this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
400 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

14509 readers
2388 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 71 points 1 day ago

Alt-text:

In addition to gravity, burritos interact through the strong, weak, and electromagnetic forces, which is believed to be a major contributor to their popularity.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 63 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Dark matter is the computer running the simulation.
They blacklisted all simulated forces from interacting with it, but one of the devs commented out gravitation for a test and forgot to put it back in.

[–] match@pawb.social 9 points 1 day ago

seems like it'd be the opposite, it's the dummy particle used for testing gravity and they didn't take it out

[–] hansolo@lemm.ee 19 points 1 day ago

Dont forget, it's also a fuckton of ghosts.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm leaning in more to this is all a simulation and we have discovered the physics engine by trial and error but the hard coded rules behind it are as understandable to us as it would be to Mario

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is theoretical physics just reverse engineering the physics engine by playing with variables and tracking the changes?

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 5 points 1 day ago

I mean as someone that studied theoretical physics... Yeah basically.

We set up a bunch of math we expect to happen given the circumstances and then observe an incident that matches the conditions to see if it matched. It's fun when it does and concerns people when it doesn't but we have just reverse engineered the parts we can see and guess on the parts we can't.

[–] mattd@programming.dev 43 points 1 day ago
[–] Malgas@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago

I wonder if this was inspired by a koan:

A monk asked Tozan, "What is the Buddha?"
He replied, "Three pounds of flax."

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What is "is"? Doesn't matter, burrito time. 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯 🌯

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ouRKaoS 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually, it's a little under 9.1 kilograms, but "about 20 pounds" has less syllables.

[–] ArtemisimetrA@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago

But is it heavier or lighter than 9.1 kilograms of feathers?

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago

Fair enough

At the first three panels I thought this was a conversation with a stochastic parrot