this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
66 points (98.5% liked)

politics

22668 readers
84 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to The Labour Community.

Take any slop posts to the slop trough

Main is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 68 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Chuds try to ban chemtrails, accidentally pass the strictest environmental regulations for aviation on Earth.

"Wait, what do you mean we banned all airplanes!?"

[–] Imnecomrade@hexbear.net 26 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Oh well, I guess we need to build high speed rail.

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 21 points 4 days ago (2 children)

South Dakotan isolationism, ensuring another century of irrelevance.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

Weird that the already currently existing syracuse station isn't on that map.

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 6 points 4 days ago

The Minneapolis to Duluth expansion is all but dead in the water.

[–] hexthismess@hexbear.net 45 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Can't release chemicals into the air" is the most restrictive and best for the environment policy they could have. I couldn't have come up with anything better, besides removal of chemicals from the air. Too bad it's built on rabid chuddery

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

That bill as written just bans air travel unless somebody wants to explain to me how emissions from burning jet fuel dont count as chemicals.

[–] Xenomorph@hexbear.net 30 points 4 days ago

The white lines coming out of planes are actually cum, they're mating.

[–] Crucible@hexbear.net 29 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Is it even physically possible to stop contrails from forming behind planes?

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

They form due to condensing water vapor as ice crystals, it’s dependant on temperature, humidity and pressure. It’s potentially the largest climate change factor from airtravel - not the burning of fuel, due to its own greenhouse effect (at least in the short term). But the jury is still out on that. The UK and presumably other nations are looking at reducing contrails through routing (at different altitudes in different weather conditions etc). So I guess this is accidentally not a bad idea but for the wrong reasons.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

How does the water vapor affect the climate?

[–] Palacegalleryratio@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because unlike water vapour in air, the ice crystals in the contrail reflect light (which is why we can see them) which causes a radiative forcing effect preventing infrared radiation leaving the earth, causing heating.

loads more information

[–] D61@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

Adds mass to a quantity of air, more mass means that quantity of air can absorb more heat and hold on to that heat longer.

Ice crystals, like Palacegalleryration pointed out, work like tin foil in an oven. The crystals work like a blanket that reflects some parts of sunlight back to Earth instead of continuing out to space.

[–] shallot@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago

Yea we just gotta heat up the air enough, and the good news is we’ve been working on it as hard as we can for years

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, if a state is actually fucking stupid enough to pass this and has an enforcement measure airlines might literally pull out of that state because otherwise they're going to constantly be fined for operating an airplane within the bounds of reality.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

New item on the ticket's fare, "Chemtrail Fee", incoming.

[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

you can do shapes where it doesn't happen as much but i forget what the tradeoff is

[–] dkr567@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)

So they're trying to ban planes from their sky? Not too sure how this would even work.

[–] Sleve_McDichael@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

Comrade red states combating climate change by banning air travel

[–] Dessa@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

We could pretend that airplanes in the night sky are like shooting stars

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Map of states that shouldn't be allowed to provide their input on actual issues.

[–] FishLake@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is such a non-issue when snipe hunting isn’t banned and the boogeyman is still at large.

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's funny that I don't need to know the geography of the USA to say that the lower one is Texas.

[–] Xenomorph@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bad thing? Texas, Florida, southern sates, plains states.

[–] Adkml@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Not this time! Hooray.

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Borrowing that map from the beer post the other day:

This shows PFA contamination of the municipal water supply (also breweries, but focus on the PFAs). Some very interesting overlaps there. thonk

[–] JohnBrownsBawdy@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

All my cases in small claims court against the tooth fairy get dismissed “with prejudice” but they pass legislation against chemtrails? Just out of touch.

[–] D61@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

I wanna see an anime of this.

This is a good start, but when are we gonna end the inhumane torture of the Kandahar giant at Guantanamo.

[–] FanofOatmeal@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago

has there ever been any kind of study whatsoever on chemtrails in the last 20+ years people have talked about it?