this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
661 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

71313 readers
3643 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

France is moving to classify X as a pornographic website, a designation that would place it under the country’s mandatory age verification and digital ID laws.

This step, if finalized, would force the company to either implement robust age-gating mechanisms or restrict access to adult content altogether to avoid being cut off from younger users.

It would also mean that users have to show ID to access the platform, introducing major implications for privacy and free speech.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Why is every country dreaming of becoming south korea?

[–] CtrlAltDefeat@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago

Kids would be better off on pornhub

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Nazi propaganda: I sleep

Porn: Real shit

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Never expected the place known for nude beaches and a president who married a pedophile to be one that implemented this kind of block.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Sad to see France is heading this direction, Canada was very close to heading this route too, thankfully it didn't end up that way.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tbh adult content is probrally the most respectable content you can find on X, especially compared to the constant Nazis and genocide apologetic liberals.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Liberals are genocide apologists?!

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 174 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The site formerly known as Twitter would be more respectable these days if it were a porn site.

[–] Emi@ani.social 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's not? Thought that's the main use.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like my porn to be less faschy and more flashy.

[–] Darkenfolk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah alright, but dem uniformed forms though..

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

The titter side was better

[–] Schwim@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Everyone in France already subbed to VPNs for the pornhub block. This won't even result in a traffic hiccup.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 105 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fucking ridiculous. Might as well do the same for sites like Tumblr, Reddit, even Youtube. "Protecting" kids comes at the expense of everyone else.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 134 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Its not about protecting kids, even if they say it is.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 54 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, of course not. Just the given excuse. Honestly, people being so obsessed with minors jacking off is creepy. Who cares? If it's a problem, then the parents can deal with it.

As a parent, I'm with you.

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Religious nut are offended because they felt funny.

[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I felt a tingle in my dingle and now I'm going to make it everyone's problem. - pretty much every religious leader

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Which is funny because it pairs so well with the agenda of the corporatists and fascists, who could give a shit about religion but would love to track you online even more.

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm certain that religion is responsible, and has been, for nearly every conflict in the last 1500 or so years. Yet, it seems to be entirely ignored by leftists (conservatives don't have a reasonable view) as the cause of problems.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I think you're confusing Liberals with Leftists.

I can't remember a single self-proclaimed "Communist" nation that wasn't anti-Religion.

Tolerance of Religion comes from the Liberal political beliefs side (which many people who are also Leftwingers have) and the modern "Liberals" in places like the US and UK (which are Rightwingers) are the ones who stretch it well beyond tolerance to the point of deeming criticism of some Religions (but not others) as a bad thing, or in other words, activelly supporting certain religions and their values (which as you pointed out, tend to be Corporatist and Fascist).

In summary, Authoritarian Leftwingers tend to be anti-Religion, Liberal Leftwingers tend to tolerate Religion and "Liberal" Rightwingers at the very least defend and sometimes even support certain specific Religions (as far as I can tell, the ones supported by their local money and power elites) but not others.

[–] altkey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

I can't remember a single self-proclaimed "Communist" nation that wasn't anti-Religion.

Besides historical trends and stuff (like how push to literacy denied religion it's power), 'communist' governments directly competed with religion on the ideological table.

Soviet people were given an afterlife-like myth of finally building the communism via socialism, for example, Lenin was a handy translation of Jesus, and so on. All pieces felt into existing sockets, that's how it worked out. It's a win for however found that conversion of ideas for the masses.

(I tolerate faith, I hate religious institutions)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Won't somebody think of the children [who should be raised by their parents, not governments]?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Leave it to the Macron government to do the right thing in the wrongest way possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkkite@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 days ago

twitter is an adult site though. i'd argue reddit is too youtube no since they do not allow explicit content

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago

Twitter is shit, but France went really nuts.

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why is anyone still on X anyway? Its AI bot trash.

[–] arararagi@ani.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Because artists are still there.

[–] JohnEdwa@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

Annoyingly many artists still use it, and for some it's their only platform they post at any regularity, except for paid posts on patreon. I haven't used Twitter as a social media site for almost a decade now, but my "twitter only" art list still has 18 people on it.

[–] Stillwater@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 days ago

This is kind of hilarious. Right wingers seek to limit privacy by forcing age verification online, and then the right wing social network gets caught in the same net. It hurt itself in it's confusion.

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 8 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Everyone should have content filtering tools. I use Adguard services for filtering my own internet (adult, Reddit, YouTube, etc.). Surely, implimenting something similar at an OS or router level would have saved us decades of pointless bickering and provided us with an actual consumer benefit?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't know if they still do it, but some mobile internet providers in the UK would filter things out unless you sent them your ID to unblock it.

Not sure it's a great solution, but better than having to provide your ID to every random website out there.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Having to provide Id to any entity to access internet pages is dystopian and fucked up, sounds just like the UK.

Not that the USA is better at all

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 17 hours ago

I think it's mostly because it's a SIM only thing and anyone can send off for one.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want it, that should be your right, but the government shouldn't be forcing it on you.

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying governments could force MS, Google, Apple to implement content filtering tools at the OS level, that give users the choice to set up filtering however they want for themselves or their kids.

This already largely works, at least on Android. I use RethinkDNS, which allows me to filter stuff already, and comes included with a host of DNS filters out of the box.

I don't need MS, Google, or Apple to do it, just make it possible to install a third-party app that does it. That way I get to decide which tool I think works best instead of whatever the OEM decides.

[–] Geist_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what does that have to do with France forcing you to show your ID to use Twitter?

[–] thisisnotmyhat@programming.dev 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Those against website age verification argue that content blocking should happen at the OS level. For example, a parent could enable the built-in "child mode" on their child's smartphone or computer. As I understand it, that would be more effective, graceful, cheaper, free speechy, and private. To a degree, tech savvy parents (and people who block ads and other content) already do similar things with third party tools - i.e. it's feasible.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sure if that was all they had in mind. This is also about collecting info and controlling what people can do, the content is just an excuse as a means of doing so.

Well, yes, there is that.

[–] shekau 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Elon probably punching air rn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago

If it's just Elon who suffers I'm fine.

load more comments
view more: next ›