this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
49 points (98.0% liked)

Europe

2469 readers
1681 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Saleh@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The social media news cycle is driven by influencers and alternative media, rather than traditional news outlets. This makes it harder for users to verify facts, while also diminishing their faith in mainstream journalism. It also, as highlighted by the report, decreases their trust in political institutions: 21% of the young people surveyed expressed scepticism toward the EU, and 15% admitted they skipped the 2024 EU vote due to a lack of information.

I think here cause and effect are not as simple as presented in the article. "Traditional news outlets" are often deliberately filtering and ignoring certain topics, peddling institutional disinformation and representing the interests of their billionaire owners and increasingly consolidating into the control of less and larger companies. These aren't new issues. There is an extensive analysis for the US from Herman and Chomsky, called Manufacturing Consent - The political economy of the mass media. The book is from 1988 yet its analysis still holds true today. Chapters like "worthy and unworthy victims" that were analyzed in the context of Vietnam and US backed Terrorists in Central America can be copied word by word onto todays conflicts, like Israel/Palestine.

On top of these systemic issues with "traditional" media there came a significant decline in quality with more clickbait, just pure copies of reuters/AP/DPA and fabricated outrage based on social media posts, since news moved online more and more.

Finally the quality of "traditional" media is often bad. If you read a bad article in your physical newspaper, you might recognize it in topics you are familiar with. Now you see a link and people comment how this or that aspect is bad/false and provide further reading.

Meanwhile there is some "alternative" media that provide extensive references, show things that are deliberately omitted by "traditional" media like videos of police violence, videos of people being abused, bombed, murdered by allied countries or "our own" soldiers, corruption in institutions...

These are all reasons, why people turn away from "traditional" media. Yes Social media and the algorithms have significant problems with disinformation. However they also exposed, how bad "traditional" media is and how it often is equally riddled with disinformation and propaganda.

[โ€“] SARGE@startrek.website 7 points 2 days ago

My first though in reading the title was "well when your alternatives are shit like fox or CNN, you might as well just get it from social media."

There's about the same amount of integrity from it, and it's way easier to think "man, this one guy I'm watching might not know what he's talking about" than it is to think "this whole team of people are wrong" but then you have to take into account the parasocial relationship many viewers have with their content providers. It's easier to trust "Paul" because he's wearing the same clothes I am, speaking to me the way I talk, giving me things I like to hear.

Content creators (I stubbornly refuse to call them 'influencers') will push brands and sponsors all day every day, but news outlets will fabricate your entire reality at the behest of whatever rich fuck is in charge. News outlets happily run state propaganda, knowing they are lies.

anecdoteI was still a child during Iraqi freedumb and even then I knew something was fucky because friends in other countries were saying our politicians were lying to us to go to war, but my parents and teachers all believed the media coverage of wmds

Conclusion: all media sucks. Sensory deprivation chambers are the future of mankind if we are to survive. And I'm only partially joking, I think.

[โ€“] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 15 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Hm, does Lemmy count as "social media"? Most of the news posts are links to news sites ...

[โ€“] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 13 points 2 days ago

Definatelly social media, isn't it on Facebook similar that people post links to news articles and then comment on them?

The only difference seemt to me to be the algorithm.

[โ€“] vxx@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Social Media can be your source for news while being an aggregator for news sources.

They shpuldve picked a different word... or it's exactly the right one to maximise engagement.

[โ€“] devfuuu@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Of course, I'm not going to get news anywhere else.

[โ€“] jeena@piefed.jeena.net 6 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Where do the old people get their news from? I'm 46 and getting it mostly from Lemmy.

[โ€“] 9point6@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Probably don't fall into old yet, but me in the UK, in my mid-30s:

  • Lemmy
  • BBC News
  • The Guardian
  • Ground News
  • YouTube (though generally to a much lesser extent than the others)
[โ€“] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

TV, newspapers and/or Facebook, I'd assume.

[โ€“] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

Hi, I'm old. Newspapers.

[โ€“] bigFab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

No shit. I would never think of that despite seeing everybody with the face glued to the phone all day.

[โ€“] Foni@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Leaving this in foreign hands is a clear mistake. Federated networks, with cores in different countries, could be an acceptable solution, but anything else cannot be accepted.