this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
372 points (98.4% liked)

politics

21567 readers
4237 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It is not illegal for consumers to boycott companies. The Supreme Court in 1982 ruled the First Amendment protects Americans’ rights to protest private businesses.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chmod755@feddit.org 9 points 4 hours ago

Make Tesla owners ashamed

[–] rizo@sh.itjust.works 17 points 6 hours ago

Funny how they preach "the market will regulate itself" until it regulates itself in the "wrong direction". And all of a sudden something needs to be done by "the government".

[–] umbraroze@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, guess I'm technically not boycotting Tesla. I just straight up can't afford a car, not in this economy. Nor do I care, because there's a bus stop just down the street. Not that I'm intimidated by Trump because I'm not American and he can't prosecute this shit even domestically.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 4 hours ago

not using twitter counts.

[–] Hafler@lemm.ee 9 points 6 hours ago

Something something free market?

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 14 points 7 hours ago

Soooo ... Trump thinks he can force people to buy Teslas? Just like Elon is trying (and failing) to sue companies for not advertising on Twitter.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago

Nazis helping fund nazis…

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago

“Mr. Trump, you just attempted to overthrow the government of the Leader of the Free World™️, convinced the supreme court to hand you unlimited authority, and you still got elected president! What are you gonna do now?”

“I’m going to Disneyland!”

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

So, a boycott is illegal, protest of Tesla outlets is terrorism. Do We the People get to have any say?

[–] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Trump: No, and now it's illegal for you not to like me.

[–] Slax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Uh.. You still get to choose what you wear... As long as it is on this approved list of companies

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

And a MAGA cap, of course.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

I'm assuming Kanye's Yeezy trash will be approved by the Ministry of Freedom?

[–] Curmudge_john@lazysoci.al 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They're panicking. The boycotts are working.

I don't think they're panicking, this is how they always behave. Trump is saying a moronic thing again to draw attention from the actual important authoritarian shift onto "what stupid meaningless shit did he say". It's the same fucking playbook every time.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

This shit is such bottom of the barrel trump antics

He has always cried fowl when anyone is critical

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Let alone try to exercise their limited power

[–] LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If it was one of his businesses I'd agree. But this is bottom of the barrel AND makes him look like a weak little lapdog for Musk.

[–] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

This is his playbook with politics, business, PR in general

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 20 points 15 hours ago

Felon rapist says what?

[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 15 hours ago

Elon to Trump: "I can't fund 2026 midterm candidates if Tesla goes broke"

Trump:

[–] segabased@lemmy.zip 26 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Even if boycotting were illegal how in the fuck would that be enforceable?

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Simple, just put out an EO requiring every citizen to purchase a Tesla.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 9 points 13 hours ago

He'd also need to put out an EO making it illegal to wipe your ass with an EO.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 33 points 18 hours ago (8 children)

Wait what

How the fuck are you gonna force me to buy a Tesla

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 5 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

Haven't you seen all those cops outside the Tesla shops recently?

[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 hours ago

I think that even if I wanted to buy anything from Tesla, I would turn around if I saw a bunch of cops outside of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Enkers@sh.itjust.works 106 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Someone's being a pissbaby because nobody wants to buy stuff from fascists. Lul.

This makes me think he just has no idea what a boycott is, because for it to be illegal, purchasing a Tesla would some how have to be legally mandate.

[–] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 hours ago

This is probably just a ploy to boost Tesla sales among his followers. And honestly, I'll play the part of "owned lib" if it transitions MAGAs to EVs. Better than rolling coal.

[–] officermike@lemmy.world 27 points 21 hours ago

Don't give them ideas.

[–] Vanderdeckenscopilot@lemmy.world 69 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

This seems hypocritical. Didn't all those "Snowflakes" boycott Budweiser last year?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Yeah, but: Budweiser ghey.

Checkmate, liberals!

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Yes, but no (not trying to be contrarian) because I felt it was definitely before last year

The Budweiser boycott started 2 years ago April 2023

But YES those are the same snowflakes

[–] mstrk@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago
[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Pity he's a liar and won't actually use one, I like the thought of him being on fire.

[–] medusadeluxe@lemm.ee 13 points 18 hours ago

The thought of him on fire gives me more joy than it should.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 62 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 20 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Common misconception.

Land of the fee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 55 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Trump said “radical left lunatics” are “illegally and collusively” boycotting Tesla, which the president described as one of the best automakers in the world. This action, Trump said, was meant as an attack on Musk and what he stands for.

It is not illegal for consumers to boycott companies. The Supreme Court in 1982 ruled the First Amendment protects Americans’ rights to protest private businesses.

This is pretty much the reason high ranking government officials are supposed to be divested....

Also:

Tesla shares popped more than 4% in Tuesday morning trading. In addition to Trump’s promotion of Tesla, the stock may also be helped by a note to clients from Morgan Stanley advising them to pick up shares after the steep decline.

Sounds like Morgan Stanley doesn't want to be left holding the bag...

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/13/morgan-stanley-ups-tesla-target-gives-bull-case-of-800.html

Less than two months ago they predicted it would go up to 800 so they told people to buy it...

Instead it dropped to 200, and they're still telling people to buy it.

When an investment company just always tells people to buy a stock regardless of what happens, it usually means they're heavily invested, so the higher the price the more they make.

So there likely is illegal manipulation happening, it's just trying to do the opposite of what's happening

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Baphomet_The_Blasphemer@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

Hey, anyone heard from the My Pillow guy lately? It's almost like there's been a dozen or more recent examples of why it's a bad idea to tie your political beliefs to your business.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ahahaha the felon saying voting with your wallet is illegal. Couldn't make this shit up if you tried.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

"It's illegal to boycott" translates to "You're legally required to buy this product". Anyone who can't see that that is completely moronic bullshit already has there head up Trump and/or Elon's ass for the delicate aroma.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Nice! Turn teslas into rolling MAGA bumper stickers!

What I love about this that it already takes twice as much to insure a model Y to my comparably sized EV. if Teslas are gonna get disproportionately vandalized I wouldn’t be shocked if insurance premiums will go up further. So even if the cars value drops, the movement can still offset that with increasing the cost of ownership.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm kind of hoping that between MAGA bros buying Teslas to support Musk and leftists buying other EVs because it's better for the environment we'll effectively retire internal combustion engines.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›