this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
189 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23167 readers
3307 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

An expert on the federal work force estimates that the speed and chaos of Musk’s cuts to the bureaucracy will cost taxpayers $135 billion this fiscal year.

Trump and Elon Musk promised taxpayers big savings, maybe even a “DOGE dividend” check in their mailboxes, when DOGE was let loose on the federal government. Now, as he prepares to step back, Musk has said without providing details that DOGE is likely to save taxpayers only $150 billion.

That is about 15% of the $1 trillion he pledged to save, less than 8% of the $2 trillion in savings he had originally promised and a fraction of the nearly $7 trillion the federal government spent in the 2024 fiscal year.

The errors and obfuscations underlying DOGE’s claims of savings are well documented. Less known are the costs Musk incurred by taking what Trump called a “hatchet” to government and the resulting firings, agency lockouts and building seizures that mostly wound up in court.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LastWish@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's wild to think that he could

[–] joyjoy@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's wild to think that he would

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

That's why you make him. He's too sociopathic to admit failure.

He deserves to be stripped of his wealth and spend the rest of how life in federal prison, but the US is a fascist dictatorship now, so he's Himmler.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (1 children)

DOGE didn't save a single cent. But it will cost us all a lot.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Turns out firing workers, but having to continue to contractually to pay them, does not save money, and.... surprise, loses productivity.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"savings" was never the goal. Deregulation was. If you destroy the agencies that make you protect the environment, ensure your food is safe, and that you don't get sick, there is nothing in the way of removing controls that make capitalist billionaires do those things.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 day ago

Anyone who thought doge was a good idea should not participate in politics, nor make decisions of greater import than "what flavor ice cream do you want?"

[–] circledot@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

It was never about saving money. At least not the citizen's.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 1 points 22 hours ago

What? Noooo…

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The savings for his businesses: priceless.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Good thing it was never about savings then isn't it.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

This is FAKE NEWS! ELON told me they saved TRILLIONS and THATS why we can Now Afford to give HIM, ELON MUSK, BILLIONS in New Government Contracts! Also my Child died in the Factory because his School lost Funding and the Family Needed ANOTHER Source of Income because Elon FIRED me! But that's a SMALL PRICE to PAY for all these SAVINGS and Elon Contracts!

-People who ARENT in a Cult and Care about Others!

It's unclear to me how they even could save taxpayers anything. It's not like when they fire a government employee, the money shows up in people's tax returns. I suppose they could fire the entire IRS so you just don't have to pay taxes at all, but then I guess you aren't a "taxpayer", and thus not worthy of consideration.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yup and they will want to put it all on debt after they screwed the bond market instead of something a fiscal conservative would do like collect the taxes for it because there has been no actual conservatism since reagan except for possibly bush senior.