this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
146 points (98.7% liked)

politics

21141 readers
3409 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The list:

  • Harvard University
  • George Washington University
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • New York University
  • Northwestern University
  • the University of California, Los Angeles
  • the University of California, Berkeley
  • the University of Minnesota
  • the University of Southern California.
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

This has nothing to do with antisemitism and everything with oligarchic takeover of academia. The goal is to inflict financial pain on the largest research universities located in states where republicans have limited power. Many of these universities (at least the private ones) will be able to offset some of the financial deficits through accepting private donations that will increase the influence of donors over university policies, so they can realign them with the oligarchs.

In the meantime, the big name universities will start applying for private grants making those unattainable for smaller institutions, so this financial pain will "trickle down". The long-term effect will be, fewer PhDs, fewer people wanting to do science, fewer people coming to the USA to do research and will overall put an end to US scientific supremacy that has always relied on brain drain anyway.

Just another great example how trump and trumpists don't understand geopolitics (they are triggering nuclear rearmament), and they don't understand science either (they want scientific solutions, like carbon capture, but hate scientists who figure these out).

The GOP is trying to portray itself as the "anti elitism party", but in reality they are simply the financial elite's party attacking the intellectual elite. Ironically what draws working people towards the GOP is the idea that one day they'll become rich-rich. In reality, helping people to get an education is a much more realistic goal and would actually help society as a whole.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Pretty shocking that nobody has even mentioned palestine (or even the zio regime "israel") in these comments as of now.

This is all about supporting genocide. That's a crucial foundation of fascism.

The NYTimes is garbage and intentionally obscuring these facts/context. They just recycle the "antisemitism" bullshit. This is how they promote Trump and fascism more generally. Disgusting rag.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 34 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

These schools spent hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars to pay cops to kick the shit out of their own students, and they got defunded anyway.

[–] javacafe01@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Are you talking about campus police across all the universities? You aren't wrong that they are terrible, but the amount of funding for campus police is not that much and nothing compared to what's required for research.

My girlfriend used to work at a lab at a top university during her undergrad helping postdocs with their research for treating Alzheimer's. What they do there is groundbreaking, but expensive. Postdocs don't even get paid well; most of their funding goes directly into research. Cutting the funding does not help anyone at all.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Are you talking about campus police across all the universities?

Campus police, plus regular police brought in who usually charge the university. Common rates include ~100/hour for overtime, plus 100/cop/day for food, and other expenses like tiergas and cuffs.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

"tiergas"? what are we, animals?:)

Ad homonym jokes aside, as a university researcher I was absolutely disgusted by Columbia's approach to the protests. They literally approached this the worst way possible and spilled gasoline on fire. However, this is just an excuse to divide public opinion while they are actually aiming to defund top universities. If you punch a few $100M holes in university budgets it will kill research first. And that's the goal.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

They are more than rich enough from milking their students. Most of them could be admission free if they wanted.

[–] javacafe01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago

That's only the case for private schools. Public research schools like UofM and UCLA (which are on that list) 100% rely on funding. Their research is groundbreaking and cutting their funding will not do any good.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

If Harvard capitulates I Hope they end up decimated anyhow. They've got enough money in their endowment to give Donald Trump a hundred middle fingers.

[–] javacafe01@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

From that list the ones heavily impacted are going to be the public schools.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

don't get your hopes up. Harvard has billions and billions on private endowments. They are gonna be impacted the least.

[–] javacafe01@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I'm very worried. I just started my Master's program, and after I'll be finished in about 1-2 years, I plan to apply to PhD programs around the country. It's already super competitive, and with the upcoming funding cuts, I might not even get accepted anywhere in the U.S.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Academia is a dead end job for the vast majority of people. The money goes to administrators and football coaches while teachers are adjunctified into poverty. Get out while you can.

[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The pulled funding ought to ne more specifically defined. Is he canceling cancer research? 100% chance he is canceling at least something worthwhile.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I think the state just gives money to these grifters for the service of violently supporting hegemony, zionism, genocide, capitalism, imperialism, etc.