822
submitted 7 months ago by kinther@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 218 points 7 months ago

"we're not doing illegal, and no you can't check."

-People doing illegal things

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 149 points 7 months ago

How to tell you are running a cartel, step #1:

[-] foggy@lemmy.world 32 points 7 months ago

The cartel says the CIA shouldnt investigate cocaine prices.

[-] Unlocalhost@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

Cocaine prices have made little to no change even though recessions, my friend tells me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 123 points 7 months ago

Internet providers say the FCC should not investigate broadband prices

And that's exactly why broadband prices should be investigated.

[-] TryingToEscapeTarkov@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago

Yeah they should do it even harder and faster now. Now I'm horny.

[-] Rememo@kbin.social 104 points 7 months ago

Make internet access a utility and be done with it.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

Seriously. Why is this taking so long!? It’s painfully obvious!

[-] SupraMario@lemmy.world 35 points 7 months ago

Because the ISPs don't want to have to do what we made them do for phone lines. Even though the trillion dollars we have given them over the last 30 years should have come with that stipulation...but they took that money and bought our politicians with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 87 points 7 months ago

In my native country gigabit fiber internet is less than $9/mo. Broadband prices in the US are absolutely ridiculous.

[-] Otkaz@lemmy.world 20 points 7 months ago

Good God I pay 90 a month for 1 gig fiber. What county are you in?

[-] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago
[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

W. H. A. T.

Sorry, it's so hard to believe, you have to explain how.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AirlineF0od@lemm.ee 10 points 7 months ago

I pay 99.95 a month for 50 megs gotta love the local phone cmpny

[-] lunarul@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

That's Romania. But I live in the US now.

[-] ichbinjasokreativ@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

I pay 40€ a month for 250 MBit in Germany :(

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

50€ for 1000/1000 here. My employer covers it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

I pay Comcast $130 for 1000/35

Just Internet, no bundles.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 82 points 7 months ago

My three year old often says "Dad don't look!" When he does that, I know for a fact he's doing something he shouldn't be doing.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 67 points 7 months ago

The title alone is a great reason to investigate broadband prices.

[-] xyguy@startrek.website 60 points 7 months ago

Good thing broadband providers have such a stellar track record of nothing but honorable and consumer-benefiting behavior. I see no reason that we can't just trust that they have our best interests at heart.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 59 points 7 months ago

If any business tells the government that it should not look to closely into it's practices, then you know that there is something that needs to be brought to the light and corrected.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 9 points 7 months ago

It’s like a teenager telling their mom she doesn’t need to check the browser history

[-] ohlaph@lemmy.world 54 points 7 months ago

Criminal doesn't want to be investigated.

[-] jmd_akbar@aussie.zone 47 points 7 months ago

Yup. Totally not a suspicious thing to say...

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago

I agree, the FCC shouldn't waste time investigating broadband prices. Just nationalize them. And the rest of infrastructure.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 35 points 7 months ago

Serial killers say the FBI should stay out of their dark mysterious shed

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

What about bathrooms, are those still safe?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago

Pay no attention to the piles of money behind the curtain!

[-] db2@sopuli.xyz 34 points 7 months ago

"We promise not to eat any more faces," said a spokeswolf for the Wolves Eating Faces Corporation.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

According to Marx, the capitalist will always dismiss all other concerns than their own gain, and will lie and murder for their ill-gotten gains.

The 21st century teems of examples

This week's Behind the Bastards (about the capture of Christianity by capitalism) tells about the exact same thing in the 1930s and 1940s (parallel with the rise of fascism). The same give us all the money push was happening tgen as now, only now the campaign is bigger.

Fuck these guys. They're no better than nineteenth century railroad tycoons

Edit 2024-01-14: Markup.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yeah, same podcast made the point in their episodes about the Hawk's Nest Tunnel Project, and how it was recent history even though it sounds like some medieval horror story. These fucks haven't changed, and the same company that profited off that brutality is still around and still making money hand over fist and never reckoned with their crimes.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

Don’t try that Jedi shit on me it doesn’t work.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago
[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 9 points 7 months ago

Oh god the wipe transitions. I remember when the original trilogy was being remade into... I think the Gold version? I watched bts stuff and George was explaining how they'd added wipes to the scene transitions. Like, cool new CGI and all, but maybe adding wipes over the entire thing is kind of taking the piss.

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago

I’ve been a big fan of my internet provider for not playing these games, until this year. Them: “ you owe more every month”, me: “you’re raising prices?”, them: “no, prices remain the same and you can continue on your existing plan, but you need to pay more”

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rebul@kbin.social 20 points 7 months ago

"Trust me, the cheese is fine"- Mouse assigned to guard the cheese

[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 19 points 7 months ago
[-] buzz86us@lemmy.world 17 points 7 months ago

🤣🤣😅😅😅🤣🤣🤣 Not biased at all. I have a $20 price lock on spectrum ATM, but as soon as that ends I'm going to say goodbye and get 5G because I'm not paying $50 for fixed internet they have a monopoly in the area I've moved to.

[-] Joe-Blow240@kbin.social 14 points 7 months ago

Methinks the corporation doth protest too much.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 11 points 7 months ago

I say the same thing to the police about my drugs

[-] Kata1yst@kbin.social 7 points 7 months ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In 2021, Congress required the Federal Communications Commission to issue rules "preventing digital discrimination of access based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin" within two years.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel last month released her draft plan to comply with the congressional mandate and scheduled a November 15 commission vote on adopting final rules.

Carr described Rosenworcel's proposal as "President Biden's plan to give the administrative state effective control of all Internet services and infrastructure in the US."

In a meeting with Rosenworcel's staff, cable company executives "stated that the Draft Order would impose overbroad liability standards that impede further broadband investment and are legally vulnerable by adopting a disparate impact rather than a disparate treatment liability approach," according to an ex parte filing submitted yesterday by cable lobby group NCTA-The Internet & Television Association.

The cable companies said the FCC "should define digital discrimination as disparate treatment and should limit the standard to policies and practices involving the deployment of broadband network facilities.

"Commission evaluation of price is unnecessary in the competitive wireless marketplace and may deter offering discounts and enticements to switch providers that consumers enjoy today."


The original article contains 688 words, the summary contains 192 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2023
822 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

55610 readers
2310 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS