this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2025
846 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

61963 readers
3767 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At the current rate of horrible fiery deaths, FuelArc projects the Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto's 0.85. (In absolute terms, FuelArc found, 27 Pinto drivers died in fires, while five Cybertruck drivers have suffered the same fate, at least so far.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mombutt_long_and_low@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I was thinking “What’s that red stu—oh…” Yikes.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Melted plastic... right? Yup imma say it's melted platic

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 72 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing that some people at the National Transportation Safety Board are about to get fired by Elon Musk.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Safety belts are a waste of precious money!

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 1 points 23 minutes ago

Won't someone think of the shareholders!

[–] thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

But at least its bulletproof!

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago
[–] xapr@lemmy.sdf.org 68 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Cybertruck will have 14.52 fatalities per 100,000 units — far eclipsing the Pinto’s 0.85.

Holy shit, that means the Cybertruck fatality rate is around 17 times higher than the Pinto's!

[–] Greee1911@lemmy.world 17 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

If you read the article is was specifically died by fire. Not any other cause of death.

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 33 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Right but the specific issue with the Pinto was that it would explode into flames on a rear impact, so this is the appropriate metric.

Like deaths from other accidents would skew the numbers anyway because 70s cars were death traps compared to today, but even in that context, the Pinto's explosions were alarming.

Beating it on that isolated metric is a very special kind of achievement.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Top of the line in utility sports.

Unexplained fires are a matter for the courts.

[–] Krompus@lemmy.world 2 points 42 minutes ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 6 points 14 hours ago
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 186 points 19 hours ago (8 children)

I love Elon Bad posts, but I think it's worthwhile to examine why Elon bad in this case.

Like many reactionaries, Elon's business philosophy is pure tech-bro-libertarianism. And like all libertarians, he's stuck in the neoliberal mindset of less regulation (don't scrutinize) and more efficiency (let me be cheap), in order to create the safe space that industrialists need to ~~extract~~, er create.

He's literally said things like (paraphrasing)

When I see a specification for three bolts I ask: why can't we do it with two?

His transparent reasoning is that if he's allowed to cut corners, he'll save money today and consequences can be dealt with when they arise.

He's following the software model of release a minimally viable product and patch it later. Only instead of user frustration at being beta testers, you fucking die maybe.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 78 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (8 children)

Him and his libertarian friends fuck up left and right. Crashing startups and just getting more money for another. Constant recalls. Blowing up rockets until it works.

Yet they hold the government to a standard of being perfect and high performing with no room for failure. NASA can’t be blowing up rockets. As soon as they do the world comes down on them.

And Trump is the biggest fuckup of all these guys.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 45 points 17 hours ago

I think it's also worth noting that Elon Musk is a scammer. Every other word out of his mouth is likely a lie. He's been claiming to already have technologies available for his Tesla cars, his SpaceX rockets, etc, all ready to go and.. it never happened. Tesla full self driving? The Tesla taxis? SpaceX on Mars? The Tesla laughably stupid robots? Even those were faked.

Claims after claims for decades and literally no results

The guy is a full on bait and switch yet everyone seems to lap up everything this scammer says.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 56 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

You can't use "literally" and "paraphrasing" like that.

[–] flyingjake@lemmy.one 22 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Thank you, my pedantic friend. (I say this because I'm often the one making the comment and getting the eyerolls)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 5 points 14 hours ago

He is like a child who is still rebelling against his parents who made him go to bed early too many times.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

No shit, it's literally just a big bullet. Or a wrecking ball on wheels.

[–] Jericho_Kane@lemmy.org 2 points 5 hours ago

The only thing that makes the cyberfuck safe is it's pricetag and it's virgin protector looks

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 205 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (4 children)

...and unlike the Pinto, because we are so deep into fucked-reality-ville, it won't get recalled.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 126 points 20 hours ago (8 children)

Ford's reasoning was that it was cheaper to pay out for the injuries and deaths than to change the car. Cybertruck has a much better plot armor, a fanbase that refuses to believe it's crap.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

I think that fanbase is staying to wane. But who knows, maybe the gas loving Maga rednecks will start buying...who am I kidding, most of them can't afford the ridiculous price tag.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 40 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Not only that, it's not even a proper truck. They could have come up with a standard truck design and used tech and EV to create a new niche that was usable. But no one can tell Elon no, so his 5-year-old self's vision had to be made because it's different. Sometimes different doesn't mean better.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

the maga crowd has diesel truck attached to their very masculinity, thats never happening.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago (13 children)

Nah. The Ford Pinto laid the groundwork for the NHTSA's regulatory control of forced recalls. The only way this thing doesn't get recalled for being dangerous is if Musk's D. o. g. e manages to undercut or defund the NHTSA.

Additionally, other countries with better regulatory bodies won't even allow it to be sold or will require mandatory recall of these vehicles which means the end of the cyber truck. They can't even sell them because people don't want them.

The other thing is that insurance companies can absolutely refuse to insure them and if I'm honest, they may be the main reason that the NHTSA doesn't back down from regulating them (insurance companies are a powerful lobby, and they absolutely can countermand the automotive lobby in some cases).

My point is, it's more complicated than just "Musk is a government official now, and historically dangerous cars weren't recalled".

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JesusTheCarpenter@feddit.uk 35 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Is it me or are there guts in this picture?

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Hard to tell. The picture was widely used in the media, and they're usually quite careful about that kind of thing. There's something reddish in it, but it could be material from the truck or its contents. One of the photos the police released of his guns had some red foamy material in it, another photo had some stringy red material (plastic?) lying in the road, and there were various red items in the bed too. I'll mark it NSFW just in case.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 14 hours ago

The driver was inside the vehicle at the time, so I'm sure some of that is his remains. But a lot is probably burned seat material and such. It's hard to say for sure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago

But it is so financially efficient! It isn't wasting money on safety.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Really took the wind out of my satirical comment that Musk wanted to bring back the Pinto.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 75 points 20 hours ago (11 children)

The Pinto got well known for a couple of reasons.

One, the classic "exploding in a rear end collision." The design flaw here was that in certain rear collisions, the fuel tank would be pushed into the rear differential. Not only could this rupture the fuel tank, it could also produce a spark. Boom. Lots of cars had this same design in the 70s, with the fuel tank low in the rear, right behind the rear differential.

Two, the infamous Pinto Memo, which did a cost benefit analysis that determined it would be cheaper for Ford to not fix the problem, and just settle whatever cases came up. This very clearly inspired the Fight Club recall formula scene. Take note that the car used in that scene is a Lincoln Town Car, produced by Ford Motor Company.

The kicker for the Pinto recall? What they did to fix it:

  • Two sheets of 1/8" plastic, each about 18" square
  • Some long zip ties
  • Layer the two sheets over the rear diff, zip tie them to the axle

That's it. My dad pointed this out to me in his shop some time in the late 80s or early 90s. He had a Pinto in for an oil change or something, "Hey, let me show you this." It was such a hacky "repair."

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 52 points 20 hours ago (4 children)

And some people wonder why the cybertruck is barely sold outside the US.

Everything I hear about this thing is bad.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 41 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It's barely sold in the US as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 31 points 20 hours ago

keep in mind that while the cybertruck might seem like a bad vehicle, it also is a bad vehicle

[–] bus_factor@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

It's barely sold outside the US because other places (like the EU) also care about the safety of people outside the vehicle. That's why European and Asian cars (except the models explicitly for the US market like the Tacoma) are designed for pedestrians to be deflected, while US cars are a moving brick wall which will squish them like a bug.

Also, I suspect you'd need commercial plates and a special license to drive it most other places, due to the weight.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] socialmedia@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It seems obvious in hindsight. Sheet metal doors will crumple in a way that can't be opened, trapping occupants. The fire doesn't need to start in the relatively safe and armored battery system. It could be pinched wiring causing a short that ignites plastic interiors, or a fire from another vehicle spreading to the cybertruck.

I'm sure someone mentioned all this to them during design.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 1 hour ago

Plus there's the electronic opening mechanisms that fail in the event of a fire. This is on most Teslas iirc. Even if the doors are intact, you're stuck.

There's ways to open them, but good luck with this shit when you're concussed from an accident, and sat in a burning vehicle.

https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/modely/en_us/GUID-AAD769C7-88A3-4695-987E-0E00025F64E0.html

load more comments
view more: next ›