago

Median might be a better measure here one feels!

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Consider the fact that people have vastly different opinions on sex. Some people don't want to do it outside of commitment. Some never want to do it at all.

If your number is higher than the average, it means nothing. The average for your subgroup may be vastly different, so there is no reason to bring in a value judgment.

Tldr: I'd love to see a study of how many different partners the average wild slut has.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My straight friends think I'm a whore and my gay friends think I'm a pilgrim 🤷🏻

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 weeks ago

Some of my friends also take time off from constant fucking to wax poetic on my proclivities. It's their way of expressing envy. They're such dears.

[–] olafurp@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

That's slut logic, I'm also slut

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/new-data-here-s-how-many-sexual-partners-most-americans-have-had/ar-BB1ob50P

(This study was conducted by Dr. Jenni Skyler, PhD, LMFT, C-PST, licensed marriage and family therapist, certified sex therapist, board-certified sex researcher and a spokesperson for Adam & Eve, a sex toy company that commissioned the study)

Results suggest nearly 10% of individuals polled said they'd never had sex, while 35% said they'd been with one partner. Forty-three percent reported between two to 10 partners, and 7% had been with 11 to 25 partners. Just over 4% said they'd had intercourse with 26 to 40, 2% said they had 41 to 75, 3% reported 76 to 100 partners, and 3% reported more than 100 partners.

So, if you go by median instead of mean, its probably actually lower than 5 (probably 3 ish?), as 45% of people have had one sexual partner or less.

Displayed in another way:

0 partners : 10% of pop.

1 partner: 35% of pop.

2 - 10 partners: 43% of pop.

11 - 25 partners: 7% of pop.

26 - 40 partners: 4% of pop.

41 - 75 partners: 2% of pop.

76 - 100 partners: 3% of pop.

100+ partners: 3% of pop.

Last time I was on a dating app that had a free commenting ability and like community threads... think it was boo? Some kind of weird, basically instagram but for dating, but everyone just used it like it was instagram...

I'd run into like 23 year olds saying shit like 'this person my age was saying they've got a 200+ body count, is that normal?'

And I'd respond 'It's not impossible, but uh, chances are that they're either lying, or they're literally a sex worker, pornstar or something, that's extremely abnormal.'

I'm 35 and in the 11-25 tranche, more than average, maybe even outside of one StdDev, but its astounding how many people think that just everyone has an average of a different sexual partner for every week or two past the age of 16.

There are people that approximate that, but its pretty damn rare.

[–] BugleFingers@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I'm in the 11-25 range too, which is actually surprising to me. I've two friends who probably are the tier above that and the vast majority of the people I know are below that.

The only person I can think of that may have been even a tier above that did some work in that area, was an attractive girl, and high libido. Definitely an outlier.

TBH though I would've thought the average would've been higher

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

^jesus.

...just, how?

Edit: Also, if the sequence is adjusted to sum to 100% (≠104), the last line would be more accurate as 0.01%.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would probably have been a whore but I hit a brick wall at 26. Had like 6 relationships from 18-26 and then 0 after. Over a decade later, almost 40 now it's really feeling like that last one is really the last. "lol"

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 weeks ago

I'm right there with ya, in my own way, and I swear to all that's holy: the next one won't be the last — but it also won't be the previous one (s). And, that's enough for me to make damn sure I work on me in the meantime. 🤘🏼

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 21 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

OK, so where do I apply for these 5 sexual partners?

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

With a username like that, OP’s in luck. Lilith likes to ride on top.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Average seems like a weird statistic to use here. I'd want to at least also know the median.

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

One of the things I learned from "How to Lie with Statistics," is when an article or ad says "average" thet could mean the mean, median, or mode depending on which fits the desired narrative best. The reader usually assumes the writer is referring to the mean which helps in establishing these misleading narratives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I wonder if that statistic is still true since the proliferation of "dating" apps. You used to have to put in a considerable amount of effort for a one-night-stand. I was already married before dating apps hit the scene, but my understanding is there are millions of people out there just messaging "wanna fuck?" to each other and then hooking up for the night. Society's attitude towards ~~being a ho~~ casual sex is quite different now too. So, I question the accuracy of their average statistic in modern times.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 7 points 2 weeks ago

People have less sex overall. I dont think that dating apps necessarily increased the numbers.

[–] lath@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

I'd say it also has to do with the abysmally low level of sex education. The ignorant are less wary about the dangers of STDs and more adventurous regarding their choice of partners.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

I got laid much more often when I was a desperate loser.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Im too Asexual to get this :3

[–] Dragonborn3810@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Woo ace power

[–] UnsavoryMollusk@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Today I learned that I am far from being a whore 😢

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

Today i learned I'm a virgin

load more comments
view more: next ›