this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
428 points (92.8% liked)

Games

32663 readers
1413 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

While Take-Two is riding high on their announcement that a GTA 6 trailer is coming, its CEO has some…interesting ideas on how much video games could cost, part of a contingent of executives that believe games are underpriced, given their cost, length or some combination of the two.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 296 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Thank fuck for indie devs making the best games right now at an affordable price.

I have over a thousand games in my steam library and my most played is dominated by indie games.

[–] guyrocket@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago (36 children)

I am curious which indie titles you would recommend.

[–] taaz@biglemmowski.win 199 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)
[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (6 children)

In addition to that:

  • Atom RPG;
  • Dead Cells;
  • Into the breach;
  • Shadowrun series;
  • This war of mine;
  • Dust - An Elysian Tail;
  • Broforce;
  • Bastion;

Many more of course.

[–] ShitOnABrick@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In addition to these games I find these games below to be an absolute hoot

  • disco elysium
  • beamng drive
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 155 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The problem is an hour of what. Me wandering around trying to find something described vaguely and being frustrated, is not the same as an hour of well written and interesting dialogue.

[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do people get refund if the game have a bug or a glitch that slow them down?

[–] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Or hell, what if I play the game for 20 minutes and hate it? Do they pay me? Do I give them 25 cents?

[–] ArghZombies@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An hour of grinding - that they will also sell you powerups to help you skip that grind.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] alienanimals@lemmy.world 151 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stupid metric by some rich asshole who is solely focused on making more money.

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read something like this and my immediate thought is “torches, pitchforks, guillotines.”

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 121 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Theoretically he can go fuck himself. All that is going to do is make games drag out mindless crap with no actual value entertainment-wise.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] obelix@lemmy.world 121 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Sounds like someone wants me to not buy their overpriced game.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sure, great idea, why wouldn't I want more low quality padding content in my games? It's not like they already have too much of it.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's a subscription. He should try it and see how that goes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] otp@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The less someone actually plays games, the more this idea will make sense to them.

Gamers, especially older gamers, will know this is a BS metric.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] echo64@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

Because everyone here is just reacting to the terrible Forbes headline because that's all people do. Here's the actual content that you can pick apart, instead of picking apart the headline that some Forbes editor wrote.

he thinks GTA is one of the best values on the market. Here’s what he said:

"In terms of our pricing for any entertainment property, basically the algorithm is the value of the expected entertainment usage, which is to say the per hour value times the number of expected hours plus the terminal value that's perceived by the customer in ownership, if the title is owned rather than rented or subscribed to."

So he was just saying that gta is good value for money given their metrics

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

He can still go fuck himself. I was promised single player DLC in GTA 5 and instead they put their entire focus on GTA online which I'm sure will continue with 6. I'll probably pirate it because, as much as I hate to admit it I'm still a fan, but I'm not giving them another cent.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago

Executives are assholes and should not be listened to, ever.

[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 54 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Can't wait for them to try this, it flops, half the staff gets laid off, the CEO steps down with a golden parachute, the CEO trades places with the CEO of another tech company, that new CEO makes an even worse decision, another half of the staff gets laid off, the new CEO gets a raise, Microsoft buys both companies, Google makes a competing game studio that gets killed before their first game release, and Apple releases their first video game for $3000 that only runs on M2 and above.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] sirdorius@programming.dev 51 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I've often come across this sentiment in Steam reviews and it's very reductive to judge games based mainly on this metric. Getting older I have less time for videogames and I value shorter games more. There are games that are extremely valuable because of their high quality even if very short, like the first Portal.

This is why we have companies like Ubisoft trying to game the system constantly with low quality content to pad the game to 100 hours or whatever is fashionable in open world these days. I will take 6 hours of quality single player anytime over 100 hours of AssCreed grinding and ridiculous 'story'

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree, that's why i think Take Two owe me $23 because i finished GTAV in 37 hours.

Though i hope Wube, Bethesda, and Fromsoft won't bill me for my playtime...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 47 points 1 year ago

Well, fuck them, at this point indie games are often better than AAA titles anyway.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 45 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ok so somebody should ask this CEO how he expects gamers to pay potentially $200 per game.

What an idiot, games are priced at what the market will bear and they've pretty much reached that limit now.

[–] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 53 points 1 year ago

When you get paid in 6-7 digits annually, ideas start to form that the peasants aren't paying you enough of their 2 digits.

He's out of touch and thinking about profit, like the blizz ceo pushing games-as-a-service

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nexussapphire@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always prefer a good 5 hour experience over a bland 60 hour experience.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hydroel@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If video games were priced by hours of dev time, I could kind of agree (with the theory, in practice it doesn't really make sense). But let's be honest here - that's not what he means at all.

[–] dpkonofa@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not only is it not what he means but this same asshole would probably force devs to add padded objectives just so he could claim it takes more hours to finish. The new GTA will have 1000 missions where you have to walk across the whole map to retrieve some object that needs to be walked back to the other side if this dick gets his way. It’ll be the first game in history where it takes 2 years to 100% it and costs $200 so it’s a steal - only $100 per year of gameplay!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 38 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Man, imagine if movies or books charged you by the hour. Lord of the Rings would make bank!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Then why are not GTA games priced at $20-30?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EarWorm@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unrelated question, does anyone know any good pirate sites?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course it's a Forbes article.

[–] Amends1782@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 year ago

Forbes says companies should make more money. Wow hot take Forbes thanks

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're gonna price it at 100$, i can feel it in ny bones

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] filister@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

So practically he wants to create a SaaS model to eternally milk their user base. As much as I like the game devs working for rockstar, their management is an utterly horrendous bunch of scums and in a way I wish that GTA6 is one giant flop.

[–] Mandy@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 year ago

LMAO yeah right, eat shit take two

[–] Enzy@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Good luck with that.

grabs pirate hat

[–] Wodge@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

MW3s campaign for $4. Cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By that logic, imagine how much a soccer ball will cost!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PieMePlenty@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Awesome proposal. Some indie games would suck me dry and I'd be paying 1/4 of the price for AAA releases! Is this the redistribution of wealth Marx has been talking about?

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Shit like this is why I pirate.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

So he's suggesting AAA games be about $5-$10 right?

[–] Jaysyn@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Any company that attacks modders can die in a fire. I for one won't be buying this crap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Filthmontane@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Check out my new game: Paint Drying Simulator! With real time paint drying action! 6000 hours of play time! Only $129.99!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh God, Factorio will cost me my life savings

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›