this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
196 points (93.0% liked)

Greentext

4410 readers
1282 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 93 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It has been a while, but I'm pretty sure the bladed weapons are needed because the shields specifically block objects with high kinetic energy. I also recall one of the houses on arakis getting bombed, but only after they were able to turn off the protective barrier. I might be mixing up Sci fi books, though.

[–] balthazarsnakewizard@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You’re not - it’s pretty explicitly the point. The technological arms race has gotten so advanced that everyone has devolved into fighting with knives.

[–] filcuk@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 year ago

And even then, the training focuses on slow, deliberate moves, as even a fast knife can be deflected.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The shields don't just protect against kinetic weapons, they also tend to cause energy weapons to blow up in a thermonuclear explosions iirc

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Specifically it causes the explosion at both ends, so firing a laser at something you aren't 100% absolutely positively sure is unshielded is suicidal.

[–] Waltzy@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sounds like a drone dropping an energy weapon on a shield users head would do the trick then.

[–] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

iirc computing is pretty gimped in Dune as well because of previous issues with AI, humanity limited development on that front and focused on developing human capabilities instead, which is where spice came into play…it like super charged your cognition in order to navigating ships through space or something like that. Someone familiar with books please correct that I’m sure it’s not perfect.

[–] Heavybell@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

That's right. There was a war called the Butlerian Jihad in which humanity wiped out anything close to AI. Since then it has been high-treason-level illegal to "make a machine in the image of the human mind".

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

That's why they have "Mentats".

Also, the book was written in the 1960's. At the time, you still communicated with a computer using a teletype because nobody had thought to put words on a screen yet. You can also see this in the original Star Trek - they never show a screen with text on it.

[–] UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

There are cultural implications. For the same reason that thermonuclear warheads are stockpiled but not used these days, they avoid using lazguns because you simultaneously blow up more than you would need and turn everyone against you. There are laws in the empire that prevent a military power from intentionally triggering one of these reactions for obvious reasons.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hillock@feddit.de 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You are correct. But the movies did indeed make a poor introduction to the shield technology. I think it was just a short mention when Gurney is training Paul and is easily missed. They even have to train for a specific fencing style that involves slow movements as a fast swung blade can still be stopped by the shield. And I don't remember them talking about the interaction between lasers and shields at all, which creates a huge explosion.

My bigger issue with the movies was the typical hollywood charge. No tactics or strategy involved at all. Just screaming and running.

[–] Leshoyadut@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The shield-based fighting style was also a small note that was missed in the duel between Paul and Jamis in the movie. Paul was missing what they thought were clear cuts and as a result they believed he was cruelly toying with Jamis, but it was because he was slowing his blade at the very last moment due to shield training.

Also a slightly weird moment for me as a book fan was when the thopter Duncan escaped in clearly showed that it had shields with a rock crashing off of it, but then he was being chased by lasguns immediately after.

[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Also a slightly weird moment for me as a book fan was when the thopter Duncan escaped in clearly showed that it had shields with a rock crashing off of it, but then he was being chased by lasguns immediately after.

Glad to know I wasn't the only one who thought that was a bit off-putting. Same where the Sardaukar try to use a laser to get to Paul, nobility is almost guaranteed to wear a personal shield, so that felt like a very bad idea. Although you could argue that Sardaukar are fanatic enough to not care about getting wiped from existence in a nuclear explosion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 year ago

My biggest gripe with the movie currently is that when a Crysknife is drawn it must draw blood before being sheathed again. If you don't use it on someone you must cut yourself. This is explained to the reader in the book, but in the movie it includes the scene where it would be explained but isn't mentioned. It's not a huge deal. They can just ignore it. However, at the end of the movie the Fremen have their knives drawn and it focuses on them cutting their hands to sheath them. I'm sure people who didn't read the books before seeing the movie would think it's really weird, especially for a culture so obsessed with water (although I don't recall if they've discussed recovering water from blood yet).

[–] Zirconium@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes it is because of shields. Laser fire on shields makes a nuclear explosion and I think most fast projectiles are reflected.

[–] YoFrodo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also don't personal shields attract the worm?

[–] undeffeined@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Yes, correct

[–] WetBeardHairs@lemmy.ml 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Sucks for him - I literally can't stop jerking myself over the movie. It was soo gooood. Oh. Time to clean up again.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Put your sand worm back where it lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

easily the best movie in recent years by far

imma go now. searching sardaukar chant techno remixes as romantic background music

[–] TIN@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do those actually exist? Please tell me those exist.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Making sardukar groans the whole time

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Now ask why fighters in Star Wars bank and turn like WW2 fighter planes flying in atmosphere...

Hint: Narrative ~~convenance~~ convenience .

[–] Cantankerousnuts@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's where narrators convene to discuss the dumb shit their protagonists did instead of heed the call.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randomsnark@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Narrative convents. The explanation is nun of your business.

[–] Shard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Narrative Covenant, when you decide to do a dune/halo crossover.

[–] mnoram@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Narrative conveyance. It's the movie's means of transportation.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I should really pay closer attention to auto correct.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)
[–] Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

They probably meant 720.

[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Doing a 360 has been a meme on 4chan for years

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The movie theater I go to has the exit at the front of the seats, so this makes sense. He twirled around until his Wonder Woman costume appeared and stormed out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FierroGamer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Need to look behind before walking backwards, just to make sure you're not going to bump into someone else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] echodot@feddit.uk 41 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The movie had its problems and I've never read the books but even I know the answer is because the shields don't stop slow moving objects otherwise you wouldn't be able to pick up a cup. It's even explained in the film, admittedly very briefly.

But then again that's also how personal shields work in Stargate

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also a laser hitting a shield causes a massive explosion, which could be at the shield or laser gun. Bullets get stopped and a laser would likely kill either user if many kilometers away, or both of closer.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No could be, it's at the shield and source.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have they considered that poison gas also moves slowly?

And napalm?

They sure as hell don't mind war crimes.

[–] overjustic@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago

That's a plot point in the series, yes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 year ago

Laze guns interact with the sheilds causing basically the destructive power of Tsar Bomba+, but knives/swords (when used properly, as Gurney Halleck taught Paul to do) pierce the sheilds. Read the book nerd.

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had a coworker who hated warhammer40k because they had lasertanks but then lost the tech for lasertanks and that was enough for it to make the future part of it not work for them.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It is kind of ridiculous that the Imperium turns entire goddamn planets into factories but still plays the "lost technology" card for things they have working examples of. I know they're not a shining example of inquiry and skepticism in general, but you'd fucking figure the blow-shit-up department gets carte blanch. You have genius-level superhumans who are three centuries old and those guys are your soldiers. What the fuck is stopping the laser pewpew R&D effort?

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

What the fuck is stopping the laser pewpew R&D effort?

Dogma. The R&D is literally heresy that gets you BLAMmed in the head

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

, but you’d fucking figure the blow-shit-up department gets carte blanch.

iirc the techpriests kinda do get a blank check on doing whatever they want, the inquisition is even sketchy on giving them 'oversight'

[–] FunkyMonk@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah their final arguement is it's too much sci-fantasy at it's core for them and that is pretty accurate, everything serves the lore instead of the science being... anything reality based at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aganim@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Just wait until he hears about Battletech's LosTech..

[–] dingleberry@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

Rule of the cool bud.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

ITT someone didn't read the books

load more comments
view more: next ›