this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
571 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

9587 readers
2020 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CircaV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 minute ago

It’s beautiful

[–] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I am a fan. I have joy.

[–] theotherbelow@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not Canadian, Thank you Canada, there is hope after all.

[–] MyBrainHurts@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

There's hope but this was too close. The Conservatives upped their numbers as did the Liberals. It was only the progressive/reasonable vote banding together that saved the day.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 37 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

So crazy that the Conservative Party still has 144 seats given that they've basically signed on to a policy of foreign occupation.

Feels like I'm watching liberated France send Philippe Pétain back in as the Loyal Opposition with 40% of the vote.

[–] LostWon@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

That's not what their base believes. There is a whole other fantasy reality in their channels about how Carney has planned all along to cut a secret deal with Trump after the election. Other justification narratives probably exist as well, because they have to keep people believing that obviously, everyone knows we couldn't possibly do anything other than completely fold into Trump's plans. They spew propagandistic garbage like this and teach people to distrust legit media that understands context and checks facts rather than running with conspiracy theories based on flimsy evidence.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

The conservatives still turned out a lot of votes. The left just voted strategically to keep them out. Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again. Given the parties recent history even if it isn't Poilievre I'm sure they will pick another alt right sycophant.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Next election the left will split again and we will get the conservatives again.

Rather than settling for the investment banker, they could all rally around a candidate that's interested in social good.

The Left doesn't have to split.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 26 minutes ago

The left has to get their shit together before that can happen. Right now the left cares more about purity tests over being effective.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Not if we have ranked choice voting with proportional representation.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 24 minutes ago

Ranked choice doesn't make sense in a proportional representation system.

[–] boughtmysoul@lemmy.world 26 points 7 hours ago
[–] Tigeroovy@lemmy.ca 12 points 6 hours ago

Thoroughly hilarious. Go away Chode boy, nobody likes you!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 25 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

If Canada had Australian-style preferential voting (i.e. you numbered your candidates in order of preference, and if your first choice got eliminated, your vote cascaded to your second, and so on until it was tallied for your least-disliked of the two leading candidates), the Liberals would have a significantly more comfortable margin (assuming that they got most of the Greens’ preferences and at least half of the NDP)

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I believe the whole world would be in much better shape if everyone handled elections like Australia. We certainly wouldn't have had Trump ever here. When more people vote the Democrats win every time.

I strongly support mandatory voting. If you're against voting at all for whatever reason, just turn in a blank form. And I'm no big fan of the Democrats, but they wouldn't be kidnapping people to send them to concentration camps.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 21 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

We were supposed to get election reform after the liberals won in 2015 and I'm still quite bitter about it

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

You will never get it top down. The major parties all prefer and benefit from different systems.

If you truely care about electoral reform your best bet is bottom up. Start getting your preferred form into municipal elections. We almost had that in Ontario until Doug showed up and fucked us.

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Actually, I live in the first municipality in Canada to use ranked choice voting-- until the provincial government enacted a bill that disallowed it in 2020.

I've also been around long enough to have voted in the last Ontario referendum on the topic. It did not go well because people didn't understand what was being proposed. Same story for BC's referendum.

I'm merely pointing out the recurring theme over the last couple of decades where the LPC will make electoral reform promises they never fulfill.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Same regarding the last referendum. When that happened I knew for sure it had to be introduced in a smaller lower stakes way which is why I was pretty happy when London used ranked choice (a bright spot for a city whose politicians suck more often than not). Removing that is one of the things I hate most about Doug.

Oh my God you are so right about London politicians.

Remember those useless board of control parasites clinging to their pointless jobs? Or the Liberal legend Joe Fontana?

thisisfine.gif

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Well I'm sure they'll change the status quo that favors them this time.

Not holding my breath

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 13 points 8 hours ago

FUCK OFF BACK HOME PIERRE HAHAHAHAHAHA 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 39 points 10 hours ago (9 children)

A very important thing to remember this election: The Conservatives had a 30-point lead and were set to gain over 200 seats in a sweeping majority victory and they blew it. They blew it and their leader lost his own seat. The fact we even have a Liberal minority at all is incredible.

So while the Conservative party still has a lot of seats, enough Canadians disliked PP and his campaign enough to erode a 30 point lead. PP says he is staying on as party leader but his party would be incredibly foolish to keep him. His campaign cost them a historical election victory and the dude can't even get elected in his own riding.

Happy that the Trump presidency could at least contribute one positive outcome.

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trump won the election for the liberals more than anyone else.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 11 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (4 children)

Nah, the Liberals deserve the bigger credit. I don't necessarily think they could have won without Trump shitting the fan for Conservatives but their actions created the necessary conditions for the win: 1) Drop Trudeau; 2) Don't pick Freeland, pick a white middle age man from the finance industry; 3) Get rid of the consumer carbon pricing; 4) Focus on the economy instead of progressive values. Without any of these, it would have been a CPC win even with Poilievre wearing a MAGA hat.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

PP says he is staying on as party leader but his party would be incredibly foolish to keep him. His campaign cost them a historical election victory and the dude can’t even get elected in his own riding.

You're not thinking like a Conservative MP. Yess PP lost the run for PM and humiliatingly lost his riding, but overall the party grew in influence and in number of seats tremendously under his leadership. We're now closer to a two party system, and Conservatives benefit from this tremendously. CPC ate the PPC. I'm 100% sure that they're chucking this loss to bad luck with Trump timing, they had to reinvent themselves in 3 months. With 2 years of planning (and bootlicking down south), they'll be better prepared and Poilievre is their winning strategy. In this cycle, the CPC successfully FPTP'ed the NDP and the Greens out of existence. They're well positioned to a minority govt with Bloc in a few years.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Yess PP lost the run for PM and humiliatingly lost his riding, but overall the party grew in influence and in number of seats tremendously under his leadership.

I agree the Conservatives have grown in influence but I don't believe it was because of Poilievre. It doesn't matter who leads the conservative party, the Canadian pendulum was due to swing back to the Cons, he dropped the ball hard, and probably still would have won if it wasn't for Trump slapping Canada in the face and waking a bunch of us up. Any influence gained was because it was "their turn", not Poilievre's leadership.

The question is, did the Conservatives come close to winning because of Poilievre, or did they lose a sure thing because of him? Based on what things looked like 6 months ago, I'd say the latter.

Yeah, I don't think people wanted Poilievre specifically. They just wanted change.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

the Canadian pendulum was due to swing back to the Cons

Sure, for the opposition leader it's a matter of adding or removing momentum to the pendulum swing. He definitely added a lot of momentum, to the point that the Liberals had to throw the PM and its climate policy under the bus to get one more term. That's a hell of an effective opposition leader.

Any influence gained was because it was “their turn”, not Poilievre’s leadership.

I'm not saying that he's a genius or anything, but making good use of your "turn" is not an easy task. He has demonstrated that he's good at it, to the point of landslide victory projections 6 months ago.

would have won if it wasn’t for Trump slapping Canada in the face

And that's exactly why it's going to be easy to brush off his loss. Sure, he'll face criticism on his failure to pivot the party messaging post-Trudeau, but that was a nearly impossible situation. Would any other CPC MP have done a better job of riling up the conservatives against the Liberals without in the end get blindsided by anti-republican sentiments? Jamil Jivani? I don't see any reason to believe the CPC will have a better shot with someone else.

If they do end up booting Poilievre out of the leader seat, it will be because the CPC is a bucket of selfish snakes and lizards vying for power. It is possible. Surely someone is salivating at this opportunity. I just find it unlikely, because the vast majority of MPs are satisfied with his work and will simply bide their time, they'll be better prepared in two years.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 minutes ago

Look at the polling. When asked which party people preferred (ignoring leadership) the CPC had way more support than when leadership is considered.

Did you notice the CPC ads in the last week and a half didn't have PP in them? It's obvious to everyone (including CPC strategists) that PP drug down the CPC. If the CPC didn't even have a leader, they would've won. But PP led them to defeat.

But I'm not a Conservative, so if half of the CPC wants to remain faithful to PP, I'll get out my popcorn and enjoy the CPC civil war that'll happen if PP refuses to step aside.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 hours ago

I disagree that he is effective in anything other than being not Trudeau and being a contrarian in the American conservative mold. If he was at all a good politician he would not have fumbled this election the way he did. The liberals made some good plays but if PP had spent one minute reading the room instead of playing party over country he might have been PM.

If he manages to hang around until the next one he will probably get in when the left splits again but it won't be because he's good at his job it will be because he has a pulse and a name on the ballot under conservative.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 hours ago (4 children)

PP gone forever? Or is CPC somehow going to give him another seat so he can stay leader?

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They can’t give him someone else’s seat. They can ask someone else to resign their seat and he can run in a byelection for that seat but the prime minister (Carney) can wait up to 6 months before calling the byelection, which itself can have a campaign period of up to 50 days.

So if Carney wants to, he can keep PP out of office until at least next year.

The other cool thing is that PP is no longer eligible to occupy Stornoway House, the residence of the leader of the official opposition, since PP no longer has a seat. This means he has to move out and he loses access to the $200k year budget for household staff. So he’ll have to get out there and look for housing like the rest of us plebs (though he can easily afford it).

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

Whoever the conservatives choose as parliamentary leader can defer it to him according to CBC, so he shouldn't have to move out.

I wish he'd try working a real job for once in his life.

But realistically, if he we're going to step down willingly it would have occurred last night. We'll see if the party sacrifices another MP to let him stay on. Fucking guy.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 hours ago

The latter. This ghoul is not going away.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, that's where the drama will unfold next. Will there be a civil war, and how many factions will be involved?

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Split the right like the left? Sorry, I can only get so erect

[–] ibelieveinthehousehippo@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Are you young?

The whole saga of how the modern CPC came to fruition was such a back stabby shitshow

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 1 points 25 minutes ago

It all started that day Day road up on that seadoo...

Actually I'll never forget Air Farce lampooning Preston Manning, good times.

load more comments
view more: next ›