189
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Zevlen@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 55 points 8 months ago

Every time

Every single time

Every time, when the media posts pictures and names of murderers, they help create more copy cats.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 75 points 8 months ago

I feel like this was an exception to the rule, since he was still at large for a while and it was imperative to the public safety that people knew who he was and what he looked like.

That said, yes, the media does need to pull back on publishing details about the killers in these situations.

[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 11 points 8 months ago

At the time, maybe, but he's dead, no reason to keep parading the name and picture around anymore.

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago
[-] Zevlen@slrpnk.net 13 points 8 months ago

🤔 uhh ... Should I remove his name from the title of the post?

[-] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

That's ok, I read it as Report Card anyway

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

What they need to do is start showing the bodies. Graphic photos. Everywhere we look we should see them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 50 points 8 months ago

Quit naming them in the titles! Just let their legacy evaporate.

[-] logicbomb@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

There's definitely a lot of truth to what you're saying, but it seems like this overall effort is an attempt to shift attention away from gun control and focus on individual culpability.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

And nothing of value was lost.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 38 points 8 months ago

I mean, sure would have been nice to have a living suspect for the criminologists or psychologists.

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

I bet we can figure out his motives and mental state through good ol' fashioned detective work. I'll take the first step for them, and tell them to look at his social media history. Freud would shit himself if he were alive today and could scroll a facebook feed.

[-] JustZ@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

He was an America-First conservative, what else do you need to know?

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 months ago

We’ve learnt all we can from these psychopaths, to be honest.

I’m just angry he got off so easy. He should have had to face what he did.

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 25 points 8 months ago

I disagree. More data points are useful to show the future how batshit insane our policy choices are.

[-] Lev_Astov@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

What policy choices? He should have had his weapons confiscated after his recent issues under Maine's yellow flag laws, but the police did nothing once again.

[-] derekabutton@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

You answered it yourself. Police policy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

Don’t we already have ample data to support that? Like, what could we learn that would make a difference? I’m not being facetious, I’m honestly asking.

in an ideal world, what would move the needle?

[-] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 11 points 8 months ago

Data is data. A guy being interviewed about how he came to his plan, the setbacks he had, what his goals were, etc.

Like, are the victims just dumb luck because he originally intended a different plan that could have had higher casualties?

A deader body is also easier to sweep under the rug, can’t happen again cause we caught him, etc etc. No worries about further court dates, or him talking about his love for guns…

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago

Sure, I get that. My career was like 80% data.

You also have to know when to stop wasting time collecting data and start spending that energy on solutions, because the data becomes redundant.

We’ve got soooooo much data on what motivates people; we’ve got excruciatingly intricate data on exactly how and why they do these things. We know which solutions are likely to work and which definitely don’t.

We need to stop endlessly analysing and start fixing this shit. We know what’s broken, so let’s stop talking about what and why and how, and start implementing solutions, like now.

The problem is there’s little public will to fix things – little ability to see these as preventable tragedies – and too much looking and hoping and denying.

Don’t worry though – there are another couple of hundred people waking up today who will be dead next month and over whose corpses we can continue this debate. I really hope nobody reading this comment will be one of them.

(Sorry for the snark; I’m beyond exhausted with this.)

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 14 points 8 months ago

We’ve learnt all we can from these psychopaths, to be honest.

What makes you believe this?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

It really disappoints me to see people say this when the dude clearly had mental issues, potentiated by the Army. It clearly says that the dude was hearing voices and wanted to shoot up a military base and everyone was like " 🤷‍♂️ let's throw him in a psych ward for two weeks, that will fix the issue".

Dude didn't get the help he needed, that was someone's child too....

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

He got all the help anyone could give him. We simply can't cure "I'm hearing voices and want to kill people" in a couple of weeks.

What we can do is ensure that it's not cheaper, faster and easier to go on a killing spree instead of recovering.

But that might impact the profits of the gun lobby, so they insist we instead cure every single person of every single mental health problem before they kill people with their legal guns.

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's possible for both things to be valid. I'm not American so the whole owning guns thing is weird to me anyway but surely the bare minimum is banning weapons that are expressly made for killing humans, like hand guns and assault weapons.

But alongside that, it's a fact that this guy did not get the help he needed, certainly not all the help anyone could give him. Two weeks on a ward is nowhere near enough time to treat someone in acute psychosis.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 30 points 8 months ago

These maga-cult psychos should kill themselves first and go on the killing spree second. Ban guns.

[-] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

Until next time. Stay safe out there guys.

[-] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 23 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SirToxicAvenger@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

glad to hear that he's not at large - but it's unfortunate he wont be forced to stand trial and brought to justice for his crimes.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

I'm fine with taxpayers not having to pay to jail him for decades.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

I’m all for archive links and all, but what the fuck is this:

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

What a coward... I regret not being able to give him his day in court and hold him in a concrete box for the rest of his long life.

load more comments (28 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago
[-] Zevlen@slrpnk.net 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Sorry, I just fixed it

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
189 points (91.6% liked)

News

21752 readers
3873 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS