Of course. For Trump, presidency goes to the highest bidder. Musk just outbid Vance, that's all.
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
I actually don't think Trump will endorse Musk either but I could be wrong .
That's because Trump doesn't view himself leaving office in 2028. He's president for life now.
Welp, you heard the news JD. There's only one way for you to become president...so get to work. I mean as long as you say its an official act you can do the deed yourself and aparently its totally legal.
Things have changed a lot since '14.
Like "on the one hand it's a hassle having your husband be president"
"... Buton the other hand... I want my daughters to have rights..."
So far his only smart words as a president.
Perhaps because he doesn't seem to think there will be a need for a 2028 presidential race. Did he not say "you won't need to vote anymore" to his supporters after the 2024 election?
yes. yes he did. that either means he's establishing himself as dicktator for life, or he's gonna fuck up the country so much there won't be a government to elect in 2028. his actions thus far, it's hard to tell which way he's aiming that malformed 'shroom of his.
Trump views Trump as his successor.
Trump cannot fathom a world where he's not the center. So to him, the 2028 election doesn't exist. It doesn't dawn on him that the republican party will NEVER stand in the way of the 2 term limit, for one important reason. If they ever lose, they may never win again. Imagine if Obama had been allowed to run for a 3rd term. We'd be on his 6th term right now.
So republicans don't want to risk that.
It's like being 4th and 9. You punt. Unless you're close enough for a field goal. But you don't run a play and risk losing everything.
republicans have thus far been willing to risk literally the entire constitution/democratic process, but term limits for president would be the line they don't cross?
Because its the one that has consequences.
If they kill democracy, or kill the constitution, that just means THEY'RE in charge.
But if they go against term limits, there is no more inevitable back and forth. There could be a time where the democrats gain power, and without term limits, never give it up.
Whereas this way, they continue to make slow progress thats never interupted. They don't want to risk that.
If the SC allows for a 3rd term as an option, it'll be Trump v Obama 2028.
To quote (Barack) Obama when he was asked in '14 or '15 about hypothetically running for reelection again if it somehow became legal, "Michelle would kill [him]"
She's done with the whole political pageantry bullshit, if her absences from hollow political theatre events like the Trump inauguration are any indication.
Good for her, I say.
Unfortunately, the legislative policy that's being floated in the House is that a president can seek a third term only if their first two terms were non-consecutive. (Source)
Ah yes. The "I'm too scared to run against Obama" clause
He knows Obama has bigger crowd sizes.
No chance of passing thankfully.
Absolutely! Thankfully. Just tipping their hand with regards to the ridiculous bullshit they'll try use to prevent a Trump vs Obama situation.
that's gotta sting, eh, vd?
Heh. VD.
Alternatively: heterosectional
Way too early to anoint a successor.
He's the oldest president in our history and eats McDonald's frequently...