this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
358 points (98.4% liked)

News

24550 readers
6267 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk’s staffers entered NOAA and the Department of Commerce without clearance, raising concerns over budget cuts and downsizing.

Project 2025, a conservative plan linked to former Trump officials, calls for dismantling NOAA, citing its climate research as harmful to U.S. prosperity.

Critics warn such cuts could impact weather forecasting, ocean conservation, and fisheries.

NOAA declined to comment, while experts fear an aggressive strategy to weaken the agency before legal challenges can halt changes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Pretty good supervillain arc through, right? Just in real life.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

question.

instead of protesting at the capitals of our states -- why don't we protest at the HQs of these departments to stop these assholes from getting inside?

lots of benefits

  • heightened on-site security
  • lots of witnesses
  • impenetrable wall of pissed off Americans
  • angry mob to deport illegal South Africans

I mean...has nobody thought of this yet?

it would at least slow the fucker down, and it's not like we don't know what these shitheels look like.

just 24 hour, round-the-clock, protests to keep the jackals at bay.

[–] meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works 15 points 13 hours ago

Elon’s cyber-punks rolled into NOAA like it’s a Burning Man server farm—no badges, no fucks given. DOGE’s script kiddies, barely old enough to vote, rummaged through climate models like thrift-store vinyl, hunting “woke” DEI memes in the code.

Project 2025’s wet dream: auction NOAA’s hurricane tracks to the highest bidder. 12,000 jobs? Slash ‘em. 50-year datasets? Oops, legacy system. Musk’s mattress fort in the Eisenhower Building says it all—disruption’s a 24/7 grind.

Meanwhile, Florida retirees’ storm alerts get paywalled. But sure, privatize tornado warnings. What’s next, a Tesla-branded rain dance? The West Coast elite smirk; Middle America’s weather app glitches.

Efficiency, my ass—this is a digital coup.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 10 points 13 hours ago

Imagine working for NOAA tracking weather patterns across the ocean or some crazy shit and a 23 old fucking virgin loser comes up to you and tells you you're about to lose your job. Lol

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago

God :')

All this Idiocracy stuff must be an elaborate joke by the American people on the rest of the world right?

[–] flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 13 hours ago

This is it. This is the one I most dreaded. I knew they were coming for NOAA and I knew they were going to destroy it and here we are, forced to watch it happen.

Fuck. The department I admired most.

[–] MyDogLovesMe@sh.itjust.works 23 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Id love to see a Cat 5 wipe out his Maralago with no warning, while NOAA just shrugs.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago

Naw, he will just use his magic Sharpie and redirect it to Mexico.

[–] Tedesche@lemmy.world 9 points 14 hours ago

Trump would just allocate all of FEMA’s funds to rebuild it out of solid gold while leaving everyone else affected by the hurricane in the dirt.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd like to remind everyone that NOAA is under the Department of Commerce because, as it turns out, understanding weather patterns, being able to accurately forecast weather changes, is kind of important to businesses.

[–] evilcultist@sh.itjust.works 27 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I think there have been businesses trying to get it shut down for years because they want to sell the data rather than giving it out for free. I forget which ones, but I’d swear I read about this years ago.

Just did a quick search with no luck, but apparently it’s part of Project 2025 to commercialize it or get rid of it.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 18 hours ago

AccuWeather.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yes, but they claim climate change is real, so they must be abolished! /s

[–] Bigfish@lemmynsfw.com 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Without clearance? Arrest them. The fuck.

[–] IzzyScissor@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Seriously. No clearance should mean no entrance. If they try to use force, the use of force to prevent their entry is both warranted and necessary.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 7 points 14 hours ago

Like for real, can I just walk in and declare myself head of the department?

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 96 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The United States is under attack.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Inevitable. At some point the United States would run out of countries and have to invade the United States.

[–] sepi@piefed.social 5 points 15 hours ago

There's oil in the USA

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 114 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Rejoice people! We will no longer be terrorized by weather alerts reporting possibly devastating weather events! Trump's Redhats led by his South African immigrant billionaire henchman will make sure that Trump's Sharpy of Truth will protect us!

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Nah, this isn't even about data control. This is about selling off the data, the forecasting infrastructure, the hardware, models, and most important, SATELLITE NETWORK that allow accurate forecasting. Commercial launches of scientific instruments are very very expensive with very little immediate ROI. It's much cheaper to simply buy an existing entity out that HAS THAT and then piggyback their data - which is effectively what this is. AccuWeather has been wanting this for almost 20 years.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, if a hurricane is coming, you can always nuke it, right?

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

It's easier to just use a Sharpie to make the hurricane love.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I remember when Musk bought Twitter and then immediately started trying to save money by literally just turning off services to see what breaks.

That actually wouldn't have been the stupidest idea if he had done it in a test environment rather than production, or even if Twitter was a small website that didn't mind downtime. But he did it in production on a huge site that people relied on being up, so it actually was the stupidest idea.

And now he's bringing the same stupidest energy to government. No investigation. No calculation. Just a toddler who has been put in front of a lot of switches.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People relied on Twitter? That doesn't sound right.

[–] otter@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At the time it was used by a lot of entities (including several government agencies in various countries) for alerting.

[–] SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

A lot of companies still use it for customer relations, sadly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Unless twitter had a test system doing millions of varying actions a second, I'm not sure a test environment would find those problems, or at least not quickly. Sometimes those services get added to help spread loads that you might not encounter otherwise.

Tbh I'm not sure what level of automated testing these sites have, but I also wouldn't be surprised if the services are tested in isolation at scale, but not against each other at scale, and that there's some general understanding that the link between them at scale is okay if both individually are okay?

Still absolutely terrible to do that to a live environment.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 71 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They have already stated their intention of replacing the National Weather Service with the very ironically named, and privately-owned, AccuWeather, so I guess this is the start of that.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 51 points 1 day ago (2 children)

...doesn't AccuWeather (like most weather services) pull their data from NWS?

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For now, yes. Under the plan outlined in Project 2025, AccuWeather gets control of all of the NWS weather stations.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Jesus.

My empathy is all tied up with the marginalized groups, minorities, federal workers, and others already negatively affected by this administration. If some yokels in flyover states who voted for him get taken out by a tornado because they had to watch a 30 second ad before the weather alert would show up, I got nothing for them.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Unfortunately, plenty of people who live in flyover states also tried to stop these people from getting into office. There are fewer of them, but still millions.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 16 points 1 day ago

I know, I'm one of them. Ugh.

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

um. so. do they know accuweather relies on the government to do their forecasts. almost all weather forecasts originate with the us or european agencies and then have some local radar and sensors to get local temps, windspeeds, and precipitate.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yep, but they plan to give AccuWeather all the NWS monitoring stations.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

And then AccuWeather leases out the data to all those foreign and domestic weather agencies and makes heaps of cash saying "well if you want accurate forecasting data that's gonna be $200k/yr."

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The sattelites because I was under the impression most monitoring stations were owned locally but everyone shares with the government and in return gets access to the information?

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

"What's yours is mine and what's mine is mine." I expect Musk just assumes he owns all of those and if he ever finds out he doesn't then he will then assume ownership of it. And then probably try to sell you access to your own weather station.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Maybe this is the inevitable endgame of a society that tries to harness greed the way capitalism does. Something can be working completely sustainably and for the general good, like NOAA does, and they still try to take parts of it away just so they can extract profits by selling to you what used to be free.

Its why they hate work from home. Covid came along and necessitated that workers en masse be given a benefit, and capitalists werent able to extract any concessions in return because it was an emergency. So, they claw it back, but you might be able to get a special exception if you play ball.

[–] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 1 points 8 hours ago

You're right, except it's the only game, not the endgame. Since neoliberalism became consensus, public assets have been sold off and paid for again by the public, but privately. We bought the roads, railways, waterways, weather stations etc with our taxes, they were sold, and we didn't see a penny of the profits, and then we have to buy them again with our wages. The endgame is where there's nothing left to sell off, no more exponential growth to be had, that's when it all collapses. Greed, it seems, allows you to see past the fact that this collapse is inevitable.

[–] Gigliorananomicom@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just chop off his head wtf

[–] SilverCode@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I get the impression that if you chopped off his head, he would just grow 2 back. Then we would have twice as much bullshit excreting from his blowhole

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

Only one way to find out.

[–] eagleeyedtiger@lemmy.nz 1 points 14 hours ago

Well then the only option is to throw him into an active volcano

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No more hurricane forecasts to make America safe again !

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 3 points 20 hours ago

Sorry. Hurricane warnings and forecasts are only for our members with the diamond package. Would you like to upgrade now for $49.99, so you know when you should evacuate?

[–] CellarRat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well they did it to themselves, if they just forecasted only sunny days then they could stay! But no they had to keep bringing in illegal Mexican hurricanes!

spoiler/s cause at this point someone might actually believe this

[–] twistypencil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago